Literature DB >> 28167152

Prognostic Limitations of Donor T Cell Chimerism after Myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Eric Wong1, Kate Mason2, Jenny Collins2, Barbara Hockridge2, Janis Boyd2, Alexandra Gorelik3, Jeffrey Szer4, David S Ritchie4.   

Abstract

Donor T cell chimerism is associated with relapse outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, measures of statistical association do not adequately assess the performance of a prognostic biomarker, which is best characterized by its sensitivity and specificity for the chosen outcome. We analyzed donor T cell chimerism results at day 100 (D100chim) after myeloablative alloSCT for AML or MDS in 103 patients and determined its sensitivity and specificity for relapse-free survival at 6 months (RFS6) and 12 months (RFS12) post-alloSCT. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for RFS6 was .68, demonstrating only modest utility as a predictive biomarker, although this was greater than RFS12 at .62. Using a D100chim threshold of 65%, the specificity for RFS6 was 96.6%; however, sensitivity was poor at 26.7%. This equated to a negative predictive value of 88.5% and positive predictive value of 57.1%. Changing the threshold for D100chim to 75% or 85% modestly improved the sensitivity of D100chim for RFS6; however, this was at the expense of specificity. D100chim is specific but lacks sensitivity as a prognostic biomarker of early RFS after myeloablative alloSCT for AML or MDS. Caution is required when using D100chim to guide treatment decisions including immunologic manipulation, which may expose patients to unwarranted graft-versus-host disease.
Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Biomarker; Chimerism; Myelodysplastic syndrome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28167152     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.01.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  5 in total

1.  Recommendations for reporting post-transplant relapse in AML.

Authors:  A Rashidi; M A Linden; M-E Percival; B M Sandmaier; S Devine; D J Weisdorf
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Recipient BCL2 inhibition and NK cell ablation form part of a reduced intensity conditioning regime that improves allo-bone marrow transplantation outcomes.

Authors:  Yuhao Jiao; Joanne E Davis; Jai Rautela; Emma M Carrington; Mandy J Ludford-Menting; Wilford Goh; Rebecca B Delconte; Fernando Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes; Rachel Koldej; Daniel Gray; David Huang; Ben T Kile; Andrew M Lew; David S Ritchie; Nicholas D Huntington
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Editorial on Translational Research in Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) and Graft-Versus-Tumor (GVT) Effect After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Marie Czech; Robert Zeiser; Tomomi Toubai
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Joanne E Davis; Kelei Du; Mandy J Ludford-Menting; Ashvind Prabahran; Eric Wong; Nicholas D Huntington; Rachel M Koldej; David S Ritchie
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukaemia: a triumph of hope and experience.

Authors:  Justin Loke; Ram Malladi; Paul Moss; Charles Craddock
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 6.998

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.