| Literature DB >> 28168160 |
Saroj Kumar1, Xia Liu2, Ferenc Borondics3, Qunfeng Xiao2, Renfei Feng2, Erik Goormaghtigh4, Fredrik Nikolajeff5.
Abstract
The microenvironment of a tumor changes chemically and morphologically during cancer progression. Cancer-stimulated fibroblasts promote tumor growth, however, the mechanism of the transition to a cancer-stimulated fibroblast remains elusive. Here, the multi-modal spectroscopic methods Fourier transform infrared imaging (FTIRI), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X-ray fluorescence imaging (XFI) are used to characterize molecular and atomic alterations that occur in cancer-stimulated fibroblasts. In addition to chemical changes in lipids (olefinic and acyl chain) and protein aggregation observed with FTIRI, a new infrared biomarker for oxidative stress in stimulated fibroblasts is reported. Oxidative stress is observed to cause lipid peroxidation, which leads to the appearance of a new band at 1721 cm-1, assigned to 4-hydroxynonenal. Complementary to FTIRI, XFI is well suited to determining atom concentrations and XAS can reveal the speciation of individual elements. XFI reveals increased concentrations of P, S, K, Ca within stimulated fibroblasts. Furthermore, XAS studies reveal alterations in the speciation of S and Ca in stimulated fibroblasts, which might provide insight into the mechanisms of cancer progression. Using XFI, not only is the concentration change of individual elements observed, but also the subcellular localization. This study demonstrates the wealth of biochemical information provided by a multi-modal imaging approach and highlights new avenues for future research into the microenvironment of breast tumors.Entities:
Keywords: Fourier transform infrared imaging; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; X-ray fluorescence imaging; cancer; fibroblasts
Year: 2017 PMID: 28168160 PMCID: PMC5288759 DOI: 10.1002/open.201600102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemistryOpen ISSN: 2191-1363 Impact factor: 2.911
Figure 1FTIR imaging of biochemical changes in cancer‐stimulated (SF) and normal (NF) fibroblasts. A) Upper panel: Brightfield microscopy image of a single fibroblast; lower panel: a typical IR image of a fibroblast generated by using the infrared absorbance at 1654 cm−1. B and C) Representative of the average second‐derivative (1750–1400 cm−1) spectra from the NFs (blue) and SF after 24 h (red) and 72 h (green) simulation. Arrows in panel B (left to right) indicate bands at 1735 and 1721 cm−1 from ν(C=O) of lipid ester and aldehyde, band in the amide I region at 1632 cm−1 from the aggregated protein (β‐sheets) and at 1440 cm−1 from the ν(C−H) of CH3 groups, respectively. Similarly, arrows in panel C indicate bands at 3010 cm−1 from olefinic ν(=CH) and at 2922 cm−1 from ν as(C−H) of the CH2 groups in the lipid acyl chain, respectively. D and E) Statistical analysis of the integrated area under the curve (IUPAC) for lipid (ester, acyl chain and olefinic), aldehyde and aggregated protein absorption bands. E) The value of lipid acyl chains in divided by a factor of 500 to simplify visual comparison. Statistical significance was determined from four replicates (n=5) with paired t‐test and 95 % confidence.
Second‐derivative FTIR spectral intensity analysis of relative levels of lipid peroxidation. Normal fibroblasts (NFs) and stimulated fibroblasts (SFs) exposed to breast cancer cells (MCF‐7) over different time periods. Data is shown as mean±SD (n=5). Significant differences were tested using a two‐tailed unpaired Student t‐test with a 95 % confidence limit (ρ<0.05).
| Cell line | Lipid ester (C=O vibration, 1755–1725 cm−1) | 4‐Hydroxynonenal (1725–1705 cm−1) |
|---|---|---|
| NF | (3±0.18)×10−2 | (1±0.05)×10−3 |
| SF (24 h) | (2.5±0.15)×10−2 | (7±0.35)×10−3 |
| SF (72 h) | (2±0.15)×10−2 | (11±0.65)×10−3 |
Figure 2K‐edge X‐ray absorption spectra (XAS) to observe the elemental concentration changes in cancer‐stimulated (SF) and normal (NF) fibroblasts. The spectra were normalized for visual representation. A) XAS spectra from element P, the concentration was 20 % higher in SFs than in NFs. B–D) Spectra were ratioed by the elemental change in P to avoid the thickness error.
Figure 3Representative analysis of calcium K‐edge XAS spectra collected from A) normal and B) cancer‐stimulated fibroblasts fitted to a linear combination of standard K‐edge XAS spectra. The normalized squares fit shown as the red line. The reference spectra of pure components (Figure 3 A) were scaled to their relative contribution to the fit. C) Calcium K‐edge X‐ray absorption spectra are representative of calcium species. All spectra were normalized to the height of the edge‐jump after background removal. Spectra were vertically scaled as indicated for clarity. D) Statistical analysis of the representative of the percentage calcium composition in cancer‐stimulated fibroblasts (SF) and normal fibroblast (NFs).
The values given are the percentage calcium (A) and sulfur (B) composition in stimulated (SFs) and normal fibroblast (NFs). The values in parentheses are the average estimated standard deviation from the individual fits (given as the last digit of the percentage), which are obtained from the diagonal elements of the covariance matrices and assuming a constant variance across the range of individual spectra. N.D.=Not determined.
| (A) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fibroblast | Ca2P2O7 | CaCO3 | Hydroxyapatite | Ca(OH)2 | CaO | ||||
| SF (72 h) | 35.9(8) | 29.3(6) | 23.7(5) | 10.9(4) | N.D. | ||||
| NF | 12.4(8) | 71.4(6) | 16.1(5) | N.D. | N.D. | ||||
Figure 4Representative analysis of sulfur K‐edge XAS spectrum collected from A) normal and B) cancer‐stimulated fibroblasts normalized to a linear combination of standard K‐edge XAS spectra. The normalized squares fit is shown as the red line. The reference spectra of pure components (Figure 3 B) were scaled to their relative contribution to the fit. C) Statistical analysis of the percentage calcium composition in cancer‐stimulated fibroblasts (SF) and normal fibroblasts (NF).
Figure 5X‐ray fluorescence imaging (XFI) elemental mapping of cancer‐stimulated (SF, upper panel) and normal (NF, lower panel) fibroblasts. Elemental maps of S, Ca and K of a single fibroblast from both the samples. The color bar shows the concentration and localization of these elements. Each pixel is 4×4 microns in size.