Literature DB >> 28165290

Improved fat-suppression homogeneity with mDIXON turbo spin echo (TSE) in pediatric spine imaging at 3.0 T.

Amber L Pokorney1, Jonathan M Chia2, Cory M Pfeifer1, Jeffrey H Miller1, Houchun H Hu1.   

Abstract

Background Robust fat suppression remains essential in clinical MRI to improve tissue signal contrast, minimize fat-related artifacts, and enhance image quality. Purpose To compare fat suppression between mDIXON turbo spin echo (TSE) and conventional frequency-selective and inversion-recovery methods in pediatric spine MRI. Material and Methods Images from T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) TSE sequences coupled with conventional methods and the mDIXON technique were compared in 36 patients (5.8 ± 5.4 years) at 3.0 T. Images from 42 pairs of T1W (n = 16) and T2W (n = 26) scans were acquired. Two radiologists reviewed the data and rated images using a three-point scale in two categories, including the uniformity of fat suppression and overall diagnostic image quality. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the scores. Results The Cohen's kappa coefficient for inter-rater agreement was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.83). Images from mDIXON TSE were considered superior in fat suppression ( P < 0.01) in 22 (rater 1) and 25 (rater 2) cases, respectively. In 13 (rater 1) and 11 (rater 2) cases, mDIXON TSE demonstrated improved diagnostic image quality ( P < 0.01). In three cases, fat suppression was superior using inversion-recovery and likewise in one case mDIXON had poorer image diagnostic quality. Lastly, mDIXON and conventional fat-suppression methods performed similarly in 17 (rater 1) and 14 (rater 2) cases, and yielded equal diagnostic image quality in 28 (rater 1) and 30 (rater 2) cases. Conclusion Robust fat suppression can be achieved with mDixon TSE pediatric spine imaging at 3.0 T and should be considered as a permanent replacement of traditional methods, in particular frequency-selective techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Turbo spin echo (TSE); chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); fat suppression; pediatrics; spine; water–fat separation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28165290     DOI: 10.1177/0284185117690424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  6 in total

Review 1.  State-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging sequences for pediatric body imaging.

Authors:  Mareen Sarah Kraus; Ailish C Coblentz; Vibhas S Deshpande; Johannes M Peeters; Pedro M Itriago-Leon; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-10-18

2.  Detection of vertebral metastases: a comparison between the modified Dixon turbo spin echo T2 weighted MRI and conventional T1 weighted MRI: a preliminary study in a tertiary centre.

Authors:  Seok Hahn; Young Han Lee; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison of lumbar degenerative disc disease using conventional fast spin echo T2W MRI and T2 fast spin echo dixon sequences.

Authors:  Asif Saifuddin; Ramanan Rajakulasingam; Rodney Santiago; Mateen Siddiqui; Michael Khoo; Ian Pressney
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Evaluating Compressed SENSE (CS) MRI Metal Artifact Reduction Using Pig L-Spine Phantom and Transplant Patients: Focused on the CS-SEMAC (SPIR), mDixon(O-MAR) and STIR Techniques.

Authors:  Eun-Hoe Goo; Sung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-09-15

Review 5.  REACT - A novel flow-independent non-gated non-contrast MR angiography technique using magnetization-prepared 3D non-balanced dual-echo dixon method: Preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  Eu Jin Tan; Shuo Zhang; Prasanna Tirukonda; Le Roy Chong
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-06-07

6.  Robustness of a Combined Modified Dixon and PROPELLER Sequence with Two Interleaved Echoes in Clinical Head and Neck MRI.

Authors:  Yutaka Shigenaga; Daisuke Takenaka; Tomohisa Hashimoto; Takayuki Ishida
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.471

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.