Literature DB >> 28168887

Cervical and Ocular VEMP Testing in Diagnosing Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

Jacob B Hunter1, Neil S Patel2, Brendan P O'Connell1, Matthew L Carlson2, Neil T Shepard2, Devin L McCaslin1, George B Wanna1.   

Abstract

Objective To determine the sensitivity and specificity of ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) and to describe the VEMP response characteristics that are most sensitive to SCD and compare the findings to previous reports. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Two tertiary neurotologic referral centers. Subjects and Methods Cervical and ocular VEMP peak-to-peak amplitudes and thresholds from 39 adult patients older than 18 years with surgically confirmed SCD were compared with 84 age-matched controls. Results Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, cervical VEMP (cVEMP) amplitudes, cVEMP thresholds, and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) amplitudes had areas under the curve of 0.731, 0.912, and 0.856, respectively, all of which were statistically significant ( P < .0001). For cVEMP thresholds, at the clinical equivalent ≤85-dB normalized hearing level (nHL) threshold, the sensitivity and specificity were 97.3% and 31.3%, respectively. At the ≤70-dB nHL threshold, the sensitivity and specificity were 73.0% and 94.0%, respectively. For oVEMP amplitudes >12.0 µV, the sensitivity and specificity were 78.6% and 81.7%, respectively. Conclusion Data from this multicenter study suggest that both cVEMP thresholds and oVEMP amplitudes remain good diagnostic tests for identifying SCD, with each test dependent on a number of factors. The sensitivity and specificity of these individual tests may vary slightly between centers depending on testing parameters used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VEMP; cranial base; neurotology; skull base; superior semicircular canal dehiscence; vestibular

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28168887     DOI: 10.1177/0194599817690720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  6 in total

1.  Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Menière's Disease: A Comparison of Response Metrics.

Authors:  Kimberley S Noij; Barbara S Herrmann; John J Guinan; Steven D Rauch
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Toward Optimizing cVEMP: 2,000-Hz Tone Bursts Improve the Detection of Superior Canal Dehiscence.

Authors:  Kimberley S Noij; Barbara S Herrmann; John J Guinan; Steven D Rauch
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 3.  Animal Models of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: The Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Brian D Corneil; Aaron J Camp
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 4.  Measuring Vestibular Contributions to Age-Related Balance Impairment: A Review.

Authors:  Andrew R Wagner; Olaoluwa Akinsola; Ajit M W Chaudhari; Kimberly E Bigelow; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Bone-Conducted oVEMP Latency Delays Assist in the Differential Diagnosis of Large Air-Conducted oVEMP Amplitudes.

Authors:  Rachael L Taylor; John S Magnussen; Belinda Kwok; Allison S Young; Berina Ihtijarevic; Emma C Argaet; Nicole Reid; Cheryl Rivas; Jacob M Pogson; Sally M Rosengren; G Michael Halmagyi; Miriam S Welgampola
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: Diagnostic criteria consensus document of the committee for the classification of vestibular disorders of the Bárány Society.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Raymond van de Berg; Vincent van Rompaey; Alexandre Bisdorff; Timothy E Hullar; Miriam S Welgampola; John P Carey
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.