Jeong-Ja Kim1. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Howon University, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine changes in the muscle tone and stiffness of the lumbar region while individuals adopted the static prone position using sling suspension. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 30 healthy women in their 20s. The muscle tone and stiffness of the upper and lower lumbar regions of the sling suspension group and a control group were measured using myotonmetory as they maintained the static prone positon. [Results] The sling suspension group showed statistically significant declines in the muscle tone and stiffness of the upper lumbar region 5-10 min after adopting the initial prone position. They also showed statistically significant declines in the muscle tone and stiffness of the lower lumbar region immediately after being suspended in the slings and a statistically significant decline in the muscle tone of the lower lumbar region 5-10 min after adopting the initial prone position during which the sling suspension was applied. In contrast, the muscle tone and stiffness of the lumbar region of the control group increased while maintaining the static prone position. [Conclusion] The static prone position performed on a treatment table using sling suspension can be an effective intervention for reducing the muscle tone and stiffness of the lumbar region.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine changes in the muscle tone and stiffness of the lumbar region while individuals adopted the static prone position using sling suspension. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 30 healthy women in their 20s. The muscle tone and stiffness of the upper and lower lumbar regions of the sling suspension group and a control group were measured using myotonmetory as they maintained the static prone positon. [Results] The sling suspension group showed statistically significant declines in the muscle tone and stiffness of the upper lumbar region 5-10 min after adopting the initial prone position. They also showed statistically significant declines in the muscle tone and stiffness of the lower lumbar region immediately after being suspended in the slings and a statistically significant decline in the muscle tone of the lower lumbar region 5-10 min after adopting the initial prone position during which the sling suspension was applied. In contrast, the muscle tone and stiffness of the lumbar region of the control group increased while maintaining the static prone position. [Conclusion] The static prone position performed on a treatment table using sling suspension can be an effective intervention for reducing the muscle tone and stiffness of the lumbar region.
Entities:
Keywords:
Muscle tone; Sling; Staitic prone position
In the presence of low back pain (LBP), the activity of paraspinal muscles can increase
following voluntary and nonvoluntary changes in motor control due to psychophysiological
responses generated by perceived stress1).
Various positions are used in physical therapy for back pain2,3,4). The prone position is frequently adopted in sling exercise and
joint mobilization interventions for musculoskeletal diseases2,3,4). During sling exercise interventions, the therapist observes the
position of the patient and changes in the muscle tone of the global muscles during
exercise2). In orthopedic manual therapy,
the muscle tone and tension are also evaluated because soft tissue palpation of the spine is
an important part of passive examinations5). Muscle tone refers to the tension exhibited during involuntary
contraction of motor units during muscle relaxation6). In evaluations of patients with LBP, it is important to
quantitatively identify muscle tone and stiffness during physical therapy evaluations, as
they provide important clinical information. The prone position is frequently used in the
treatment of patients with LBP. The aim of this study was to identify the effects of the
static prone position on a treatment table, with and without sling suspension, on the muscle
tone and stiffness of the upper and lower lumbar regions, thereby providing basic data to
help determine the appropriate treatment time for patients.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
This study involved 30 healthy community-dwelling women in their 20s. The selection
criteria were as follows: those who had not undergone surgery on the lumbar region, those
who had not experienced back pain over the previous year, and those who did not have
musculoskeletal or neurological disorders. The subjects agreed to participate in this study
after receiving an explanation of the study’s purpose and intent. Pregnant women, those who
had done muscle strengthening or aerobic exercises within the previous 5 days, or those who
had pain in body regions other than the back were excluded from the study. This study was
conducted after receiving approval from the Institutional Review Board of Howon
University.The 30 subjects were randomly divided into a sling group (mean ± SD: age, 21.8 ± 1.0 years;
height, 159.8 ± 4.5 cm; body weight, 54.6.3 ± 7.2 kg) and a control group (mean ± SD: age,
20.9 ± 0.7 years; height, 162.6 ± 5.6 cm; body weight, 57.8 ± 6.7 kg). Each group consisted
of 15 subjects. While the subjects maintained the static prone position on a treatment table
using sling suspension or on a treatment table without the aid of slings, changes in the
muscle tone and stiffness of their upper and lower lumbar regions were identified. All the
subjects participated in one session each day. For the measurements, the subjects were
instructed to wear oversized shirts and shorts to remove unnecessary pressure on the body
regions.In the sling group, the slings were attached to the head, chest, abdomen, pelvis, and both
thighs and feet while the subjects performed the prone exercise on a treatment table. The
control group did not wear slings and simply performed the prone exercise on a treatment
table. Each subject was instructed to place her neck in a neutral position relative to the
cervical spine while performing the prone exercise on the treatment table. Skin markers,
located parallel to the spinous process of L1 (upper lumbar region) and spinous process of
L4 (lower lumbar region), were then placed on the erector spinae on the dominant sides. The
erector spinae shows myofascial continuity with the calf and hamstring muscles7). While adopting the above position, a
measuring device (Myoton®PRO, MyotonAS, Estonia), which is highly reliable for
the measurement of muscle tone and stiffness8, 9), was placed perpendicularly on the point
marked earlier. The homogeneity of the subjects was then recorded by measuring the muscle
tone and stiffness of their upper and lower lumbar regions. The results revealed no
statistically significant differences between the two groups. Five minutes later, the height
of the treatment table used for the sling group was lowered, and the subjects were suspended
in the slings. The cervical and lumbar lordosis were reduced slightly to ensure the cervical
and lumbar spine were in a neutral position2). Changes in the muscle tone and stiffness of the upper and lower
lumbar regions of the subjects in the sling group were measured 5, 10, and 15 min after they
had adopted the prone position.The subjects in the control group were instructed to place their necks in a neutral
position relative to the cervical spine while adopting a relaxed static prone position on
the treatment table. Changes in the muscle tone and stiffness of the upper and lower lumbar
regions were measured 0, 5, 10, and 15 min after they had adopted the prone position. The
muscle tone and stiffness of each muscle were measured twice, and the average of the two
measured values was taken. The room temperature during the experiment was 23°.The SPSS 21.0 statistical analysis program (SPSS Inc., USA) was used for the statistical
analysis. A repeated measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) was performed to analyze changes
in the muscle tone and stiffness of each group with time, and simple and repeated contrast
tests were performed as post hoc tests. The independent t-test was performed to compare
between-group changes in muscle tone and stiffness over time. The statistical significance
level for all the statistical analyses was set at α=0.05.In the sling group, the initial measurement (0 min) was taken while the subjects were in
the prone position on the treatment table. Five minutes later, they performed the static
prone exercise using sling suspension, and changes in the muscle tone and stiffness of the
upper and lower lumbar regions were recorded 5, 10, and 15 min after adopting the prone
position under sling suspension.
RESULTS
The results of the rANOVA and repeated contrast tests revealed a statistically significant
decrease in the muscle tone and stiffness of the upper lumbar region 5–10 min after the
sling suspension was applied. The muscle tone and stiffness of the lower lumbar region
showed a statistically significant decline shortly after the subjects were suspended in the
slings (5 min), and the muscle tone of the same region statistically significantly decreased
5–10 min after the sling suspension was applied (p<0.05). In contrast, the results of the
statistical analysis of the control group showed statistically significant increases in the
muscle tone and stiffness of the upper and lower lumbar regions 5–10 min after adopting the
prone position on the treatment table (p<0.05).As shown by the results of the independent t-test, the muscle tone and stiffness of the
upper lumbar region of the sling group exhibited statistically significant larger declines
5–10 min after the sling suspension was applied, as compared to those in the control group.
In terms of the muscle tone of the lower lumbar region, the sling group showed statistically
significant larger declines than the control group at the initial measurement (0 min),
shortly after the sling suspension (5 min), and 5–10 min after the sling suspension
(p<0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Change in muscle tone, stiffness on upper and lower lumbar region
Region
Variable
Group
0 minute
5 minutes
10 minutes
15 minutes
Upper lumbar region
Muscle tone (Hz)
Sling
14.2 ± 0.2
13.8 ± 0.2
13.5 ± 0.2*
13.6 ± 0.2
Table
14.5 ± 0.2
14.7 ± 0.2
15.1 ± 0.3*
15.1 ± 0.3
Stiffness (N/m)
Sling
250.6 ± 11.4
232.3 ± 13.7
223.3 ± 10.8*
226.6 ± 10.6
Table
272.0 ± 12.4
282.8 ± 12.1
297.9 ± 14.2*
297.9 ± 14.5
Lower lumbar region
Muscle tone (Hz)
Sling
13.8 ± 0.2
12.2 ± 0.1*
12.0 ± 0.1*
12.1 ± 0.1
Table
13.8 ± 0.2
13.8 ± 0.2
14.1 ± 0.2*
14.1 ± 0.2
Stiffness (N/m)
Sling
214.5 ± 6.9
187.7 ± 9.9*
186.6 ± 11.3
180.7 ± 8.3
Table
218.1 ± 8.2
217.6 ± 8.3
227.4 ± 7.9*
224.3 ± 7.4
Values are means ± SE. p<0.05
Values are means ± SE. p<0.05
DISCUSSION
The prone position is used in a number of treatment techniques, such as mobilization of
Maitland, sling exercise, McKenzie exercise, and therapeutic massage2,3,4,5, 10,11,12). The present study showed that the muscle tone and stiffness of the
upper and lower lumbar regions of the sling group decreased with time. The treatment may
have been more effective in relieving stiffness in the sling group than in the control group
because the effects of gravity were minimized through body suspension. In contrast, the
control group showed statistically significant increases in the muscle tone and stiffness of
the upper and lower lumbar regions for the first 5 min.To achieve passive movements of lumbar segments, joint mobilization or manipulation3, 5) and
the myofascial release technique10) are
frequently performed on flat tables according to the aims of the treatments. A recent study
reported that sling exercise and core exercises were effective interventions for the control
of LBP2). Based on the results of the
present study, to reduce the muscle tone and stiffness of the lumbar region, we recommend
the maintenance of the static prone position during sling suspension for around 10 min. This
study showed declines in the muscle tone and stiffness of the lower lumbar region shortly
after the sling suspension in the static prone position. Therefore, this position can likely
be used as an effective intervention in the management of LBP.Maintaining the static prone position on a treatment table under relaxed conditions is an
effective treatment method for reducing LBP. The static prone position is applied as the
first step in McKenzie exercise11). In the
present study, the muscle tone and stiffness of the upper and lower lumbar regions showed a
statistically significantly increase 5–10 min after the subjects adopted the static prone
position on a treatment table. However, as this study consisted of healthy women in their
20s rather than patients with LBP, maintaining the prone position may have increased the
muscle tone and stiffness of the lumbar region.Based on the results of this study, when applying therapeutic massage to healthy
individuals in a prone position, the massage should be started immediately after the subject
has adopted the prone position because the muscle tone and stiffness of the lumbar region
have not yet increased.This study has some limitations. As this study involved healthy individuals, its results
cannot be generalized to patients with LBP. Furthermore, the findings cannot be used to draw
conclusions about the effectiveness of the static prone position in specific interventions.
As previous studies of muscle tone and stiffness in various treatment positions are
insufficient, there is a limitation in comparing the results of this study with those of
previous studies.This quantitative study provides important clinical information of the effects of the
static prone position performed using slings on a treatment table on the muscle tone and
stiffness of the lumbar region. Additional studies are needed to identify the muscle tone
and stiffness of individual body regions in LBP patients.