Literature DB >> 28169019

Correlates of Patient Intent and Preference on Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Masahito Jimbo1, Ananda Sen2, Melissa A Plegue1, Sarah T Hawley3, Karen Kelly-Blake4, Mary Rapai1, Minling Zhang1, Yuhong Zhang1, Mack T Ruffin5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Information is limited on patient characteristics that influence their preference among screening options and intent to be screened for colorectal cancer (CRC). A mechanistic pathway to intent and preference was examined through a formal mediation analysis.
METHODS: From 2012 to 2014, a total of 570 adults aged 50-75 years were recruited from 15 primary care practices in Metro Detroit for a trial on decision aids for CRC screening. Confirmatory factor, regression, and mediation analyses were performed in 2015-2016 on baseline cross-sectional data. Main outcomes were patient intent and preference. Perceived risk and self-efficacy were secondary outcomes. Covariates included demographic information, health status, previous CRC screening experience, patient attitudes, and knowledge.
RESULTS: Mean age was 57.7 years, 56.1% were women, and 55.1% white and 36.6% black. Women had 32% and 41% lower odds than men of perceiving CRC to be high/moderate risk (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.47, 0.97, p=0.03) and having high self-efficacy (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.42, 0.85, p=0.006), respectively. Whites had 63% and 47% lower odds than blacks of having high self-efficacy (OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.25, 0.57, p<0.001) and intent to undergo CRC screening (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.34, 0.84, p=0.007), respectively. Younger age, higher knowledge, lower level of test worries, and medium/high versus low self-efficacy increased the odds of intent of being screened. Self-efficacy, but not perceived risk, significantly mediated the association between race, attitude, and test worries and patient screening intent.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-efficacy mediated the association between race, attitude, and test worries and patient intent.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28169019     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  4 in total

1.  Screening initiation with FIT or colonoscopy: Post-hoc analysis of a pragmatic, randomized trial.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Chul Ahn; Sandi L Pruitt; Amy E Hughes; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta; Noel O Santini; Katharine McCallister; Joanne M Sanders; Amit G Singal; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Predicting adoption of colorectal cancer screening among Korean Americans using a decision tree model.

Authors:  Seok Won Jin; Christina Soyoung Song
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.732

3.  Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among African American Men Living with HIV.

Authors:  Terri-Ann Kelly; Soojong Kim; Loretta S Jemmott; John B Jemmott
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2021-05-08

4.  Knowledge, attitudes, and worries among different health literacy groups before receiving first invitation to colorectal cancer screening: Cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Pernille Gabel; Mette Bach Larsen; Adrian Edwards; Pia Kirkegaard; Berit Andersen
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-04-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.