Literature DB >> 28165257

The development and initial validation of the Decent Work Scale.

Ryan D Duffy1, Blake A Allan2, Jessica W England1, David L Blustein3, Kelsey L Autin1, Richard P Douglass1, Joaquim Ferreira4, Eduardo J R Santos.   

Abstract

Decent work is positioned as the centerpiece of the recently developed Psychology of Working Theory (PWT; Duffy, Blustein, Diemer, & Autin, 2016). However, to date, no instrument exists which assesses all 5 components of decent work from a psychological perspective. In the current study, we developed the Decent Work Scale (DWS) and demonstrated several aspects of validity with 2 samples of working adults. In Study 1 (N = 275), a large pool of items were developed and exploratory factor analysis was conducted resulting in a final 15-item scale with 5 factors/subscales corresponding to the 5 components of decent work: (a) physically and interpersonally safe working conditions, (b) access to health care, (c) adequate compensation, (d) hours that allow for free time and rest, and (e) organizational values that complement family and social values. In Study 2 (N = 589), confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that a 5-factor, bifactor model offered the strongest and most parsimonious fit to the data. Configural, metric, and scalar invariance models were tested demonstrating that the structure of the instrument did not differ across gender, income, social class, and majority/minority racial/ethnic groups. Finally, the overall scale score and 5 subscale scores correlated in the expected directions with similar constructs supporting convergent and discriminant evidence of validity, and subscale scores evidenced predictive validity in the prediction of job satisfaction, work meaning, and withdrawal intentions. The development of this scale provides a useful tool for researchers and practitioners seeking to assess the attainment of decent work among employed adults. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28165257     DOI: 10.1037/cou0000191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Couns Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0167


  10 in total

1.  Linking Decent Work and Well-Being Among Chinese Millennial Employees: A Psychology of Working Perspective.

Authors:  Wei Wan; Tingting Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  The intersections of migration, app-based gig work, and career development: implications for career practice and research.

Authors:  Peyman Abkhezr; Mary McMahon
Journal:  Int J Educ Vocat Guid       Date:  2022-06-21

3.  Stronger Together: Examining the Interaction Effects of Workplace Dignity and Workplace Inclusion on Employees' Job Performance.

Authors:  Ammarah Ahmed; Dapeng Liang; Muhammad Adeel Anjum; Dilawar Khan Durrani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Examining Predictors and Outcomes of Decent Work among Korean Workers.

Authors:  Minsun Kim; Jaehoon Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Professional and psychological precursors of instructional approaches used in distance learning during COVID-19.

Authors:  Dorit Alt
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-07-07

6.  Validating the decent work scale incorporated with a social recognition component among young adult social workers.

Authors:  Xuebing Su; Victor Wong; Kun Liang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-28

7.  Satisfaction with life in workers: A chained mediation model investigating the roles of resilience, career adaptability, self-efficacy, and years of education.

Authors:  Eleonora Topino; Andrea Svicher; Annamaria Di Fabio; Alessio Gori
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-23

8.  Occupational Safety and Health Staging Framework for Decent Work.

Authors:  Paul A Schulte; Ivo Iavicoli; Luca Fontana; Stavroula Leka; Maureen F Dollard; Acran Salmen-Navarro; Fernanda J Salles; Kelly P K Olympio; Roberto Lucchini; Marilyn Fingerhut; Francesco S Violante; Mahinda Seneviratne; Jodi Oakman; Olivier Lo; Camila H Alfredo; Marcia Bandini; João S Silva-Junior; Maria C Martinez; Teresa Cotrim; Folashade Omokhodion; Frida M Fischer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  A Validation Study of the Work Need Satisfaction Scale for Korean Working Adults.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Kim; Kieun Yoo; Seran Lee; Ki-Hak Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-24

10.  Examining Predictors and Outcomes of Decent Work Perception with Chinese Nursing College Students.

Authors:  Yin Ma; Junjer You; Yuanxiong Tang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.