Literature DB >> 28167800

Learning, gustatory responsiveness and tyramine differences across nurse and forager honeybees.

Ricarda Scheiner1,2, Tina Reim2, Eirik Søvik3,4, Brian V Entler3, Andrew B Barron3, Markus Thamm5.   

Abstract

Honeybees are well known for their complex division of labor. Each bee sequentially performs a series of social tasks during its life. The changes in social task performance are linked to gross differences in behavior and physiology. We tested whether honeybees performing different social tasks (nursing versus foraging) would differ in their gustatory responsiveness and associative learning behavior in addition to their daily tasks in the colony. Further, we investigated the role of the biogenic amine tyramine and its receptors in the behavior of nurse bees and foragers. Tyramine is an important insect neurotransmitter, which has long been neglected in behavioral studies as it was believed to only act as the metabolic precursor of the better-known amine octopamine. With the increasing number of characterized tyramine receptors in diverse insects, we need to understand the functions of tyramine on its own account. Our findings suggest an important role for tyramine and its two receptors in regulating honeybee gustatory responsiveness, social organization and learning behavior. Foragers, which were more responsive to gustatory stimuli than nurse bees and performed better in appetitive learning, also differed from nurse bees in their tyramine brain titers and in the mRNA expression of a tyramine receptor in the brain. Pharmacological activation of tyramine receptors increased gustatory responsiveness of nurse bees and foragers and improved appetitive learning in nurse bees. These data suggest that a large part of the behavioral differences between honeybees may be directly linked to tyramine signaling in the brain.
© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera; Biogenic amines; Nurse bee; PER; Proboscis extension response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28167800     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.152496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  13 in total

1.  Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits.

Authors:  Chelsea N Cook; Thiago Mosqueiro; Colin S Brent; Cahit Ozturk; Jürgen Gadau; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Brian H Smith
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  The Effects of Fat Body Tyramine Level on Gustatory Responsiveness of Honeybees (Apis mellifera) Differ between Behavioral Castes.

Authors:  Ricarda Scheiner; Brian V Entler; Andrew B Barron; Christina Scholl; Markus Thamm
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-08

3.  How Tyramine β-Hydroxylase Controls the Production of Octopamine, Modulating the Mobility of Beetles.

Authors:  Li Xu; Hong-Bo Jiang; Xiao-Feng Chen; Ying Xiong; Xue-Ping Lu; Yu-Xia Pei; Guy Smagghe; Jin-Jun Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Verification of mathematical models of response threshold through statistical characterisation of the foraging activity in ant societies.

Authors:  Osamu Yamanaka; Masashi Shiraishi; Akinori Awazu; Hiraku Nishimori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Genotypic trade-off between appetitive and aversive capacities in honeybees.

Authors:  Pierre Junca; Lionel Garnery; Jean-Christophe Sandoz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  The Insect Type 1 Tyramine Receptors: From Structure to Behavior.

Authors:  Luca Finetti; Thomas Roeder; Girolamo Calò; Giovanni Bernacchia
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Active Inferants: An Active Inference Framework for Ant Colony Behavior.

Authors:  Daniel Ari Friedman; Alec Tschantz; Maxwell J D Ramstead; Karl Friston; Axel Constant
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Mating increases Drosophila melanogaster females' choosiness by reducing olfactory sensitivity to a male pheromone.

Authors:  Philip Kohlmeier; Ye Zhang; Jenke A Gorter; Chih-Ying Su; Jean-Christophe Billeter
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 19.100

9.  Sequence and structural properties of circular RNAs in the brain of nurse and forager honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Clemens Thölken; Markus Thamm; Christoph Erbacher; Marcus Lechner
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  In Vitro Rearing Changes Social Task Performance and Physiology in Honeybees.

Authors:  Felix Schilcher; Lioba Hilsmann; Lisa Rauscher; Laura Değirmenci; Markus Krischke; Beate Krischke; Markus Ankenbrand; Benjamin Rutschmann; Martin J Mueller; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Ricarda Scheiner
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.