| Literature DB >> 28166755 |
Oz Barazani1, Yoni Waitz2, Yizhar Tugendhaft3,4, Michael Dorman5, Arnon Dag3, Mohammed Hamidat6, Thameen Hijawi6, Zohar Kerem4, Erik Westberg7, Joachim W Kadereit7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A previous multi-locus lineage (MLL) analysis of SSR-microsatellite data of old olive trees in the southeast Mediterranean area had shown the predominance of the Souri cultivar (MLL1) among grafted trees. The MLL analysis had also identified an MLL (MLL7) that was more common among rootstocks than other MLLs. We here present a comparison of the MLL combinations MLL1 (scion)/MLL7 (rootstock) and MLL1/MLL1 in order to investigate the possible influence of rootstock on scion phenotype.Entities:
Keywords: Akaike information criterion (AIC) selection model; Environmental conditions; Multi-locus lineage analysis; Olive oil quality; Selection
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28166755 PMCID: PMC5295185 DOI: 10.1186/s12898-017-0114-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol ISSN: 1472-6785 Impact factor: 2.964
Environmental data of the investigated groves arranged along an aridity gradient; GDD data for ASH is missing
| Geographic region | CaCO3 (%) | Soil type | GDD | Average annual rainfall (mm) | Elevation (m a.s.l.) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YRM | Galilee | 25.67 | Terra Rosa | 3365 | 324.90 | 341.67 |
| YRR | Galilee | 25.67 | Terra Roas | 3365 | 324.90 | 341.67 |
| RAI | Galilee | 2.00 | Terra Rosa | 3655 | 391.60 | 379.92 |
| RAR | Galilee | 2.67 | Terra Rosa | 3736 | 391.60 | 347.13 |
| ZAL | Galilee | 4.33 | Terra Rosa | 4002 | 391.60 | 92.69 |
| DIH | Galilee | 34.00 | Terra Rosa | 3769 | 391.60 | 385.75 |
| KAM | Galilee | 18.67 | Terra Rosa | 3631 | 391.60 | 329.75 |
| KZE | Galilee | 8.00 | Heavy soil | 4014 | 391.60 | 111.38 |
| MAK | Carmel | 14.00 | Terra Rosa | 3425 | 388.90 | 84.27 |
| EJB | Samaria | 57.67 | Terra Rosa | 2861 | 317.50 | 248.49 |
| ETS | Samaria | 28.33 | Rendzina | 3745 | 454.50 | 242.04 |
| EWIK | Samaria | 37.00 | Terra Rosa | 3738 | 454.50 | 339.05 |
| ETD | Samaria | 45.33 | Terra Rosa | 3786 | 454.50 | 337.72 |
| EQA | Samaria | 55.33 | Terra Rosa | 3573 | 408.10 | 286.00 |
| ENZ | Samaria | 48.67 | Terra Rosa | 3446 | 356.10 | 373.01 |
| ENB | Samaria | 37.67 | Heavy soil | 2481 | 356.10 | 522.56 |
| ESB | Samaria | 38.67 | Terra Rosa | 3372 | 408.10 | 289.72 |
| ESK | Samaria | 41.00 | Terra Rosa | 3124 | 408.10 | 337.72 |
| ERK | Samaria | 38.00 | Rendzina | 2709 | 466.10 | 460.75 |
| HAD | Inner plain | 35.33 | Rendzina | 3821 | 276.00 | 111.17 |
| ERB | Judean Mts | 54.33 | Rendzina | 3334 | 466.10 | 439.33 |
| EJBA | Judean Mts. | 33.67 | Terra Rosa | 2650 | 382.90 | 575.53 |
| JER | Judean Mts. | 46.00 | Terra Rosa | 4077 | 353.40 | 723.71 |
| EIK | Judean Mts. | 15.33 | Terra Rosa | 3297 | 382.90 | 630.54 |
| YAL | Judean Mts. | 38.67 | Terra Rosa | 3350 | 287.10 | 615.27 |
| EBB | Judean Mts. | 33.00 | Terra Rosa | 2133 | 359.70 | 726.96 |
| AZK | Inner plain | 39.33 | Rendzina | 3650 | 320.40 | 272.65 |
| BNR | Inner plain | 24.33 | Rendzina | 3714 | 320.40 | 292.64 |
| EHS | Judean Mts. | 25.33 | Terra Rosa | 2898 | 301.40 | 547.66 |
| ASH | Coastal plain | 34.33 | Sand | – | 193.90 | 23.65 |
| AMZ | Inner plain | 42.00 | Rendzina | 3608 | 344.50 | 328.08 |
Fig. 1Map showing the sampled groves (c.f. Table 1) and the ratio between trees of the MLL1/MLL7 and MLL1/MLL1 scion/sucker combinations (GG1:GG2) at each site; the different colours illustrate the ratio between the two groups, ranging from yellow (dominance of GG1 trees) to brown (dominance of GG2 trees)
Linear regression between environmental parameters and the relative number of old olive trees belonging to GG1 and GG2
| GG1 | GG2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Average rainfall | 0.1960 | 7.0680 | 0.0126 | 0.1928 | 6.9290 | 0.0135 |
| Elevation | 4.26 × 10−5 | 0.0012 | 0.9722 | 0.1148 | 3.7610 | 0.0623 |
| GDD | 0.01120 | 0.3285 | 0.5710 | 0.0061 | 0.1716 | 0.6818 |
| Calcium | 0.07734 | 2.4310 | 0.1298 | 0.0211 | 0.6257 | 0.4353 |
Fig. 2Relative proportions of trees belonging to GG1 and GG2 along an aridity gradient showing the predominance of trees of GG1 in groves in geographic locations with relatively higher average annual rainfall and their absence from the driest groves (a). Relation between average annual rainfall and the proportion of trees of GG1 (b) and GG2 (c); the relative number of trees was calculated from the total number of trees at each site (i.e. including all three categories: GG1, GG2 and GG3)
Predicted direction of influence for the effects of environmental variables on the phenotypic traits of the investigated trees belonging to GG1 and GG2; model summaries are provided in Additional file 3
Positive and negative association is given by the coefficients of the most parsimonious model (Additional file 3) for the given trait as either positive (+ green cells), negative (− red cells) or zero (blank grey cells; when the variable was not present in the final model). Interaction between genotype combination and environmental effects is indicated by the differences between the two columns for a given environmental variable. For example, the effect of CaCO3 on peroxide value is positive in GG1 but negative in GG2 due to the presence of an interaction term in the final model
*Results of general linear model explaining the effect of genotype combination on phenotypic traits