Literature DB >> 28166884

The sensitivity of a military-based occupational fitness test of muscular strength.

Kane J Middleton1, Greg L Carstairs2, Joanne N Caldwell3, Daniel C Billing2, Ben Beck4.   

Abstract

The risk of low back pain and injury during manual materials handling is increased if personnel are not physically capable of safely performing such tasks. To establish predictive relationships and develop a test cut-score, 69 participants performed a critical military lifting task to a 1.5-m platform (pack lift) and two task-related predictive tests (box lift to 1.5 m and 1.3 m). The pack lift was strongly correlated with both the 1.5-m (R2 = 0.85) and 1.3-m box lifts (R2 = 0.82). Both tests had similar sensitivity (range 0.85-0.94) with the 1.3-m test having higher specificity when compared with the 1.5-m lift. Increasing the test cut-score with the application of a safety factor increased the number of false positives and true negatives for both tests. Organisations must carefully assess their risk acceptance when applying safety factors to test cut-scores as the classification (pass/fail) of personnel may be affected.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ergonomics; Lifting; Physical employment standards; Specificity; Task-related predictive test

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28166884     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  1 in total

1.  Reliability and agreement of the IsoKai isokinetic lift test - A test used for admission to the Swedish Armed Forces.

Authors:  Tony Bohman; Matthias Tegern; Alexandra Halvarsson; Lisbet Broman; Helena Larsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.