| Literature DB >> 28166229 |
Yahui Zhang1, Wenchao Zang2, Lumei Qin3,4, Lei Zheng1, Ying Cao1, Zhenguang Yan1, Xianliang Yi5, Honghu Zeng4, Zhengtao Liu1.
Abstract
The bioavailability and toxicity of metals to aquatic organisms are highly dependent on water quality parameters in freshwaters. The biotic ligand model (BLM) for copper is an approach to generate the water quality criteria (WQC) with water chemistry in the ambient environment. However, few studies were carried out on the WQCs for copper based on the BLM approach in China. In the present study, the toxicity for copper to native Chinese aquatic organisms was conducted and the published toxicity data with water quality parameters to Chinese aquatic species were collected to derive the WQCs for copper by the BLM approach. The BLM-based WQCs (the criterion maximum criteria (CMC) and the criterion continuous concentration (CCC)) for copper in the freshwater for the nation and in the Taihu Lake were obtained. The CMC and CCC values for copper in China were derived to be 1.391 μg/L and 0.495 μg/L, respectively, and the CMC and CCC in the Taihu Lake were 32.194 μg/L and 9.697 μg/L. The high concentration of dissolved organic carbon might be a main reason which resulted in the higher WQC values in the Taihu Lake. The WQC of copper in the freshwater would provide a scientific foundation for water quality standards and the environment risk assessment in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28166229 PMCID: PMC5293193 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The acute toxicity and chronic toxicity to seven native aquatic organisms and the water parameters in the tests.
| No. | Species | Concentrations in the acute toxicity test (mg/L) | Concentrations in the chronic toxicity test (μg/L) | Hardness (mg/L CaCO3) | Temp(°C) | pH | Ca (mg/L) | Mg (mg/L) | Na (mg/L) | K (mg/L) | SO42– (mg/L) | Cl−(mg/L) | Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3) | 96h LC50 (mg/L) | 28d LOEC(μg/L) | 28d NOEC(μg/L) | EC20 (μg/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.32, 0.64 | — | 253 | 18.6 | 7.78 | 80.1818 | 12.1649 | 17.7074 | 3.0158 | 48.0690 | 73.6497 | 44 | 0.417(0.333–0.499) | — | — | — | ||
| 2 | 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 1.0, 1.2, 1.6 | — | 248 | 18.5 | 7.84 | 80.1818 | 12.1649 | 17.7074 | 3.0158 | 48.0690 | 73.6497 | 46 | 0.912(0.785–1.062) | — | — | — | ||
| 3 | 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 1.0, 1.2, 1.6 | — | 238 | 18.4 | 7.73 | 80.1818 | 12.1649 | 17.7074 | 3.0158 | 48.0690 | 73.6497 | 47 | 0.347(0.287–0.406) | — | — | — | ||
| 4 | 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4 | 0, 7, 14, 70, 140, 700 | 248 | 18.5 | 7.85 | 80.1818 | 12.1649 | 17.7074 | 3.0158 | 48.0690 | 73.6497 | 49 | 1.405(1.169–1.703) | 70 | 14 | 67.308 | ||
| 5 | 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.32,0.64 | 0, 0.12, 0.24, 1.2, 2.4, 12.0 | 256 | 19.1 | 7.81 | 80.1818 | 12.1649 | 17.7074 | 3.0158 | 48.0690 | 73.6497 | 45 | 0.024(0.018–0.030) | 2.4 | 1.2 | 2.510 | ||
| 6 | 0, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, 3.0, 3.6, 4.2 | — | 251 | 18.4 | 7.74 | 80.1818 | 12.1649 | 17.7074 | 3.0158 | 48.0690 | 73.6497 | 42 | 1.504(1.354–1.639) | — | — | — | ||
| 7 | 0, 1, 10, 100, 500, 1000,10000 | — | 251 | 18.5 | 7.74 | 80.1818 | 12.1649 | 17.7074 | 3.0158 | 48.0690 | 73.6497 | 42 | >10000 | — | — | — | ||
Fig 1Sampling sites in Taihu Lake of China.
The final acute values and criteria calculations using the water quality parameters (national (left) and Taihu Lake(right)).
| R | Species | SMAV (μg/L) | GMAV (μg/L) | SACRs | R | Species | SMAV(μg/L) | GMAV (μg/L) | SACRs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | > 846845.855 | > 846845.855 | 13 | > 489624.771 | > 489624.771 | ||||
| 14 | 2231.410 | 2231.410 | 12 | 4896.248 | 4896.248 | ||||
| 13 | 1112.011 | 1112.011 | 11 | 3971.316 | 3971.316 | 20.87 | |||
| 12 | 846.846 | 846.846 | 20.87 | 10 | 2815.101 | 2815.101 | |||
| 11 | 594.896 | 594.896 | 9 | 1687.535 | 1687.535 | ||||
| 10 | 310.449 | 310.449 | 8 | 1623.984 | 1623.984 | ||||
| 9 | 310.106 | 310.106 | 7 | 1401.922 | 1401.922 | ||||
| 8 | 259.195 | 259.195 | 6 | 1292.327 | 1292.327 | ||||
| 7 | 223.852 | 223.852 | 5 | 646.369 | 646.369 | ||||
| 6 | 86.414 | 86.414 | 4 | 450.051 | 450.051 | ||||
| 5 | 48.413 | 48.413 | 3 | 366.534 | 366.534 | 9.56 | |||
| 4 | 34.646 | 34.646 | 9.56 | 2 | 115.109 | 115.109 | 2.85 | ||
| 3 | 40.130 | 31.848 | 2.88 | 1 | 111.980 | 111.980 | 3.42 | ||
| 22.930 | |||||||||
| 35.104 | |||||||||
| 2 | 5.934 | 5.934 | 2.85 | ||||||
| 1 | 5.927 | 5.927 | 3.42 | ||||||
| FACR = 5.62 FAV = 2.782 μg/L CMC = 1.391 μg/L CCC = FAV/FACR = 0.495 μg/L | FACR = 6.64 FAV = 64.391μg/L CMC = 32.195 μg/L CCC = FAV/FACR = 9.697μg/L | ||||||||
Fig 2The water quality parameters and exposure concentration of copper in Taihu Lake.