Literature DB >> 28173937

Student use and perceptions of mobile technology in clinical clerkships - Guidance for curriculum design.

Joanna K Law1, Parker A Thome2, Brenessa Lindeman3, Daren C Jackson2, Anne O Lidor4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the types of technology used by medical students in clinical clerkships, and the perception of technology implementation into the curriculum.
METHODS: An online survey about technology use was completed prior to general surgery clinical clerkship. Types of devices and frequency/comfort of use were recorded. Perceptions of the benefits and barriers to technology use in clerkship learning were elicited.
RESULTS: 125/131 (95.4%) students responded. Most students owned a smart phone (95.2%), tablet (52.8%), or both (50%); 61.6% spent > 11 h/week learning on a device at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine for educational purposes. Technology use was seen as beneficial by 97.6% of students. Classes that used technology extensively were preferred by 54% of students, although 47.2% perceived decreased faculty/classmate interaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Students use mobile technology to improve how they learn new material, and prefer taking classes that incorporate information technology. However, in-person/blended curricula are preferable to completely online courses.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clerkship; Curriculum; Medical student; Mobile technology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28173937     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Technology readiness of medical students and the association of technology readiness with specialty interest.

Authors:  Wyatt MacNevin; Eric Poon; Thomas A Skinner
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-04-30

2.  Bridging the gap between informatics and medicine upon medical school entry: Implementing a course on the Applicative Use of ICT.

Authors:  Natasa M Milic; Nikola Ilic; Dejana M Stanisavljevic; Andja M Cirkovic; Jelena S Milin; Zoran M Bukumiric; Nikola V Milic; Marko D Savic; Sara M Ristic; Goran Z Trajkovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mobile learning in medicine: an evaluation of attitudes and behaviours of medical students.

Authors:  Thomas J G Chase; Adam Julius; Joht Singh Chandan; Emily Powell; Charles S Hall; Benedict Lyle Phillips; Ryan Burnett; Deborah Gill; Bimbi Fernando
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Urology at your fingertips: the development of a urology m-learning app for medical students.

Authors:  Kevin Gerard Keane; Nikita Rajiv Bhatt; Patrick Michael Collins; Robert Joseph Flynn; Rustom Pervez Manecksha
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-03

5.  Hurdles for adopting mobile learning devices at the outset of clinical courses.

Authors:  Daniel Folger; Jussi Merenmies; Lena Sjöberg; Eeva Pyörälä
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.