Literature DB >> 28165660

Comparison of elastic properties of open-cell metallic biomaterials with different unit cell types.

Reza Hedayati1,2, Mojtaba Sadighi1, Mohammad Mohammadi-Aghdam1, Hossein Hosseini-Toudeshky3.   

Abstract

Additive manufacturing techniques have made it possible to create open-cell porous structures with arbitrary micro-geometrical characteristics. Since a wide range of micro-geometrical features is available for making an implant, having a comprehensive knowledge of the mechanical response of cellular structures is very useful. In this study, finite element simulations have been carried out to investigate the effect of structure unit cell type (cube, rhombic dodecahedron, Kelvin, Weaire-Phelan, and diamond), cross-section type (circular, square, and triangular), strut length, and relative density on the Young's modulus, shear modulus, yield stress, shear yield stress, and Poisson's ratio of open-cell tessellated cellular structures. It was desired to see whether or not and to what extent each of the aforementioned parameters affect the mechanical properties of a porous structure. It was seen that the strut cross-section type does not have a considerable effect on the structure Young's modulus while its effect on the structure yield stress is significant. The strut length was not effective on the mechanical properties if the relative density was kept constant. It was also observed that the structure unit cell type and relative density have a considerable effect on the elastic properties. The highest and the lowest stiffness and strength belonged to the cube and diamond unit cell types, respectively. The rhombic dodecahedron structure with circular cross-section had a high yielding strength (second among all the cases) while its Young's modulus was relatively low. Therefore, it is the best choice for applications with low stiffness requirements, such as biomedical implants.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 386-398, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  Kelvin; Weaire-Phelan; additive manufacturing; open-cell foams; porous biomaterials; rhombic dodecahedron

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28165660     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  5 in total

1.  Mechanobiological Approach to Design and Optimize Bone Tissue Scaffolds 3D Printed with Fused Deposition Modeling: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Gianluca Percoco; Antonio Emmanuele Uva; Michele Fiorentino; Michele Gattullo; Vito Modesto Manghisi; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Design Optimization of Lattice Structures under Compression: Study of Unit Cell Types and Cell Arrangements.

Authors:  Kwang-Min Park; Kyung-Sung Min; Young-Sook Roh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current and Future of Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare.

Authors:  Victor M Villapún; Luke N Carter; Steven Avery; Alba González-Álvarez; James W Andrews; Sophie Cox
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2022-06-29

4.  Surface Free Energy Dominates the Biological Interactions of Postprocessed Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V.

Authors:  Victor Manuel Villapun Puzas; Luke N Carter; Christian Schröder; Paula E Colavita; David A Hoey; Mark A Webber; Owen Addison; Duncan E T Shepherd; Moataz M Attallah; Liam M Grover; Sophie C Cox
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2022-09-20

5.  Cell Seeding Process Experiment and Simulation on Three-Dimensional Polyhedron and Cross-Link Design Scaffolds.

Authors:  Ziyu Liu; Maryam Tamaddon; Yingying Gu; Jianshu Yu; Nan Xu; Fangli Gang; Xiaodan Sun; Chaozong Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.