Literature DB >> 2817161

Nulliparity, decade of first birth, and breast cancer in Connecticut cohorts, 1855 to 1945: an ecological study.

R A Hahn1, S H Moolgavkar.   

Abstract

Risk of breast cancer increases with age at first birth, and is lower in women who bear their first children while young than in nulliparous women. While previous studies have investigated risk of breast cancer in birth cohorts by examining partial aspects of cohort childbearing, the present ecological study assesses total cohort childbearing risk in Connecticut women born between 1855 and 1945. In each cohort, the proportion of women nulliparous and first bearing children in their twenties, thirties, and forties are weighted by relative risks associated with these events as ascertained in previous studies. Summed cohort childbearing risks are compared to the incidence of breast cancer in women 40 years of age and older in the same cohorts. Changes in decade of first birth and nulliparity do not explain the changes in breast cancer incidence observed: while cohort childbearing risk has declined over the period examined, breast cancer incidence has increased in the same cohorts. Alternative explanations for cohort increases in breast cancer incidence are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2817161      PMCID: PMC1349802          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  35 in total

1.  Breast cancer in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K Stavraky; S Emmons
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Projected changes in breast cancer incidence due to the trend toward delayed childbearing.

Authors:  E White
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Evidence for a secular trend in age of menarche.

Authors:  G Wyshak; R E Frisch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Two-stage model for carcinogenesis: Epidemiology of breast cancer in females.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar; N E Day; R G Stevens
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Lactation and breast cancer. Evidence for a negative association in premenopausal women.

Authors:  T Byers; S Graham; T Rzepka; J Marshall
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Lactation and cancer of the breast. A summary of an international study.

Authors:  B MacMahon; T M Lin; C R Lowe; A P Mirra; B Ravnihar; E J Salber; D Trichopoulos; V G Valaoras; S Yuasa
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Early age at first birth and decreased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  C Bain; W Willett; B Rosner; F E Speizer; C Belanger; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Reproductive factors in the aetiology of breast cancer.

Authors:  L A Brinton; R Hoover; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Breast cancer rates in populations of single women.

Authors:  G Hems; A Stuart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Associations between breast-cancer mortality rates, child-bearing and diet in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  G Hems
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  On ecological studies: a short communication.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Circadian and melatonin disruption by exposure to light at night drives intrinsic resistance to tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert T Dauchy; Shulin Xiang; Lulu Mao; Samantha Brimer; Melissa A Wren; Lin Yuan; Muralidharan Anbalagan; Adam Hauch; Tripp Frasch; Brian G Rowan; David E Blask; Steven M Hill
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Breast cancer and circadian disruption from electric lighting in the modern world.

Authors:  Richard G Stevens; George C Brainard; David E Blask; Steven W Lockley; Mario E Motta
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Recent trends in breast cancer incidence, mortality, and mammography.

Authors:  P A Newcomb; P M Lantz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Pregnancy-induced changes in breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Irma H Russo; Jose Russo
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.673

6.  Late age at first full term birth is strongly associated with lobular breast cancer.

Authors:  Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Kathleen M Egan; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Shaneda Warren Andersen; E Robert Greenberg; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Light-at-night, circadian disruption and breast cancer: assessment of existing evidence.

Authors:  Richard G Stevens
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  The increasing incidence of breast cancer since 1982: relevance of early detection.

Authors:  B A Miller; E J Feuer; B F Hankey
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Are increases in mammographic screening still a valid explanation for trends in breast cancer incidence in the United States?

Authors:  L M Wun; E J Feuer; B A Miller
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 10.  Medical hypothesis: xenoestrogens as preventable causes of breast cancer.

Authors:  D L Davis; H L Bradlow; M Wolff; T Woodruff; D G Hoel; H Anton-Culver
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.