| Literature DB >> 28174452 |
Risa Otsuki1, Hiromi Matsumoto1, Masaru Ueki2, Kazutake Uehara2, Nobuko Nozawa2, Mari Osaki1, Hiroshi Hagino3.
Abstract
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of an automated stride assistance device on gait parameters and energy cost during walking performed by healthy middle-aged and young females.Entities:
Keywords: Gait exercise; Physiological cost index; Robotic device
Year: 2016 PMID: 28174452 PMCID: PMC5276761 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.3361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Fig. 1.Stride management assist device
Comparison of the characteristics of the middle-aged and young adult female groups
| Middle-aged | Young | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 55.2 ± 3.2 | 25.8 ± 2.7 * |
| Body height (cm) | 155.6 ± 6.4 | 157.9 ± 5.3 |
| Body weight (kg) | 52.6 ± 6.0 | 51.8 ± 5.3 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.8 ± 3.1 | 20.8 ± 2.2 |
| Muscle strength during knee extension (Nm/kg) | 0.61 ± 0.14 | 0.62 ± 0.15 |
| One-leg standing times (s) | 27.6 ± 7.6 | 28.5 ± 4.7 |
The data are mean ± SD. *Significant difference between middle-aged and young. BMI: body mass index
Comparison of the walking parameters with and without SMA assistance of the middle-aged and young adult female groups
| Parameter | Group | Without assistance | With assistance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Walking distance (m) | MID | 231.8 ± 23.2 | 236.7 ± 25.8 |
| YNG | 221.8 ± 24.4 | 221.6 ± 22.4 | |
| Walking speed (m/min) | MID | 77.3 ± 7.7 | 78.9 ± 8.6 |
| YNG | 73.9 ± 8.1 | 73.9 ± 7.5 | |
| Step length (m) | MID | 0.62 ± 0.05 | 0.67 ± 0.09** |
| YNG | 0.63 ± 0.06 | 0.63 ± 0.06 | |
| Cadence (steps/min) | MID | 123.7 ± 5.6* | 117.8 ± 9.6 |
| YNG | 117.0 ± 7.2 | 116.6 ± 6.6 | |
| Walk ratio (-5min/m) | MID | 505 ± 44 | 579 ± 12** |
| YNG | 543 ± 66 | 546 ± 69 |
The data are mean ± SD. *Intergroup difference between the middle-aged and young adult female groups. **Intragroup difference between without and with SMA device assistance. MID: middle-aged female; SMA: stride management assist; YNG: young healthy adult female
Changes in the PCI of young adult females without and with assistance from an SMA device
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without assistance | 0.31 ± 0.12 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | 0.32 ± 0.12 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | 0.36 ± 0.11* |
| With assistance | 0.22 ± 0.40 | 0.37 ± 0.09 | 0.35 ± 0.14 | 0.32 ± 0.17 | 0.33 ± 0.16 |
The data are mean ± SD. *Significant difference from T1, p<0.05. PCI: physiological cost index; SMA: stride management assist. T1: 1 min after start, T2: 1 min and 30 sec after start, T3: 2 min after start, T4: 2 min and 30 sec after start, T5: 3 min after start
Changes in the PCI of middle-aged females without and with assistance from an SMA device
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without assistance | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.34 ± 0.10 | 0.36 ± 0.11* | 0.36 ± 0.12 | 0.36 ± 0.13 |
| With assistance | 0.33 ± 0.08 | 0.34 ± 0.10 | 0.33 ± 0.11** | 0.33 ± 0.12 | 0.32 ± 0.13** |
The data are mean ± SD. *Significant Difference from T1, p<0.05. **Difference between the experimental conditions. PCI: physiological cost index; SMA: stride management assist. T1: 1 min after start, T2: 1 min and 30 sec after start, T3: 2 min after start, T4: 2 min and 30 sec after start, T5: 3 min after start