| Literature DB >> 28174309 |
Xuping Xie1, Yujiao Yang1,2, Antonio E Muruato3,4, Jing Zou1, Chao Shan1, Bruno T D Nunes1,5, Daniele B A Medeiros1,5, Pedro F C Vasconcelos5, Scott C Weaver3,4,6,7,8, Shannan L Rossi3,8,9, Pei-Yong Shi10,4,11,12.
Abstract
Compared with other flaviviruses, Zika virus (ZIKV) is uniquely associated with congenital diseases in pregnant women. One recent study reported that (i) ZIKV has higher thermostability than dengue virus (DENV [a flavivirus closely related to ZIKV]), which might contribute to the disease outcome; (ii) the higher thermostability of ZIKV could arise from an extended loop structure in domain III of the viral envelope (E) protein and an extra hydrogen-bond interaction between E molecules (V. A. Kostyuchenko, E. X. Y. Lim, S. Zhang, G. Fibriansah, T.-S. Ng, J. S. G. Ooi, J. Shi, and S.-M. Lok, Nature 533:425-428, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17994). Here we report the functional analysis of the structural information in the context of complete ZIKV and DENV-2 virions. Swapping the prM-E genes between ZIKV and DENV-2 switched the thermostability of the chimeric viruses, identifying the prM-E proteins as the major determinants for virion thermostability. Shortening the extended loop of the E protein by 1 amino acid was lethal for ZIKV assembly/release. Mutations (Q350I and T351V) that abolished the extra hydrogen-bond interaction between the E proteins did not reduce ZIKV thermostability, indicating that the extra interaction does not increase the thermostability. Interestingly, mutant T351V was attenuated in A129 mice defective in type I interferon receptors, even though the virus retained the wild-type thermostability. Furthermore, we found that a chimeric ZIKV with the DENV-2 prM-E and a chimeric DENV-2 with the ZIKV prM-E were highly attenuated in A129 mice; these chimeric viruses were highly immunogenic and protective against DENV-2 and ZIKV challenge, respectively. These results indicate the potential of these chimeric viruses for vaccine development. IMPORTANCE: Analysis of a recently observed high-resolution structure of ZIKV led to a hypothesis that its unusual stability may contribute to the associated, unique disease outcomes. Here we performed a functional analysis to demonstrate that viral prM-E genes are the main determinants for the high stability of ZIKV. The extra hydrogen-bond interaction (observed in the high-resolution structure) between ZIKV E proteins did not enhance virion stability, whereas the extended loop of E protein (CD loop in domain III) was essential for ZIKV assembly. More importantly, we found that a chimeric ZIKV with DENV-2 prM-E genes and a chimeric DENV-2 with ZIKV prM-E genes were highly attenuated in A129 mice. Mice immunized with these chimeric viruses generated robust neutralizing antibody responses and were fully protected from DENV-2 and ZIKV challenge, respectively, indicating that these chimeric viruses could be further developed as vaccine candidates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28174309 PMCID: PMC5296601 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02134-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1 Generation and characterization of ZIKV and DENV-2 chimeric viruses. (A) Schematics of construction of ZIKV and DENV-2 chimeric viruses. ZV-C18, anchor C of ZIKV; DV-C14, anchor C of DENV-2. Restriction enzyme sites used for cloning are indicated. The drawing is not to scale. (B) Immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Vero cells were electroporated with equal amounts of ZIKV or CHV-1 RNAs. Mouse MAb 4G2 and goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 were used as primary and secondary antibodies. Nuclei were stained using DAPI. (C) Plaque morphologies of ZIKV and CHV-1. Plaques were developed on a Vero cell monolayer after 4.5 days of infection. (D) IFA analysis of E protein expression in BHK-21 cells transfected with DENV-2 and CHV-II RNAs. E protein was examined by IFA using 4G2 and goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with Alex Flor 568. (E) Plaque morphologies of DENV-2 and CHV-II viruses. Plaques were developed on a BHK-21 cell monolayer after 4 days of infection. (F) Virus titers and RNA copy number/PFU ratios. From 24 to 120 h p.t., supernatants were harvested at every 12 h. Levels of infectious virions (quantified in PFU per milliliter) in the culture fluids were determined by plaque assay. The copies of extracellular viral RNA at the peak titer time (RNA copies per milliliter) were quantified by qRT-PCR. (G) Virus growth kinetics. C6/36, BHK-21, Vero, and Huh7 cells were infected with ZIKV, DENV-2, CHV-I, and CHV-II at an MOI of 0.01. Extracellular infectious virions were quantified by plaque assay with a limit of detection of 10 PFU/ml. Data show mean titers from results of three independent experiments. A multiple t test was performed to analyze the statistic differences in the titers between ZIKV and CHV-I or the titers between DENV-2 and CHV-II at the indicated time points. *, P < 0.05 (significant); **, P < 0.01 (very significant); ***, P < 0.001 (extremely significant). (H) Thermostability analysis of chimeric ZIKV and DENV-2. Data indicate the means of results from three independent experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to analyze the statistical differences between each treatment group and the corresponding untreated group.
FIG 2 Characterization of ZIKV Q350I and T351V mutants. (A) Structural comparison of ZIKV (PDB identifier [ID] 5iz7) (green) and DENV-2 (PDB ID 3j27) (blue) CD loops around the 5-fold vertex of the virion. Residues Q350 and T351, creating a hydrogen-bond network, are indicated. (B) IFA. Vero cells transfected with ZIKV WT or mutant (Q350I, T351V) RNAs were examined by IFA for E protein expression. (C) Plaque morphologies. Plaques were developed on a Vero cell monolayer after 4.5 days of infection. (D) Numbers of RNA copies/PFU ratios. The RNA copies/PFU ratios calculated at 84 h p.t. are shown. (E) Comparative levels of thermostability of ZIKV Q350I and T351V mutant viruses. One-way ANOVA was performed to analyze the statistical differences between each treatment group and the corresponding untreated group.
FIG 3 Functional analysis of E protein residue A346 in ZIKV replication. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment. The sequences of the CD loop region (positions 338 to 360) in the E protein domain III were compared among two ZIKV strains (strains H/PF/2013 and FSS13025), YFV strain 17D, WNV strain NY99, JEV strain SA-14-14-2, DENV-1 strain WestPac, DENV-2 strain D2Y98P, DENV-3 strain H87, and DENV-4 strain H241. Residue A346 is highlighted in green. Identical residues are highlighted in red. (B) Location of A346 in the CD loop of ZIKV. Residue A346, which extends the CD loop toward the 5-fold vertex, is colored in purple. (C) IFA analysis of E protein expression in Vero cells transfected with WT and ΔA346 ZIKV RNAs. (D) Plaque morphologies. Plaques were developed on Vero cells after 4.5 days of infection. N.D., not detectable. (E) Effects of ΔA346 mutation on ZIKV replication. At 24 or 48 h p.t., the levels of intracellular and extracellular viral RNA were measured by quantitative RT-PCR. Results of transfection of replicon RNAs (ZIKV Rep) or an NS5 polymerase-defective genomic RNA (NS5 GDDmut) were used as controls. Relative RNA levels were calculated by normalizing the intracellular or extracellular viral RNA levels from each viral RNA-transfected cells to those of WT ZIKV full-length RNA-transfected cells. Each data point represents the mean from results of three independent experiments. At each time point, one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze the statistic differences between WT and mutant RNAs.
FIG 4 Comparison of levels of virulence of WT and mutant viruses in A129 mice. (A) Mouse viremia after infection with WT or chimeric viruses. Mice (5 mice per group) were intraperitoneally infected with 104 PFU of ZIKV, CHV-I, DENV-2, or CHV-II or were mock infected. The limit of detection (L.O.D.) for viremia was 100 PFU/ml. Each data point represents the mean level of viremia from 2 to 3 mice. At each time point, one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze the statistical significance of viremia differences between ZIKV and CHV-I/CHV-II or between DENV-2 and CHV-I/CHV-II. (B) Mock-infected or infected mice (n = 5 per group) were monitored for weight loss over the course of 9 days p.i. of WT or chimeric viruses. Two-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of weight differences among chimeric virus-infected, WT ZIKV-infected, WT DENV-2-infected, and mock-infected mice at each point. (C) Mouse viremia caused by WT ZIKV and variants (Q350I and T351V). Means and standard deviations (n = 4) are shown. (D) Mouse weight postinfection by ZIKV WT and variants (n = 8).
FIG 5 In vivo analyses of immunogenicity and protection of chimeric viruses (CHV-I and CHV-II). (A) Experimental scheme. A129 mice (4 weeks old) were infected with 1 × 104 PFU of the indicated viruses via the intraperitoneal route. On day 28 p.i., the mice were challenged with WT ZIKV (1 × 105 PFU) or DENV-2 strain D2Y98P (1 × 106 PFU) intraperitoneally. Mice were bled to monitor prechallenge neutralization titers and postchallenge viremia. (B) NT50 against ZIKV. The average of NT50 values and standard deviations of results from five mice per group are shown. One-way ANOVA was used to determine significant differences in NT50 between mock-vaccinated and ZIKV- or CHV-II-vaccinated mice. (C) Viremia after ZIKV challenge. The average viremia titers and standard deviations (on day 2 postchallenge) of results from five mice per group are shown. The limit of detection (LOD) of viremia was 100 PFU/ml. (D) NT50 against DENV-2. The averages of NT50 values and standard deviations of results from five mice per group are shown. (E) Viremia after DENV-2 challenge. The mean viremia titers and standard deviations (on day 2 postchallenge) of results from five mice per group are shown.
Sequences of PCR primers used in this study
| Primer name | Sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|
| D2-SacII-F | GCTTTG |
| D2-P1-R | TGAACATCTTGAACAGGAGACGCAGAGGCACAGATACTAG |
| D2-P1-F | GAACAGGAGACGCAGAGGCACAGATACTAGTGTCGGAATTGTTG |
| D2-P2-R | CATCTCAGCCTCCA |
| D2-P2-F | GCTG |
| D2-P3-R | CAACGCAACCACTATCAGCAGAGACGGCTGTGGATAAGAAGAT |
| D2-P3-F | CAGCCGTCTCTGCTGATAGTGGTTGCGTTGTGAGTTGGAAA |
| D2-SpeI-R | GAGACTGCA |
| ZV-NotI-F | GTCA |
| ZV-P1-R | GTGGTTAAATGGAATGCCATGGCTGTGGTCAGCAGGA |
| ZV-P1-F | GACCACAGCCATGGCATTCCATTTAACCACACGCAACGGAGAA |
| ZV-P2-R | CTTTCC |
| ZV-P2-F | CCATG |
| ZV-P3-R | GCACCCCACATCGGCCTGCACCATAACTCCCAAATACAA |
| ZV-P3-F | GAGTTATGGTGCAGGCCGATGTGGGGTGCTCGGTGGACTTCTCAAA |
| ZV-3881-R | CGA |
| ZV-NotI-1466F | TCT |
Restriction enzyme site sequences are underlined.
Sequence of RT-PCR primers and probes used in this study
| Primer name | Sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|
| ZIKV probe1 | FAM/AGCCTACCT/ZEN/TGACAAGCAATCAGACACTCAA/3IABkFQ |
| ZIKV_1193F | CCGCTGCCCAACACAAG |
| ZIKV_1269R | CCACTAACGTTCTTTTGCAGACAT |
| ZIKV probe2 | 56-FAM/TACCGCCAA/ZEN/TGAACTCGGATGGTT/3IABkFQ |
| ZIKV_6878F | CATGGTAGCAGTGGGTCTTC |
| ZIKV_6980R | CTCCTCTCTCCTTCCCATTAGA |
| DENV-2_1463F | CAGGCTATGGCACYGTCACGAT |
| DENV-2_1540R | CCATYTGCAGCARCACCATCTC |
| DENV-2 probe | FAM/CTCYCCRAG/ZEN/AACGGGMCTCGACTTCAA/3IABkFQ |
| M_GAPDH-F | AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG |
| M_GAPDH-R | TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA |
FAM, 6-carboxyfluorescein; 56-FAM, 5′ 6-carboxyfluorescein; 3IABkFQ, 3′ Iowa Black FQ quencher.