Literature DB >> 28167798

Estrogen receptor α wields treatment-specific enhancers between morphologically similar endometrial tumors.

Marjolein Droog1, Ekaterina Nevedomskaya1,2, Gwen M Dackus1, Renske Fles1, Yongsoo Kim1,2, Harry Hollema3, Marian J Mourits4, Petra M Nederlof5, Hester H van Boven5, Sabine C Linn1,6, Flora E van Leeuwen7, Lodewyk F A Wessels2,8, Wilbert Zwart9.   

Abstract

The DNA-binding sites of estrogen receptor α (ERα) show great plasticity under the control of hormones and endocrine therapy. Tamoxifen is a widely applied therapy in breast cancer that affects ERα interactions with coregulators and shifts the DNA-binding signature of ERα upon prolonged exposure in breast cancer. Although tamoxifen inhibits the progression of breast cancer, it increases the risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women. We therefore asked whether the DNA-binding signature of ERα differs between endometrial tumors that arise in the presence or absence of tamoxifen, indicating divergent enhancer activity for tumors that develop in different endocrine milieus. Using ChIP sequencing (ChIP-seq), we compared the ERα profiles of 10 endometrial tumors from tamoxifen users with those of six endometrial tumors from nonusers and integrated these results with the transcriptomic data of 47 endometrial tumors from tamoxifen users and 64 endometrial tumors from nonusers. The ERα-binding sites in tamoxifen-associated endometrial tumors differed from those in the tumors from nonusers and had distinct underlying DNA sequences and divergent enhancer activity as marked by histone 3 containing the acetylated lysine 27 (H3K27ac). Because tamoxifen acts as an agonist in the postmenopausal endometrium, similar to estrogen in the breast, we compared ERα sites in tamoxifen-associated endometrial cancers with publicly available ERα ChIP-seq data in breast tumors and found a striking resemblance in the ERα patterns of the two tissue types. Our study highlights the divergence between endometrial tumors that arise in different hormonal conditions and shows that ERα enhancer use in human cancer differs in the presence of nonphysiological endocrine stimuli.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ChIP-seq; breast cancer; endometrial cancer; estrogen receptor; tamoxifen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28167798      PMCID: PMC5338442          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615233114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  48 in total

1.  Rapid immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry of endogenous proteins (RIME) for analysis of chromatin complexes.

Authors:  Hisham Mohammed; Christopher Taylor; Gordon D Brown; Evaggelia K Papachristou; Jason S Carroll; Clive S D'Santos
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Uniform, optimal signal processing of mapped deep-sequencing data.

Authors:  Vibhor Kumar; Masafumi Muratani; Nirmala Arul Rayan; Petra Kraus; Thomas Lufkin; Huck Hui Ng; Shyam Prabhakar
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  The first decade of estrogen receptor cistromics in breast cancer.

Authors:  Koen D Flach; Wilbert Zwart
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparative Cistromics Reveals Genomic Cross-talk between FOXA1 and ERα in Tamoxifen-Associated Endometrial Carcinomas.

Authors:  Marjolein Droog; Ekaterina Nevedomskaya; Yongsoo Kim; Tesa Severson; Koen D Flach; Mark Opdam; Karianne Schuurman; Patrycja Gradowska; Michael Hauptmann; Gwen Dackus; Harry Hollema; Marian Mourits; Petra Nederlof; Hester van Boven; Sabine C Linn; Lodewyk Wessels; Flora E van Leeuwen; Wilbert Zwart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Epigenetic repression of microRNA-129-2 leads to overexpression of SOX4 oncogene in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Huang; Joseph C Liu; Daniel E Deatherage; Jingqin Luo; David G Mutch; Paul J Goodfellow; David S Miller; Tim H-M Huang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Genetic instability of microsatellites in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  J I Risinger; A Berchuck; M F Kohler; P Watson; H T Lynch; J Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Estrogen-like effects of tamoxifen on human endometrial carcinoma transplanted into nude mice.

Authors:  P G Satyaswaroop; R J Zaino; R Mortel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Oestrogen receptor-co-factor-chromatin specificity in the transcriptional regulation of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wilbert Zwart; Vasiliki Theodorou; Marleen Kok; Sander Canisius; Sabine Linn; Jason S Carroll
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Enrichment Map - a Cytoscape app to visualize and explore OMICs pathway enrichment results.

Authors:  Ruth Isserlin; Daniele Merico; Veronique Voisin; Gary D Bader
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-07-01
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear receptors in cancer - uncovering new and evolving roles through genomic analysis.

Authors:  Vineet K Dhiman; Michael J Bolt; Kevin P White
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Exogenous ERα Expression in the Mammary Epithelium Decreases Over Time and Does Not Contribute to p53-Deficient Mammary Tumor Formation in Mice.

Authors:  Lisette M Cornelissen; Linda Henneman; Anne Paulien Drenth; Eva Schut; Roebi de Bruijn; Sjoerd Klarenbeek; Wilbert Zwart; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  Chromatin topology defines estradiol-primed progesterone receptor and PAX2 binding in endometrial cancer cells.

Authors:  Nicolás Bellora; François Le Dily; Alejandro La Greca; Rodrigo Jara; Ana Silvina Nacht; Javier Quilez Oliete; José Luis Villanueva; Enrique Vidal; Gabriela Merino; Cristóbal Fresno; Inti Tarifa Reischle; Griselda Vallejo; Guillermo Vicent; Elmer Fernández; Miguel Beato; Patricia Saragüeta
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  The Estrogen Receptor α Cistrome in Human Endometrium and Epithelial Organoids.

Authors:  Sylvia C Hewitt; San-Pin Wu; Tianyuan Wang; Madhumita Ray; Marja Brolinson; Steven L Young; Thomas E Spencer; Alan DeCherney; Francesco J DeMayo
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.051

5.  Macular Abnormalities Associated With 5α-Reductase Inhibitor.

Authors:  Yong Kyun Shin; Geun Woo Lee; Se Woong Kang; Sang Jin Kim; A Young Kim
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  ATX‑LPA axis facilitates estrogen‑induced endometrial cancer cell proliferation via MAPK/ERK signaling pathway.

Authors:  Guo Zhang; Yuan Cheng; Qi Zhang; Xiaoping Li; Jingwei Zhou; Jianliu Wang; Lihui Wei
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 7.  Estrogen Signaling in Endometrial Cancer: a Key Oncogenic Pathway with Several Open Questions.

Authors:  Adriana C Rodriguez; Zannel Blanchard; Kathryn A Maurer; Jason Gertz
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.869

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.