Literature DB >> 28168852

Hemoglobin screening in blood donors: a prospective study assessing the value of an invasive and a noninvasive point-of-care device for donor safety.

Dorien De Clippel1, Leen Van Heddegem1, Giovani Vandewalle1, Philippe Vandekerckhove1,2,3, Veerle Compernolle1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low hemoglobin (Hb) levels are a common reason for whole blood donor deferral. As some of the deferred donors do not return to donate blood later, the development of accurate tools to reliably detect low Hb levels is therefore important for donor safety and retention. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 1483 whole blood donors were enrolled in three study arms. In each study arm the Hb results measured with a point-of-care testing device were compared with the venous Hb results obtained in our central laboratory. Both an invasive capillary Hb (Compolab) and a noninvasive spectroscopy Hb (Haemospect) were tested. For the latter, two different application methods for the positioning of the Digiclip were assessed. In a second phase the Compolab was tested in routine conditions.
RESULTS: The Haemospect device failed to reliably identify donors with Hb levels below the European cutoffs (125 g/L for females and 135 g/L for males). In contrast, the Compolab identified 72.4% of first-time donors and 78.9% of regular donors with Hb levels below these cutoffs. In routine conditions, the Compolab identified the majority of donors with low Hb levels.
CONCLUSION: Differences between Hb levels measured with invasive and noninvasive point-of-care devices and measured on venous samples exist. Implementing the Compolab at collection sites provides a high level of safety toward first-time donors.
© 2017 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28168852     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the usefulness of non-invasive serum haemoglobin measurement in a perioperative setting in a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Gabriel Honnef; Daniel Auinger; Michael Eichinger; Michael Eichlseder; Philipp G H Metnitz; Martin Rief; Paul Zajic; Philipp Zoidl; Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  Emerging point-of-care technologies for anemia detection.

Authors:  Ran An; Yuning Huang; Yuncheng Man; Russell W Valentine; Erdem Kucukal; Utku Goreke; Zoe Sekyonda; Connie Piccone; Amma Owusu-Ansah; Sanjay Ahuja; Jane A Little; Umut A Gurkan
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Comparison of four methods to measure haemoglobin concentrations in whole blood donors (COMPARE): A diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Steven Bell; Michael Sweeting; Anna Ramond; Ryan Chung; Stephen Kaptoge; Matthew Walker; Thomas Bolton; Jennifer Sambrook; Carmel Moore; Amy McMahon; Sarah Fahle; Donna Cullen; Susan Mehenny; Angela M Wood; Jane Armitage; Willem H Ouwehand; Gail Miflin; David J Roberts; John Danesh; Emanuele Di Angelantonio
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 2.019

4.  Metabolism-Driven High-Throughput Cancer Identification with GLUT5-Specific Molecular Probes.

Authors:  Srinivas Kannan; Vagarshak V Begoyan; Joseph R Fedie; Shuai Xia; Łukasz J Weseliński; Marina Tanasova; Smitha Rao
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.