Large elastic arteries stiffen with age, which predisposes older adults to increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Aerobic exercise training is known to reduce the risk for cardiovascular disease, but the optimal exercise prescription for attenuating large elastic arterial stiffening in older adults is not known. PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the effect of all-extremity high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) and carotid artery compliance in older adults. METHODS:Forty-nine sedentary older adults (age = 64 ± 1 yr), free of overt major clinical disease, were randomized to HIIT (n = 17), MICT (n = 18), or nonexercise controls (CONT; n = 14). HIIT (4 × 4 min at 90% HRpeak interspersed with 3 × 3 min active recovery at 70% HRpeak) and isocaloric MICT (70% HRpeak) were performed on an all-extremity non-weight-bearing ergometer, 4 d·wk for 8 wk under supervision. Aortic (carotid to femoral PWV [cfPWV]) and common carotid artery compliance were assessed at pre- and postintervention. RESULTS:cfPWV improved by 0.5 m·s in MICT (P = 0.04) but did not significantly change in HIIT and CONT (P > 0.05). Carotid artery compliance improved by 0.03 mm·mm Hg in MICT (P = 0.001), but it remained unchanged in HIIT and CONT (P > 0.05). Improvements in arterial stiffness in response to MICT were not confounded by changes in aortic or brachial blood pressure, HR, body weight, total and abdominal adiposity, blood lipids, or aerobic fitness. CONCLUSION: All-extremity MICT, but not HIIT, improved central arterial stiffness in previously sedentary older adults free of major clinical disease. Our findings have important implications for aerobic exercise prescription in older adults.
RCT Entities:
Large elastic arteries stiffen with age, which predisposes older adults to increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Aerobic exercise training is known to reduce the risk for cardiovascular disease, but the optimal exercise prescription for attenuating large elastic arterial stiffening in older adults is not known. PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the effect of all-extremity high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) and carotid artery compliance in older adults. METHODS: Forty-nine sedentary older adults (age = 64 ± 1 yr), free of overt major clinical disease, were randomized to HIIT (n = 17), MICT (n = 18), or nonexercise controls (CONT; n = 14). HIIT (4 × 4 min at 90% HRpeak interspersed with 3 × 3 min active recovery at 70% HRpeak) and isocaloric MICT (70% HRpeak) were performed on an all-extremity non-weight-bearing ergometer, 4 d·wk for 8 wk under supervision. Aortic (carotid to femoral PWV [cfPWV]) and common carotid artery compliance were assessed at pre- and postintervention. RESULTS: cfPWV improved by 0.5 m·s in MICT (P = 0.04) but did not significantly change in HIIT and CONT (P > 0.05). Carotid artery compliance improved by 0.03 mm·mm Hg in MICT (P = 0.001), but it remained unchanged in HIIT and CONT (P > 0.05). Improvements in arterial stiffness in response to MICT were not confounded by changes in aortic or brachial blood pressure, HR, body weight, total and abdominal adiposity, blood lipids, or aerobic fitness. CONCLUSION: All-extremity MICT, but not HIIT, improved central arterial stiffness in previously sedentary older adults free of major clinical disease. Our findings have important implications for aerobic exercise prescription in older adults.
Authors: Kerrie L Moreau; Anthony J Donato; Douglas R Seals; Christopher A DeSouza; Hirofumi Tanaka Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: M H Hwang; J K Yoo; H K Kim; C L Hwang; K Mackay; O Hemstreet; W W Nichols; D D Christou Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: P T Katzmarzyk; J Gagnon; A S Leon; J S Skinner; J H Wilmore; D C Rao; C Bouchard Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Inga E Schjerve; Gjertrud A Tyldum; Arnt E Tjønna; Tomas Stølen; Jan P Loennechen; Harald E M Hansen; Per M Haram; Garreth Heinrich; Anja Bye; Sonia M Najjar; Godfrey L Smith; Stig A Slørdahl; Ole J Kemi; Ulrik Wisløff Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: Xuemei Sui; Michael J LaMonte; James N Laditka; James W Hardin; Nancy Chase; Steven P Hooker; Steven N Blair Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Tomas Vikner; Anders Eklund; Nina Karalija; Jan Malm; Katrine Riklund; Ulman Lindenberger; Lars Bäckman; Lars Nyberg; Anders Wåhlin Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Catherine F S Marriott; Andrea F M Petrella; Emily C S Marriott; Narlon C Boa Sorte Silva; Robert J Petrella Journal: Sports Med Open Date: 2021-07-19