Literature DB >> 28167050

Changing mutational and adaptive landscapes and the genesis of cancer.

L Alexander Liggett1, James DeGregori2.   

Abstract

By the time the process of oncogenesis has produced an advanced cancer, tumor cells have undergone extensive evolution. The cellular phenotypes resulting from this evolution have been well studied, and include accelerated growth rates, apoptosis resistance, immortality, invasiveness, and immune evasion. Yet with all of our current knowledge of tumor biology, the details of early oncogenesis have been difficult to observe and understand. Where different oncogenic mutations may work together to enhance the survival of a tumor cell, in isolation they are often pro-apoptotic, pro-differentiative or pro-senescent, and therefore often, somewhat paradoxically, disadvantageous to a cell. It is also becoming clear that somatic mutations, including those in known oncogenic drivers, are common in tissues starting at a young age. These observations raise the question: how do we largely avoid cancer for most of our lives? Here we propose that evolutionary forces can help explain this paradox. As humans and other organisms age or experience external insults such as radiation or smoking, the structure and function of tissues progressively degrade, resulting in altered stem cell niche microenvironments. As tissue integrity declines, it becomes less capable of supporting and maintaining resident stem cells. These stem cells then find themselves in a microenvironment to which they are poorly adapted, providing a competitive advantage to those cells that can restore their functionality and fitness through mutations or epigenetic changes. The resulting oncogenic clonal expansions then increase the odds of further cancer progression. Understanding how the causes of cancer, such as aging or smoking, affect tissue microenvironments to control the impact of mutations on somatic cell fitness can help reconcile the discrepancy between marked mutation accumulation starting early in life and the somatic evolution that leads to cancer at advanced ages or following carcinogenic insults. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Evolutionary principles - heterogeneity in cancer?, edited by Dr. Robert A. Gatenby.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fitness landscapes; Microenvironment; Mutation; Oncogenesis; Somatic cell evolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28167050      PMCID: PMC5557501          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer        ISSN: 0304-419X            Impact factor:   10.680


  136 in total

1.  Age-dependent induction of hepatic tumor regression by the tissue microenvironment after transplantation of neoplastically transformed rat liver epithelial cells into the liver.

Authors:  K D McCullough; W B Coleman; G J Smith; J W Grisham
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Viral oncogenes.

Authors:  J M Bishop
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Evolution of the mutation rate.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  The replication rate of human hematopoietic stem cells in vivo.

Authors:  Sandra N Catlin; Lambert Busque; Rosemary E Gale; Peter Guttorp; Janis L Abkowitz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Older age becomes common late in human evolution.

Authors:  Rachel Caspari; Sang-Hee Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Intrinsic tumor suppression and epithelial maintenance by endocytic activation of Eiger/TNF signaling in Drosophila.

Authors:  Tatsushi Igaki; Jose Carlos Pastor-Pareja; Hiroka Aonuma; Masayuki Miura; Tian Xu
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Tumor evolution. High burden and pervasive positive selection of somatic mutations in normal human skin.

Authors:  Iñigo Martincorena; Amit Roshan; Moritz Gerstung; Peter Ellis; Peter Van Loo; Stuart McLaren; David C Wedge; Anthony Fullam; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Jose M Tubio; Lucy Stebbings; Andrew Menzies; Sara Widaa; Michael R Stratton; Philip H Jones; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Stochastic modeling indicates that aging and somatic evolution in the hematopoetic system are driven by non-cell-autonomous processes.

Authors:  Andrii I Rozhok; Jennifer L Salstrom; James DeGregori
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  A two-stage theory of carcinogenesis in relation to the age distribution of human cancer.

Authors:  P ARMITAGE; R DOLL
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1957-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Attribution of Cancer Origins to Endogenous, Exogenous, and Preventable Mutational Processes.

Authors:  Vincent L Cannataro; Jeffrey D Mandell; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 8.800

2.  Baicalin, a Potent Inhibitor of NF-κB Signaling Pathway, Enhances Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells to Docetaxel and Inhibits Tumor Growth and Metastasis Both In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Anqi Zeng; Xin Liang; Shaomi Zhu; Chi Liu; Xiaohong Luo; Qinxiu Zhang; Linjiang Song
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Time-restricted feeding delays the emergence of the age-associated, neoplastic-prone tissue landscape.

Authors:  Monica Serra; Fabio Marongiu; Maria Giuseppina Pisu; Mariangela Serra; Ezio Laconi
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Somatic maintenance impacts the evolution of mutation rate.

Authors:  Andrii Rozhok; James DeGregori
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 5.  Relevance of Non-Targeted Effects for Radiotherapy and Diagnostic Radiology; A Historical and Conceptual Analysis of Key Players.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Andrej Rusin; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Tumour Initiation: a Discussion on Evidence for a "Load-Trigger" Mechanism.

Authors:  John J Evans; Maan M Alkaisi; Peter H Sykes
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.194

7.  Mutation signatures of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia and normal blood progenitors associated with differential patient outcomes.

Authors:  Arianne M Brandsma; Eline J M Bertrums; Markus J van Roosmalen; Damon A Hofman; Rurika Oka; Mark Verheul; Freek Manders; Joske Ubels; Mirjam E Belderbos; Ruben van Boxtel
Journal:  Blood Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-09

Review 8.  Relationship between Urban Green Spaces and Cancer: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Marion Porcherie; Nyan Linn; Anne Roué Le Gall; Marie-Florence Thomas; Emmanuelle Faure; Stéphane Rican; Jean Simos; Nicola Cantoreggi; Zoé Vaillant; Linda Cambon; Jean-Philippe Regnaux
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Playing cancer at its own game: activating mitogenic signaling as a paradoxical intervention.

Authors:  Matheus Henrique Dias; René Bernards
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.603

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.