Literature DB >> 28168641

Towards standardised definitions of shoulder arthroplasty complications: a systematic review of terms and definitions.

Matthijs Jacxsens1, Theodor Walz1, Holger Durchholz2, Andreas M Müller1,2, Matthias Flury3, Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer3, Laurent Audigé4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A transparent, reliable and accurate reporting of complications is essential for an evidence-based evaluation of shoulder arthroplasty (SA). We systematically reviewed the literature for terms and definitions related to negative events associated with SA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Various biomedical databases were searched for reviews, clinical studies and case reports of complications associated with SA. Any general definition of a complication, classification system, all reported terms related to complications and negative events with their definitions were extracted. Terms were grouped and organised in a hierarchical structure. Definitions of negative events were tabulated and compared.
RESULTS: From 1086 initial references published between 2010 and 2014, 495 full-text papers were reviewed. Five reports provided a general definition of the term "surgical complication" and 29 used a classification system of complications. A total of 1399 extracted terms were grouped based on similarities and involved implant or anatomical parts. One hundred and six reports (21.4%) defined at least one negative event for 28 different terms. There were 64 definitions related to humeral or glenoid loosening, and 25 systems documenting periprosthetic radiolucency. Other definitions considered notching, stress shielding, implant failure and tuberosity malposition.
CONCLUSIONS: A clear standardised set of SA complication definitions is lacking. Few authors reported complications based on definitions mainly considering radiological criteria without clinical parameters. This review should initiate and support the development of a standardised SA complication core set.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Complications; Negative events; Shoulder; Standardisation; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28168641     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2635-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  3 in total

1.  Differences in total blood loss and transfusion rate between different indications for shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dominik Malcherczyk; Juliane Hack; Antonio Klasan; Asma Abdelmoula; Thomas J Heyse; Brandon Greene; Bilal F El-Zayat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Complications after surgical management of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of event terms and definitions.

Authors:  N Alispahic; S Brorson; C Bahrs; A Joeris; A Steinitz; L Audigé
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Core Set of Radiographic Parameters for Shoulder Arthroplasty Monitoring: Criteria Defined by an International Delphi Consensus Process.

Authors:  Holger Durchholz; Björn Salomonsson; Philipp Moroder; Simon Lambert; Richard Page; Laurent Audigé; John Sperling; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2019-10-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.