Literature DB >> 28166892

A qualitative review of existing national and international occupational safety and health policies relating to occupational sedentary behaviour.

Pieter Coenen1, Nicholas Gilson2, Genevieve N Healy3, David W Dunstan4, Leon M Straker5.   

Abstract

Prolonged sedentary time is now recognised as an emergent ergonomics issue. We aimed to review current occupational safety and health policies relevant to occupational sedentary behaviour. An electronic search for documents was conducted on websites of ergonomics and occupational safety and health organisations from 10 countries and six international/pan-European agencies. Additionally, 43 informants (nine countries) were contacted and an international conference workshop held. 119 documents (e.g. legislation, guidelines, codes of practice) were identified. Using a qualitative synthesis, it was observed that many jurisdictions had legal frameworks establishing a duty of care for employers, designers/manufacturers/suppliers and employees. While no occupational authority policies focusing specifically on sedentary behaviour were found, relevant aspects of existing policies were identified. We highlight implications for ergonomics research and practice and recommend the development of policy to specifically address occupational sedentary behaviour and support workplace initiatives to assess and control the risks of this emergent hazard.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Occupational health; Policy; Qualitative research; Review; Sedentary behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28166892     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  7 in total

1.  Pre-existing low-back symptoms impact adversely on sitting time reduction in office workers.

Authors:  Pieter Coenen; Genevieve N Healy; Elisabeth A H Winkler; David W Dunstan; Neville Owen; Marj Moodie; Anthony D LaMontagne; Elizabeth A Eakin; Leon M Straker
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  The 'Goldilocks Principle': designing physical activity at work to be 'just right' for promoting health.

Authors:  Leon Straker; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Self-reported actual and desired proportion of sitting, standing, walking and physically demanding tasks of office employees in the workplace setting: do they fit together?

Authors:  Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich; Josephine Y Chau; Ingo Froboese
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-11-17

4.  Costing the economic burden of prolonged sedentary behaviours in France.

Authors:  Antoine Noël Racine; Irène Margaritis; Martine Duclos; François Carré; Anne Vuillemin; Christèle Gautier
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives of Factors That Influence Contact Centre Call Agents' Workplace Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour.

Authors:  Abigail Morris; Rebecca Murphy; Sam Shepherd; Lee Graves
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  A global systematic scoping review of studies analysing indicators, development, and content of national-level physical activity and sedentary behaviour policies.

Authors:  Bojana Klepac Pogrmilovic; Grant O'Sullivan; Karen Milton; Stuart J H Biddle; Adrian Bauman; Fiona Bull; Sonja Kahlmeier; Michael Pratt; Zeljko Pedisic
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Implementing a Physical Activity Promoting Program in a Flex-Office: A Process Evaluation with a Mixed Methods Design.

Authors:  Viktoria Wahlström; Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund; Mette Harder; Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm; Therese Eskilsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.