| Literature DB >> 28173805 |
Chiara Locatelli1, Cristian Piras1, Giulia Riscazzi1, Isabella Alloggio1, Ilaria Spalla1, Alessio Soggiu1, Viviana Greco2, Luigi Bonizzi1, Paola Roncada1,3, Paola G Brambilla4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myxomatous mitral valve disease (MVD) is the most common acquired heart disease in dogs, and the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel (CKCS) is the most studied breed because of the high prevalence, early onset and hereditary component evidenced in the breed. MVD has different severity levels, and there are many practical limitations in identifying its asymptomatic stages. Proteomic techniques are valuable for studying the proteins and peptides involved in cardiovascular diseases, including the period prior to the clinical onset of the disease. The aim of this study was to identify the serum proteins that were differentially expressed in healthy CKCS and those affected by MVD in mild to severe stages. Proteomics analysis was performed using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis separation and a bioinformatics analysis for the detection of differentially expressed spots. In a comparative analysis, protein spots with a p < 0.05 (ANOVA) were considered statistically significant and were excised from the gels for analysis by MALDI-TOF-MS for protein identification.Entities:
Keywords: Cavalier King Charles Spaniel; Dog; Mitral valve disease; Proteomic analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28173805 PMCID: PMC5297119 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-0951-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Population characteristics
| ID | Age (years) | Sex | Weight (kg) | MVD severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | F | 11,5 | H |
| 2 | 2 | F | 6,8 | H |
| 3 | 1,5 | F | 9 | H |
| 4 | 3 | F | 7 | H |
| 5 | 2 | M | 7,5 | M |
| 6 | 5,5 | F | 5 | M |
| 7 | 10 | FS | 9 | M |
| 8 | 7 | F | 9 | M |
| 9 | 9 | M | 8 | S |
| 10 | 7 | M | 12 | S |
| 11 | 11 | FS | 9,5 | S |
| 12 | 9 | M | 8 | S |
MVD mitral valve disease, F female, M male, FS neutered female, H healthy dogs, M mild affected, S severe affected
Echocardiographic variables in all dogs and in each groups of severity
| Variables M mode | Normal value | Over all population (12 dogs) | Group H (4 dogs) | Group M (4 dogs) | Group S (4 dogs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVIDs (mm) | * 15.2 ± 4.8 | 19.8 (15.9-31.4) | 19.1 (16.2-20.7) | 19.2 (17.7-22.6) | 19.45 (15.9-31.4) |
| LVIDd (mm) | * 26 ± 4.7 | 30.95 (25.1-49.8) | 29.75 (25.1-31.1) | 30.1 (25.3-33.9) | 39.65 (34.6-49.8) |
| LVIDas | 0.71-1.26 | 0.94 (0.82-1.63) | 0.92 (0.87-1.12) | 1.11 (0.93-1.15) | 0.92 (0.82-1.63) |
| LVIDasd | 1.27-1.85 | 1.77 (1.22-2.7) | 1.61 (1.22-1.77) | 1.65 (1.30-1.91) | 1.97 (1.86-2.7) |
| ESVI (ml/m2) | <30 | 31.9 (17-96) | 23.9 (19.9-37.1) | 37.9 (39.3-23.8) | 36.5 (17.4-96.1) |
| EDVI (ml/m2) | <100 | 105.8 (43-287) | 84.9 (43.4-104.7) | 91.3 (59-125.7) | 157.5 (120-287.9) |
| EF% | * 70 ± 9.20 | 67.5 (38-86) | 69 (38-78) | 61.5 (51-69) | 83 (66-86) |
| Variables 2D | |||||
| LA/Ao | * 1.22 ± 0.31 | 1.3 (0.9-3.1) | 1.2 (0.9-1.3) | 1.2 (0.9-1.6) | 2.14 (1.6-3.1) |
| ESVI (ml/m2) | <30 | 24 (18-42) | 24.5 (18-30) | 20 (17-26) | 41 (40-42) |
| EDVI (ml/m2) | <70 | 53.5 (31-167) | 45 (37-54) | 54.5 (31-68) | 123.5 (80-167) |
LVIDd was significantly increased in dogs in group S compared with dogs in group H (p = 0.0304) and with dogs in group M (p = 0.0304). LVIDad was increased in group S compared with group H (p = 0.0304). M-mode-derived EDVI was significantly increased in dogs in group S compared with dogs in group H (p = 0.0304). The ratio of left atrial to aorta root was significantly increased in dogs in group S than in group M (p = 0.0304) and group H (p = 0.0304). No statistically significant difference was found in the LVIDs, LVIDas, ESVI (M-mode), ESVI and EDVI (2-D) FS% and EF% (M-mode and 2-D) among the groups
Data are reported as median and ranges (minimum-maximum). *Data are expressed as means values ± standard deviation
Electrolytes levels, red blood cells count (RBCC) and hematocrit reported as median and ranges (minimum–maximum) in all dogs and in each groups of severity
| Normal Value | Over all population | Group H (4 dogs) | Group M (4 dogs) | Group S (4 dogs) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum Calcium (mg/dl) | 8.98-11.82 | 10.6 (9-12.2) | 11.65 (11.3-11.9) | 10.6 (9.3-12.2) | 9.75 (9-10.1) |
| Serum Potassium (mmol/l) | 3.7 – 5.8 | 4.6 (4.3-5.2) | 4.75 (4.5-4.9) | 4.65 (4.3-5.2) | 4.45 (4.3-4.6) |
| RBCC (x106/ μl) | 5.5-8.5 | 6.23 (5.64-7.08) | 6.45 (6.16-6.87) | 6.1 (5.64-7.08) | 6 (5.45-6.28) |
| Hematocrit (%) | 35 - 55 | 37.4 (32.2-40.1) | 36.55 (33.8-40.1) | 37.6 (37.4-38.4) | 35.9 (32.2-40.1) |
Protein identification by MALDI-TOF-TOF analysis
H healthy, M medium, S severe, CV variation coefficient, Mr relative Mass, pI isolectric point, aName of identified proteins; bAccession No. according to database cPeptide Mass Fingerprinting score calculated by MASCOT 2.4.1 algorithm (http://www.matrixscience.com) after database search; d sequence coverage; Number of experimental peptides matched versus searched peptides; fAminoacidic sequence of the peptides identified by MS/MS analysis; gMonoisotopic masses of the parent iones used for MS/MS analysis
Fig. 12D map showing the position of the protein spots analyzed by MALDI TOF MS. The red arrows and the numbers indicated correspond to the dataset showed in Table 3 indicating the differential expression pattern among experimental groups