Yung-Tai Chen1,2, Hung-Ta Chen3,4, Chien-Yi Hsu2,5,6,7, Pei-Wen Chao7,8, Shu-Chen Kuo3, Shuo-Ming Ou9,10, Chia-Jen Shih11,12. 1. Divisions of *Nephrology and. 2. Institute of Clinical Medicine. 3. School of Medicine, and. 4. Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Heping Fuyou Branch, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Cardiovascular Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 6. Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 7. College of Medicine and. 8. Department of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 9. Institute of Clinical Medicine, drcjshih@gmail.com okokyytt@gmail.com. 10. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and. 11. School of Medicine, and drcjshih@gmail.com okokyytt@gmail.com. 12. Deran Clinic, Yilan, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the benefits and risks of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients undergoing hemodialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A nested case-control analysis of patients on hemodialysis after receipt of DES and DAPT treatment was conducted using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database for the period 2007-2011. Cases of myocardial infarction or death within 1 year after DES implantation were matched one-to-one with control patients. Odds ratios were calculated to compare DAPT continuation with discontinuation. Additionally, a propensity score-adjusted 6-month landmark cohort analysis was also conducted to evaluate the long-term benefits and risks of prolonged (>6 months) compared with ≤6 months of DAPT use. The primary outcomes were death and myocardial infarction. The secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, revascularization, and major bleeding. RESULTS: In the nested case-control analysis, patients who continued DAPT had a lower rate of death or myocardial infarction within 1 year after receipt of a DES (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.81; P=0.003), whereas this association became statistically nonsignificant when compared with patients who discontinued DAPT for the period between 6 and 12 months after receipt of a DES (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 3.04). In the propensity score-adjusted cohort analysis, >6 months of DAPT use was not associated with different primary or secondary outcomes than shorter-term use. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that the clinical effectiveness of extended DAPT in a hemodialysis population may be tempered after 6 months post-DES implantation.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the benefits and risks of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients undergoing hemodialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A nested case-control analysis of patients on hemodialysis after receipt of DES and DAPT treatment was conducted using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database for the period 2007-2011. Cases of myocardial infarction or death within 1 year after DES implantation were matched one-to-one with control patients. Odds ratios were calculated to compare DAPT continuation with discontinuation. Additionally, a propensity score-adjusted 6-month landmark cohort analysis was also conducted to evaluate the long-term benefits and risks of prolonged (>6 months) compared with ≤6 months of DAPT use. The primary outcomes were death and myocardial infarction. The secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, revascularization, and major bleeding. RESULTS: In the nested case-control analysis, patients who continued DAPT had a lower rate of death or myocardial infarction within 1 year after receipt of a DES (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.81; P=0.003), whereas this association became statistically nonsignificant when compared with patients who discontinued DAPT for the period between 6 and 12 months after receipt of a DES (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 3.04). In the propensity score-adjusted cohort analysis, >6 months of DAPT use was not associated with different primary or secondary outcomes than shorter-term use. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that the clinical effectiveness of extended DAPT in a hemodialysis population may be tempered after 6 months post-DES implantation.
Authors: Olivier Morel; Soraya El Ghannudi; Laurence Jesel; Bogdan Radulescu; Nicolas Meyer; Marie-Louise Wiesel; Sophie Caillard; Umberto Campia; Bruno Moulin; Christian Gachet; Patrick Ohlmann Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Eric L Eisenstein; Kevin J Anstrom; David F Kong; Linda K Shaw; Robert H Tuttle; Daniel B Mark; Judith M Kramer; Robert A Harrington; David B Matchar; David E Kandzari; Eric D Peterson; Kevin A Schulman; Robert M Califf Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Roxana Mehran; Stuart J Pocock; Eugenia Nikolsky; Tim Clayton; George D Dangas; Ajay J Kirtane; Helen Parise; Martin Fahy; Steven V Manoukian; Frederick Feit; Magnus E Ohman; Bernard Witzenbichler; Giulio Guagliumi; Alexandra J Lansky; Gregg W Stone Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Stefanie Schulz-Schüpke; Robert A Byrne; Jurrien M Ten Berg; Franz-Josef Neumann; Yaling Han; Tom Adriaenssens; Ralph Tölg; Melchior Seyfarth; Michael Maeng; Bernhard Zrenner; Claudius Jacobshagen; Harald Mudra; Eberhard von Hodenberg; Jochen Wöhrle; Dominick J Angiolillo; Barbara von Merzljak; Nonglag Rifatov; Sebastian Kufner; Tanja Morath; Antonia Feuchtenberger; Tareq Ibrahim; Paul W A Janssen; Christian Valina; Yi Li; Walter Desmet; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab; Klaus Tiroch; Christian Hengstenberg; Isabell Bernlochner; Marcus Fischer; Heribert Schunkert; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Albert Schömig; Julinda Mehilli; Adnan Kastrati Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Alexandru Burlacu; Simonetta Genovesi; Carlo Basile; Alberto Ortiz; Sandip Mitra; Dimitrios Kirmizis; Mehmet Kanbay; Andrew Davenport; Frank van der Sande; Adrian Covic Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Thomas A Mavrakanas; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Karim Gariani; Dean J Kereiakes; Giuseppe Gargiulo; Gérard Helft; Martine Gilard; Fausto Feres; Ricardo A Costa; Marie-Claude Morice; Jean-Louis Georges; Marco Valgimigli; Deepak L Bhatt; Laura Mauri; David M Charytan Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 8.237