Literature DB >> 28168699

The role of sexual and natural selection in shaping patterns of sexual dichromatism in the largest family of songbirds (Aves: Thraupidae).

Allison J Shultz1,2, Kevin J Burns1.   

Abstract

Males and females can be under different evolutionary pressures if sexual and natural selection is differentially operating in each sex. As a result, many species have evolved sexual dichromatism, or differences in coloration between sexes. Although sexual dichromatism is often used as an index of the magnitude of sexual selection, sexual dichromatism is a composite trait. Here, we examine the evolution of sexual dichromatism in one of the largest and most ecologically diverse families of birds, the tanagers, using the avian visual perspective and a species-level phylogeny. Our results demonstrate that the evolutionary decreases of sexual dichromatism are more often associated with larger and more frequent changes in male plumage coloration, and evolutionary increases are not more often associated with larger changes in either sex. Furthermore, we show that the crown and ventral plumage regions are correlated with sexual dichromatism in males, and that only male plumage complexity is positively correlated with sexual dichromatism. Finally, we demonstrate that light environment is important in shaping both plumage brilliance and complexity. By conducting a multilevel analysis of plumage evolution in males and females, we show that sexual dichromatism evolves via a mosaic of sexual and natural selection in both sexes.
© 2017 The Author(s). Evolution © 2017 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avian visual model; female plumage coloration; plumage complexity; sexual dichromatism; tanagers; ultraviolet coloration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28168699     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Sexual Dichromatism Drives Diversification within a Major Radiation of African Amphibians.

Authors:  Daniel M Portik; Rayna C Bell; David C Blackburn; Aaron M Bauer; Christopher D Barratt; William R Branch; Marius Burger; Alan Channing; Timothy J Colston; Werner Conradie; J Maximilian Dehling; Robert C Drewes; Raffael Ernst; Eli Greenbaum; Václav Gvoždík; James Harvey; Annika Hillers; Mareike Hirschfeld; Gregory F M Jongsma; Jos Kielgast; Marcel T Kouete; Lucinda P Lawson; Adam D Leaché; Simon P Loader; Stefan Lötters; Arie Van Der Meijden; Michele Menegon; Susanne Müller; Zoltán T Nagy; Caleb Ofori-Boateng; Annemarie Ohler; Theodore J Papenfuss; Daniela Rößler; Ulrich Sinsch; Mark-Oliver Rödel; Michael Veith; Jens Vindum; Ange-Ghislain Zassi-Boulou; Jimmy A McGuire
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Aggressive signaling among competing species of birds.

Authors:  Haley L Kenyon; Paul R Martin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Behavioral, morphological, and ecological trait evolution in two clades of New World Sparrows (Aimophila and Peucaea, Passerellidae).

Authors:  Carla Cicero; Nicholas A Mason; Lauryn Benedict; James D Rising
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Lack of conspecific visual discrimination between second-year males and females in the Saffron Finch.

Authors:  María Juliana Benítez Saldívar; Viviana Massoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Microstructures amplify carotenoid plumage signals in tanagers.

Authors:  Dakota E McCoy; Allison J Shultz; Charles Vidoudez; Emma van der Heide; Jacqueline E Dall; Sunia A Trauger; David Haig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Drivers of phenotypic divergence in a Mesoamerican highland bird.

Authors:  Sahid M Robles-Bello; Melisa Vázquez-López; Sandra M Ramírez-Barrera; Alondra K Terrones-Ramírez; Blanca E Hernández-Baños
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  The evolutionary history and mechanistic basis of female ornamentation in a tropical songbird.

Authors:  Erik D Enbody; Simon Y W Sin; Jordan Boersma; Scott V Edwards; Serena Ketaloya; Hubert Schwabl; Michael S Webster; Jordan Karubian
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Contrasting impacts of competition on ecological and social trait evolution in songbirds.

Authors:  Jonathan P Drury; Joseph A Tobias; Kevin J Burns; Nicholas A Mason; Allison J Shultz; Hélène Morlon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 8.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.