Literature DB >> 28169502

Physiological adaptation of maternal plasma volume during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

S de Haas1, C Ghossein-Doha1, S M J van Kuijk2, J van Drongelen3, M E A Spaanderman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the physiological pattern of gestational plasma volume adjustments in normal singleton pregnancy and compare this with the pattern in pregnancies complicated by pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia or fetal growth restriction.
METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of the current literature on plasma volume adjustments during physiological and complicated pregnancies. Literature was retrieved from PubMed (NCBI) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases. Included studies reported both reference plasma volume measurements (non-pregnant, prepregnancy or postpartum) and measurements obtained during predetermined gestational ages. Mean differences bet ween the reference and pregnancy plasma volume measurements were calculated for predefined intervals of gestational age using a random-effects model described by DerSimonian and Laird.
RESULTS: Thirty studies were included in the meta-analysis with publication dates ranging from 1934 to 2007. Plasma volume increased in the first weeks of pregnancy, with the steepest increase occurring during the second trimester. Plasma volume continued to increase in the third trimester with a pooled maximum increase of 1.13 L (95% CI, 1.07-1.19 L), an increase of 45.6% (95% CI, 43.0-48.1%) in physiological pregnancies compared with the reference value. The plasma volume expansion in gestational hypertensive and growth-restricted pregnancies was 0.80 L (95% CI, 0.59-1.02 L), an increase of 32.3% (95% CI, 23.6-41.1%) in the third trimester, a smaller increase than in physiological pregnancies (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: During physiological pregnancy, plasma volume increases by, on average, more than 1 L as compared with non-pregnant conditions. In pregnancies complicated by pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia or fetal growth restriction, plasma volume increase in the third trimester is 13.3% lower than in normal pregnancy.
Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Adaptación fisiológica del volumen del plasma materno durante el embarazo: una revisi\xF3n sistemática y metaanálisis RESUMEN OBJETIVO: Describir el patrón fisiológico de los cambios en el volumen del plasma gestacional en embarazos normales con feto único y compararlo con el patrón en los embarazos complicados por hipertensión gestacional, preeclampsia o restricción del crecimiento fetal. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un metaanálisis de la literatura actual sobre los cambios en el volumen de plasma durante embarazos complicados y fisiológicos. La literatura se obtuvo de las bases de datos PubMed (NCBI) y EMBASE (Ovid). Los estudios incluidos mencionaban tanto mediciones de referencia del volumen plasmático (no embarazada, antes del embarazo o después del parto) como mediciones tomadas a edades gestacionales predeterminadas. Se calcularon las medias de las diferencias entre las mediciones de referencia y las del embarazo para el volumen plasmático a intervalos predefinidos de la edad gestacional, utilizando un modelo de efectos aleatorios descrito por DerSimonian y Laird. RESULTADOS: En el metaanálisis se incluyeron treinta estudios con fechas de publicación entre 1934 y 2007. El volumen plasmático aumentó en las primeras semanas de embarazo y el mayor incremento se produjo durante el segundo trimestre. El volumen de plasma continuó aumentando en el tercer trimestre con un aumento combinado máximo de 1,13L (IC 95%, 1,7-1,19 L), lo que supone un aumento del 45,6% (IC 95%, 43,0-48,1%) en embarazos fisiológicas en comparación con el valor de referencia. El aumento del volumen plasmático en los embarazos con hipertensión y con crecimiento intrauterino restringido fue de 0,80L (IC 95%, 0,59-1,02 L), lo que supone un aumento del 32,3% (IC 95%, 23,6-41,1%) en el tercer trimestre, y un incremento menor que en los embarazos fisiológicos (P <0,0001). CONCLUSIONES: Durante el embarazo fisiológico el volumen de plasma aumenta, en promedio, más de 1L, en comparación con el de las no embarazadas. En los embarazos complicados por hipertensión gestacional, preeclampsia o restricción del crecimiento fetal, el aumento del volumen plasmático en el tercer trimestre es un 13,3% menor que en el embarazo normal. :meta : ,、。 : meta。PubMed(NCBI)EMBASE(Ovid)。(、)。DerSimonianLaird,。 : Meta30,19342007。,。,1.13 L(95% CI,1.07~1.19 L),,45.6%(95% CI,43.0%~48.1%)。0.80 L(95%CI,0.59~1.02 L),32.3%(95% CI,23.6%~41.1%),(P<0.0001)。 : ,,1 L。、,13.3%。. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood volume; complicated pregnancy; physiology; plasma volume; pre-eclampsia; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28169502     DOI: 10.1002/uog.17360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  43 in total

1.  Blood Support for Fertility, Pregnancy, and Postpartum Using Acupuncture from Ancient Medical Texts' Theory.

Authors:  Susie Hayes
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2019-12-13

2.  Muscle sympathetic nerve activity and volume-regulating factors in healthy pregnant and nonpregnant women.

Authors:  Nisha Charkoudian; Charlotte W Usselman; Rachel J Skow; Jeffery S Staab; Colleen G Julian; Michael K Stickland; Radha S Chari; Rshmi Khurana; Sandra T Davidge; Margie H Davenport; Craig D Steinback
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Long-term presence of angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibody reduces aldosterone production by triggering Ca2+ overload in H295R cells.

Authors:  Jinghui Lei; Suli Zhang; Pengli Wang; Yang Liao; Jingwei Bian; Xiaochen Yin; Ye Wu; Lina Bai; Feng Wang; Xiaoli Yang; Huirong Liu
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 4.  Anatomical and physiological alterations of pregnancy.

Authors:  Jamil M Kazma; John van den Anker; Karel Allegaert; André Dallmann; Homa K Ahmadzia
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Longitudinal study of cerebral blood flow regulation during exercise in pregnancy.

Authors:  Brittany A Matenchuk; Marina James; Rachel J Skow; Paige Wakefield; Christina MacKay; Craig D Steinback; Margie H Davenport
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Maternal cardiac messenger RNA expression of extracellular matrix proteins in mice during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Authors:  Megan E Parrott; Esam Aljrbi; Diane L Biederman; Ryan N Montalvo; Jeremy L Barth; Holly A LaVoie
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2018-12-12

Review 7.  Research Recommendations From the National Institutes of Health Workshop on Predicting, Preventing, and Treating Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Christine Maric-Bilkan; Vikki M Abrahams; S Sonia Arteaga; Ghada Bourjeily; Kirk P Conrad; Janet M Catov; Maged M Costantine; Brian Cox; Vesna Garovic; Eric M George; Alison D Gernand; Arun Jeyabalan; S Ananth Karumanchi; Aaron D Laposky; Menachem Miodovnik; Megan Mitchell; Victoria L Pemberton; Uma M Reddy; Mark K Santillan; Eleni Tsigas; Kent L R Thornburg; Kenneth Ward; Leslie Myatt; James M Roberts
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 8.  Pregnancy and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Karishma P Ramlakhan; Mark R Johnson; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Pregnancy in a woman with a Fontan circulation: A review.

Authors:  Emily Moroney; Elske Posma; Alicia Dennis; Yves d'Udekem; Rachael Cordina; Dominica Zentner
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2017-11-22

10.  Plasma concentration of trimethylamine-N-oxide and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Peiyun Li; Chunrong Zhong; Shuzhen Li; Taoping Sun; Hao Huang; Xi Chen; Yalun Zhu; Xiaoli Hu; Xiaobo Peng; Xu Zhang; Wei Bao; Zhilei Shan; Jinquan Cheng; Frank B Hu; Nianhong Yang; Liegang Liu
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.