Literature DB >> 28165760

Comparison of ACL Strain in the MCL-Deficient and MCL-Reconstructed Knee During Simulated Landing in a Cadaveric Model.

Eric J Mancini1, Robert Kohen1, Amanda O Esquivel1, Allison M Cracchiolo1, Stephen Edward Lemos1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after valgus landing has been reported and studied biomechanically. However, the role of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) in dissipating these forces has not been fully elucidated. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role that the MCL plays in ACL strain during simulated landing. The hypothesis was that ACL strain would increase significantly in MCL-incompetent knees compared with the native knee and that reconstructing the MCL would return the values to those of the intact knee. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were used in this study. A materials testing machine applied a force of 2× body weight over 60 milliseconds to simulate landing after a jump. The knees were tested in 12 loading conditions, consisting of full extension or 15° of flexion combined with 7° of valgus or neutral alignment while the tibia was in external rotation, neutral rotation, or internal rotation. This test procedure was repeated on each specimen with the MCL transected and reconstructed. The superficial and deep MCL was transected along with the posterior oblique ligament, which was thought to simulate a worst case scenario. The MCL was reconstructed by use of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts.
RESULTS: During internal rotation at 0° of flexion and 0° of valgus, both the intact ( P = .005) and the reconstructed ( P = .004) MCL states placed significantly lower strain on the ACL than did the transected MCL. The reconstructed MCL state at 0° of flexion and 7° of valgus ( P = .049) along with 15° of flexion and 0° of valgus ( P = .020) also placed significantly lower strain on the ACL than did the transected MCL. For external rotation testing at 0° of flexion and 7° of valgus, the reconstructed MCL state placed significantly lower strain on the ACL than did the transected MCL ( P = .039). Finally, during neutral rotation, the ACL strain at 0° of valgus and 0° of flexion, and at 7° of valgus and 0° of flexion was significantly lower for the MCL-intact groups ( P < .028) and MCL-reconstructed groups ( P < .016) than the MCL-transected groups.
CONCLUSION: The current findings demonstrate that during valgus landing, a knee with an incompetent MCL puts the ACL under increased strain. These values are highest in full extension with the tibia in internal and neutral rotation. This increased strain can be reduced to baseline levels with reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A knee with an incompetent MCL puts the ACL under increased strain. Once the MCL has healed in an elongated manner, MCL reconstruction should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL strain; MCL reconstruction; MCL tear; knee biomechanics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28165760     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516685312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  9 in total

1.  The superficial medial collateral ligament is the major restraint to anteromedial instability of the knee.

Authors:  Guido Wierer; Danko Milinkovic; James R Robinson; Michael J Raschke; Andreas Weiler; Christian Fink; Mirco Herbort; Christoph Kittl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Osseous valgus alignment and posteromedial ligament complex deficiency lead to increased ACL graft forces.

Authors:  Julian Mehl; Alexander Otto; Cameron Kia; Matthew Murphy; E Obopilwe; Florian B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Andreas B Imhoff; Robert A Arciero; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparison between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions for knee with grade 2 medial collateral ligament injury.

Authors:  Lian-Xu Chen; Hong-Hong Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Sex-Based Differences of Medial Collateral Ligament and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Strains With Cadaveric Impact Simulations.

Authors:  Nathan D Schilaty; Nathaniel A Bates; Christopher V Nagelli; Aaron J Krych; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-04-12

5.  Posterior Lateral Meniscal Root Tears Increase Strain on the Reconstructed Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  William Uffmann; Neal ElAttrache; Trevor Nelson; Sam A Eberlein; Juntian Wang; Daniel R Howard; Melodie F Metzger
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-03

6.  MCL Reconstruction Using a Flat Tendon Graft for Anteromedial and Posteromedial Instability.

Authors:  Elisabeth Abermann; Guido Wierer; Mirco Herbort; Robert Smigielski; Christian Fink
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-02-08

7.  Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Gracilis Tenodesis for Anteromedial Knee Instability.

Authors:  Guido Wierer; Christoph Kittl; Christian Fink; Andreas Weiler
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-07-14

8.  Suture Tape Augmentation Increases the Time-Zero Stiffness and Strength of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Stephen J Torres; Trevor J Nelson; Nathalie Pham; William Uffmann; Orr Limpisvasti; Melodie F Metzger
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-28

9.  Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using a Single Achilles Tendon Allograft.

Authors:  Robert A Gallo; Gery Kozlansky; Nicholas Bonazza; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-10-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.