Rahul Bhattacharyya1, Prem Ruben Jayaram2, Robin Holliday3, Paul Jenkins4, Iain Anthony5, Lech Rymaszewski6. 1. West of Scotland Deanery, UK. Electronic address: rahulbhattacharyya09@gmail.com. 2. East of England Deanery, UK. Electronic address: premruben@yahoo.com. 3. Glasgow Medical School, UK. Electronic address: 1106516H@student.gla.ac.uk. 4. Glasgow Royal Infirmiry, UK. Electronic address: paul@jenkinsnet.org.uk. 5. Glasgow Royal Infirmiry, UK. Electronic address: iain.anthony@ggc.scot.nhs.uk. 6. Glasgow Royal Infirmiry, UK. Electronic address: lech.rymaszewski@ggc.scot.nhs.uk.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We re-designed the outpatient management of trauma at our institution to eliminate appointments if there would be no change in management or information provision. All cases referred by the Emergency Department (ED) were reviewed at a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) by an orthopaedic consultant and telephoned afterwards by a senior nurse. If face-to-face review was required, it was arranged at a specialist shoulder clinic. AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion of clavicle fractures that could be discharged without physical review. The secondary aim was to assess the patient reported functional outcome and satisfaction among patients who were discharged without further review. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients who attended the ED with a clavicle fracture between October 2011 and September 2012. 138 patients were included. The number of patients who were discharged without a physical review was analysed. All radiographs were classified according to the Robinson classification. We recorded the number of undisplaced/minimally-displaced fractures that were discharged virtually. The number of patients with a displaced midshaft fracture who were seen at a specialist clinic was also recorded. A questionnaire was sent to all patients at one year post-injury to evaluate their outcome (QuickDASH and EQ-5D) and satisfaction with the new service. RESULTS: 62/138 (45%) were directly discharged from the VFC. The majority of virtual discharges occurred in the undisplaced fracture types (84% versus 13%, RR 6.4, 95% CI 3.5-11.5). 78% patients responded to the questionnaires. 91% of patients were satisfied with their recovery from the injury. 86.4% patients were satisfied with the information provided regarding their treatment. In the virtually discharged group the mean EQ-5D VAS was 78.1 (EQ5D range 0.06-1, SD 0.248). The mean Quick DASH score was 16.1(SD 25.2). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual discharge of undisplaced clavicle fractures is appropriate and results in acceptable clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. This redesigned process has significant benefits for patients as there were far fewer hospital visits by avoiding unnecessary appointments. The orthopaedic service also benefited by having more time available for the management of complex cases. Crown
INTRODUCTION: We re-designed the outpatient management of trauma at our institution to eliminate appointments if there would be no change in management or information provision. All cases referred by the Emergency Department (ED) were reviewed at a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) by an orthopaedic consultant and telephoned afterwards by a senior nurse. If face-to-face review was required, it was arranged at a specialist shoulder clinic. AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion of clavicle fractures that could be discharged without physical review. The secondary aim was to assess the patient reported functional outcome and satisfaction among patients who were discharged without further review. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients who attended the ED with a clavicle fracture between October 2011 and September 2012. 138 patients were included. The number of patients who were discharged without a physical review was analysed. All radiographs were classified according to the Robinson classification. We recorded the number of undisplaced/minimally-displaced fractures that were discharged virtually. The number of patients with a displaced midshaft fracture who were seen at a specialist clinic was also recorded. A questionnaire was sent to all patients at one year post-injury to evaluate their outcome (QuickDASH and EQ-5D) and satisfaction with the new service. RESULTS: 62/138 (45%) were directly discharged from the VFC. The majority of virtual discharges occurred in the undisplaced fracture types (84% versus 13%, RR 6.4, 95% CI 3.5-11.5). 78% patients responded to the questionnaires. 91% of patients were satisfied with their recovery from the injury. 86.4% patients were satisfied with the information provided regarding their treatment. In the virtually discharged group the mean EQ-5D VAS was 78.1 (EQ5D range 0.06-1, SD 0.248). The mean Quick DASH score was 16.1(SD 25.2). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual discharge of undisplaced clavicle fractures is appropriate and results in acceptable clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. This redesigned process has significant benefits for patients as there were far fewer hospital visits by avoiding unnecessary appointments. The orthopaedic service also benefited by having more time available for the management of complex cases. Crown
Authors: Gerard A Sheridan; Matthew Nagle; Catherine Howells; Olga Gallagher; Patrick J Kiely; Patrick O'Toole; Paula M Kelly; David P Moore Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2019-05-25 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Evelyn P Murphy; Christopher Fenelon; Robert P Murphy; Michael D O'Sullivan; Eoghan Pomeroy; Eoin Sheehan; David P Moore Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Georgina Jones; Victoria Brennan; Richard Jacques; Hilary Wood; Simon Dixon; Stephen Radley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240