Literature DB >> 28173628

Designing ecological climate change impact assessments to reflect key climatic drivers.

Helen R Sofaer1, Joseph J Barsugli2, Catherine S Jarnevich1, John T Abatzoglou3, Marian K Talbert4, Brian W Miller4, Jeffrey T Morisette4.   

Abstract

Identifying the climatic drivers of an ecological system is a key step in assessing its vulnerability to climate change. The climatic dimensions to which a species or system is most sensitive - such as means or extremes - can guide methodological decisions for projections of ecological impacts and vulnerabilities. However, scientific workflows for combining climate projections with ecological models have received little explicit attention. We review Global Climate Model (GCM) performance along different dimensions of change and compare frameworks for integrating GCM output into ecological models. In systems sensitive to climatological means, it is straightforward to base ecological impact assessments on mean projected changes from several GCMs. Ecological systems sensitive to climatic extremes may benefit from what we term the 'model space' approach: a comparison of ecological projections based on simulated climate from historical and future time periods. This approach leverages the experimental framework used in climate modeling, in which historical climate simulations serve as controls for future projections. Moreover, it can capture projected changes in the intensity and frequency of climatic extremes, rather than assuming that future means will determine future extremes. Given the recent emphasis on the ecological impacts of climatic extremes, the strategies we describe will be applicable across species and systems. We also highlight practical considerations for the selection of climate models and data products, emphasizing that the spatial resolution of the climate change signal is generally coarser than the grid cell size of downscaled climate model output. Our review illustrates how an understanding of how climate model outputs are derived and downscaled can improve the selection and application of climatic data used in ecological modeling.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  climate bias-correction; climate change impacts; climate extremes; climate variability; delta method; ecological projections

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28173628     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  4 in total

Review 1.  Impact of past and on-going changes on climate and weather on vector-borne diseases transmission: a look at the evidence.

Authors:  Florence Fouque; John C Reeder
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.520

2.  Projecting species' vulnerability to climate change: Which uncertainty sources matter most and extrapolate best?

Authors:  Valerie Steen; Helen R Sofaer; Susan K Skagen; Andrea J Ray; Barry R Noon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Evaluating multiple historical climate products in ecological models under current and projected temperatures.

Authors:  Giancarlo Sadoti; Stephanie A McAfee; E Fleur Nicklen; Pamela J Sousanes; Carl A Roland
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Limited shifts in the distribution of migratory bird breeding habitat density in response to future changes in climate.

Authors:  Owen P McKenna; David M Mushet; Samuel R Kucia; Elyssa C McCulloch-Huseby
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 6.105

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.