| Literature DB >> 28165411 |
Juan Domínguez-Robles1, Rafael Sánchez2, Eduardo Espinosa3, Davide Savy4, Pierluigi Mazzei5, Alessandro Piccolo6, Alejandro Rodríguez7.
Abstract
Some agricultural residues such as wheat or barley straw, as well as certain fast-growing plants like Leucaena leucocephala and Chamaecytisus proliferus, could be used as raw materials for the paper industry as an alternative to traditional plants (eucalyptus, pine, etc.). In the present study, four types of lignin obtained from the spent liquors produced by the pulping processes using the abovementioned feedstocks were isolated and characterized. Lignin samples were acquired through an acid precipitation from these spent liquors. The characterization of the precipitated lignin samples were performed using a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and both liquid- and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) to analyse the chemical structure, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) for determining the thermal properties. Additionally, chemical composition of lignin fractions was also measured. Even though they were of different botanical origin, all the studied samples except for wheat straw lignin had a similar chemical composition and thermal behaviour, and identical chemical structure. Wheat straw lignin showed a greater amount of Klason lignin and lower carbohydrate content. Furthermore, this lignin sample showed a higher thermal stability and significantly different cross-peak patterns in the 2D-NMR experiments. The molecular structures corresponding to p-coumarate (PCA), ferulate (FA) and cinnamyl aldehyde end-groups (J) were only detected in wheat isolated lignin.Entities:
Keywords: agricultural residues; alkaline extraction; physico-chemical properties; soda lignin; spent liquors; structural elucidation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28165411 PMCID: PMC5343863 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18020327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Scheme of lignin isolation. AQ, Anthraquinone; BLs, black liquors; WS, wheat straw; BS, barley straw; LL, Leucaena leucocephala; CP, Chamaecytisus proliferus.
Physicochemical properties of the black liquors derived from the different raw materials.
| Parameters | Soda Wheat Straw BL 1 | Soda Barley Straw BL 1 | Soda-AQ 3
| Soda-AQ 3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 10.72 ± 0.16 | 10.24 ± 0.011 | 9.85 ± 0.005 | 10.47 ± 0.006 |
| Density (g/mL) | 1.011 ± 0.002 | 1.004 ± 0.007 | 1.021 ± 0.002 | 1.017 ± 0.003 |
| Total Dry Solids (g/L) | 32.57 ± 0.13 | 45.67 ± 0.21 | 55.80 ± 0.21 | 51.74 ± 0.93 |
| Ash (g/L) | 15.99 ± 0.42 | 16.77 ± 1.22 | 23.69 ± 0.33 | 20.84 ±1.60 |
| Lignin (g/L) | 11.6 | 12.6 | 24.3 | 19.0 |
| Total monosaccharides (g/L) | 3.812 | 4.004 | 4.239 | 5.049 |
| Glucose (g/L) | 0.127 | 0.211 | 1.237 | 0.262 |
| Xylose (g/L) | 1.682 | 2.814 | 1.781 | 2.624 |
| Arabinose (g/L) | 0.706 | 0.240 | 0.428 | 0.649 |
| Acetyl groups (g/L) | 1.297 | 0.739 | 0.792 | 1.514 |
| HMF 2 (g/L) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Furfural (g/L) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Electrical conductivity (mS/cm) | 14.63 ± 0.01 | 13.007 ± 0.005 | 21.7 ± 0.42 | 21.4 ± 0.06 |
1 Black liquors; 2 Hydroxymethylfurfural; 3 Anthraquinone.
Yield and composition of lignin samples.
| Sample | Yield of Precipitated Fractions | Yield as Pure Lignin (% Lignin/BL 1) | Chemical Composition of Precipitated Fractions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g/L BL 1) | As Pure Lignin (g/L BL 1) | KL 2 | ASL 3 | Carb 4 | Ash | ||
| (% of o.d.m.) | |||||||
| Wheat straw | 18.25 | 12.56 | 108.28 | 64.90 | 3.91 | 2.76 | 29.25 |
| Barley straw | 18.48 | 9.93 | 78.81 | 49.46 | 4.25 | 12.27 | 18.45 |
| 26.62 | 14.66 | 60.33 | 47.74 | 7.34 | 11.44 | 19.47 | |
| 22.95 | 13.95 | 73.42 | 52.23 | 8.56 | 12.25 | 15.59 | |
1 Black liquors; 2 Klason lignin; 3 Acid soluble lignin; 4 Carbohydrates.
Figure 2Thermogravimetric (TG) curves of lignin samples obtained from a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). BS_Soda Lignin, CP_Soda-AQ Lignin, WS_Soda Lignin and LL_Soda-AQ Lignin refer to the lignin samples isolated from barley straw, Chamaecytisus proliferus, wheat straw and Leucaena leucocephala, respectively.
Figure 3DTG curves of lignin samples obtained from a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). BS_Soda Lignin, CP_Soda-AQ Lignin, WS_Soda Lignin and LL_Soda-AQ Lignin refer to the lignin samples isolated from barley straw, Chamaecytisus proliferus, wheat straw and Leucaena leucocephala, respectively.
Thermogravimetric parameters of the different lignin samples.
| Sample | Tonset (°C) | DTGmax (°C) | Residue (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 WS_Soda Lignin | 220 | 342/−0.1339 | 780 | 46.1 |
| 2 BS_Soda Lignin | 207 | 310/−0.1796 | 552 | 42.7 |
| 3 CP_Soda-AQ Lignin | 209 | 310/−0.1811 | 548 | 46.0 |
| 4 LL_Soda-AQ Lignin | 208 | 320/−0.1732 | 672 | 47.0 |
1 Wheat straw; 2 barley straw; 3 Chamaecytisus proliferus; 4 Leucaena leucocephala.
Figure 4FT-IR Spectra of the four lignin samples (A); and a magnification of 1760–400 cm−1 region (B).
Figure 513C-CPMAS solid-state NMR spectra of lignin samples from wheat and Chamaecytisus lignin extracts. Spectra for lignin isolated from Leucaena and barley are shown in Figure S1 (Supplementary Materials), due to their close similarities with the spectrum of Chamaecytisus lignin.
Figure 613C-1H 2D-HSQC NMR spectra of alkyl-oxidized (δC/δH 50–90/2.5–6.0 ppm) and aromatic (δC/δH 90–106/6.0–8.0 ppm) regions of lignins isolated from Chamaecytisus proliferus (A,B) and wheat (C,D), respectively. Spectra for lignins isolated from Leucaena and barley are shown in Figure S2 (Supplementary Materials), due to their close similarities with the spectrum of Chamaecytisus lignin. Labels refer to identified lignin sub-units (shown in Figure 7), whose signal assignment is reported in Table 5.
Carbon distribution (%) in different chemical shift regions (ppm) in 13C-CPMAS-NMR spectra of lignins from 1 Chamaecytisus and wheat.
| Range (ppm) | Wheat | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–40 (alkyl groups) | 15.2 | 22.7 |
| 40–110 ( | 54.1 | 49.2 |
| 110–160 (aromatics and phenolics) | 27.0 | 23.8 |
| 160–200 (carbonyl and carboxyl groups) | 3.4 | 4.3 |
| 2 HB | 42.2 | 46.5 |
| 3 HI | 57.5 | 53.6 |
| HB/HI | 0.73 | 0.87 |
| Alkyl-related 4 hydrophobicity index | 0.36 | 0.49 |
1 Since the 13C-CPMAS spectra of lignins isolated from Chamaecytisus, Leucaena and barley were not significantly different (Figure S1), the integration refers to the spectrum from Chamaecytisus; 2 Sum of integration of signals between 0–40 and 110–160 ppm; 3 Sum of integration of signal between 40–110 and 160–200 ppm; 4 Integration of signals between 0–40 divided by the sum of the area of signals between 0–40 and 110–160 ppm.
Assignment of main 13C-1H correlation signals in HSQC spectra of lignin from wheat and Chamaecytisus a shown in Figure 6.
| Label | δC | δH | Assignment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bβ | 53.4 | 3.1 | Cβ-Hβ in resinol substructures (B) |
| OMe | 55.5 | 3.7 | C-H in methoxy groups |
| Aγ | 59.3 | 3.2 and 3.9 | Cγ-Hγ in β- |
| A′γ | 62.9 | 3.9 | Cγ-Hγ in γ-acylated β- |
| X5 | 63.0 | 3.2 | C5-H5 in β-xylopyranoside |
| Aα (G) | 69.4 | 4.5 | Cα-Hα in β- |
| Bγ | 70.6 | 3.3 and 3.9 | Cγ-Hγ in resinol substructures (B) |
| Cγ | 70.9 | 4.2 | Cγ-Hγ in β-5′ phenylcoumaran subunit (C) c |
| A′α (G) | 71.1 | 4.8 | Cα-Hα in γ-acylated β- |
| X′2 | 72.4 | 4.9 | C2-H2 in 2- |
| X2 | 72.5 | 3.0 | C2-H2 in β-xylopyranoside |
| X3 | 73.8 | 3.3 | C3-H3 in β-xylopyranoside |
| X4 | 75.3 | 3.5 | C4-H4 in β-xylopyranoside |
| U4 | 81.6 | 3.1 | C4-H4 in 4- |
| B | 85.1 | 4.6 | Cα-Hα in resinol (β-β) substructures (B) |
| Aβ (S) | 85.9 | 4.1 | Cβ−Hβ in β- |
| S2,6 | 103.9 | 6.7 | C2,6-H2,6 in etherified syringyl units (S) |
| S′2,6 | 106.8 | 7.2 | C2,6-H2,6 in oxidized (Cα=O) phenolic syringyl units (S′) |
| FA2 | 110.6 | 7.4 | C2-H2 in ferulate (FA) c |
| G2 | 111.7 | 6.6 | C2-H2 in guaiacyl units (G) |
| J2(G) | 112.1 | 7.4 | C2-H2 in cinnamyl aldehyde end-groups (J) c |
| H3,5 | 115.1 | 6.7 | C3,5-H3,5 in |
| G5 | 115.6 | 6.7 | C5-H5 in guaiacyl units (G) |
| PCA3,5 | 117.1 | 6.4 | C3,5-H3,5 in |
| G6 | 119.8 | 6.8 | C6-H6 in guaiacyl units (G) c |
| J6(G) | 122.7 | 7.1 | C6-H6 in cinnamyl aldehyde end-groups (J) c |
| FA6 | 122.9 | 7.1 | C6-H6 in ferulate (FA) c |
| H2,6 | 129.0 | 7.2 | C2,6-H2,6 in |
| PCA2,6 | 130.3 | 7.5 | C2,6-H2,6 in |
| PCAα and FAα | 144.5 | 7.5 | Cα-Hα in |
| Anomeric Region | |||
| αX1 (R) | 4.9 | 92.2 | α- |
| U1 | 5.1 | 97.2 | 4- |
| βX1 (R) | 4.2 | 97.3 | β- |
| UGA1 | 4.9 | 101.7 | Methyl(1/4)-α- |
| M1 | 4.5 | 101.0 | (1/4)- |
| X1-X′1 | 4.3 | 101.5 | β- |
a Since the 13C-1H HSQC spectra of lignins isolated from Chamaecytisus, Leucaena and barley lignins were not significantly different (Figure S2), the interpretation refers to HSQC spectrum from Chamaecytisus; b Not present in Wheat-derived lignin; c Not present in Chamaecytisus-derived lignin.