Literature DB >> 28166976

Biopsy of bovine embryos produced in vivo and in vitro does not affect pregnancy rates.

Regivaldo Vieira de Sousa1, Célia Regina da Silva Cardoso2, Guilberth Butzke2, Margot Alves Nunes Dode3, Rodolfo Rumpf4, Maurício Machaim Franco5.   

Abstract

Assisted reproductive techniques have significantly contributed to animal breeding programs. Similarly, genomics has provided important information and tools to improve the accuracy of selection. However, the greatest benefits of those tools can only be expected when they are combined, allowing animals to be selected accurately early in life. Therefore, obtaining DNA samples from embryos without compromising their viability is essential for the consolidation of preimplantation genomic selection. We aimed to evaluate the effect on the gestation rate of conducting a biopsy of in vivo (VV) and in vitro-produced (IVP) bovine embryos. The VV and IVP embryos were distributed into two groups: VV-B (biopsied embryos; n = 380) and VV-C (intact embryos-controls; n = 229) and IVP-B (biopsied embryos; n = 91) and IVP-C (intact embryos-controls; n = 227), respectively. After biopsy, embryos from both groups VV-B and IVP-B were cultured for an additional 3 hours before being transferred to synchronized recipients. To evaluate the quality of the DNA obtained in the biopsies, this was used to determine the sex of embryos by polymerase chain reaction. No effect (P > 0.05) of the biopsy was observed for any of the treatments, the pregnancy rate at D 60 post-transfer being similar for VV-B: 206/380 (54.21%) and VV-C: 128/229 (55.89%) and for IVP-B: 24/91 (26.37%) and IVP-C: 45/227 (19.82%). Also, no effect (P > 0.05) of the embryo's stage of development was detected on percentage of pregnant recipients when in vitro embryos were transferred. From the biopsies analyzed, about 90% had the sex determined, confirming that DNA was there and it was efficiently amplified. The results indicated that biopsy does not affect the viability of IVV and IVP bovine embryos and can be used in commercial programs to associate assisted reproductive technologies with genomic selection.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Bovine; Embryo; Embryo viability; Genomic selection; Sex identification

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28166976     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  4 in total

1.  Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?

Authors:  Ligiane Oliveira Leme; Grazieli Marinheiro Machado; Andrei Antonioni Guedes Fidelis; Ana Luiza Silva Guimarães; José Felipe Warmiling Sprícigo; José Oliveira Carvalho; I Pivato; Maurício Machaim Franco; Margot Alves Nunes Dode
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Bovine epididymal spermatozoa treatment for in vitro fertilization: Heparin accelerates fertilization and enables a reduction in coincubation time.

Authors:  Andrielle T M Cunha; José O Carvalho; Ana L S Guimarães; Ligiane O Leme; Felippe M Caixeta; João H M Viana; Margot A N Dode
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Improved cryopreservation of in vitro produced bovine embryos using FGF2, LIF, and IGF1.

Authors:  Katy S Stoecklein; M Sofia Ortega; Lee D Spate; Clifton N Murphy; Randall S Prather
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Lipid profile of bovine grade-1 blastocysts produced either in vivo or in vitro before and after slow freezing process.

Authors:  Sarah Janati Idrissi; Daniel Le Bourhis; Antoine Lefevre; Patrick Emond; Laurene Le Berre; Olivier Desnoës; Thierry Joly; Samuel Buff; Virginie Maillard; Laurent Schibler; Pascal Salvetti; Sebastien Elis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.