Literature DB >> 28165176

Cardiotocographic parameters in small-for-gestational-age fetuses: How do they vary from normal at different gestational ages? A study of 11687 fetuses from 25 to 40 weeks of pregnancy.

Célia Amorim-Costa1,2,3, Diogo Ayres de Campos1,2,3,4, João Bernardes1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess how cardiotocographic (CTG) parameters differ between small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and normal fetuses at different gestational ages.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study using the first antepartum tracing of singleton pregnancies with no malformations. Fetuses with birthweight ≥10th percentile for gestational age and other normal pregnancy outcome criteria (term birth, normal umbilical artery pH and Apgar scores, no intensive care unit admission) were compared with fetuses with birthweight <10th and <3rd percentiles for gestational age (SGA < p10 and SGA < p3, a subgroup of the latter). Each CTG parameter was compared, by gestational age, using both statistical tests and percentile curves derived from normal outcome cases. Tracings were analyzed with the OmniviewSisPorto® 3.7 system.
RESULTS: A total of 11 687 tracings (from the same number of fetuses) were analyzed: 9701 normal, 1986 SGA < p10, and 543 SGA < p3. SGA fetuses had lower long- and short-term variability, and number of accelerations, with more pronounced differences between around 28 and 35 weeks. In contrast, baseline was lower in SGA fetuses from 34 weeks onwards. All differences were more pronounced for SGA < p3 fetuses. Similar trends throughout gestation occurred in all groups: decrease in baseline, and increase in long- and short-term variability, and accelerations.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents an important step for accurate CTG interpretation in SGA fetuses and, consequently, management of fetal growth restriction (FGR), as it contributes to differentiate between maturational CTG changes that occur physiologically throughout pregnancy, and possible signs of fetal compromise in FGR.
© 2017 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antepartum; cardiotocography; fetal heart rate; gestational age; growth restriction; small for gestational age

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28165176     DOI: 10.1111/jog.13235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  4 in total

1.  Heart rate variability categories of fluctuation amplitude and complexity: diagnostic markers of fetal development and its disturbances.

Authors:  Dirk Hoyer; Alexander Schmidt; Kathleen M Gustafson; Silvia M Lobmaier; Igor Lakhno; Peter van Leeuwen; Dirk Cysarz; Hubert Preisl; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Comparison of diurnal variations, gestational age and gender related differences in fetal heart rate (FHR) parameters between appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses in the home environment.

Authors:  Habiba Kapaya; Richard Jacques; Dilly Anumba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Complexity of Cardiotocographic Signals as A Predictor of Labor.

Authors:  João Monteiro-Santos; Teresa Henriques; Inês Nunes; Célia Amorim-Costa; João Bernardes; Cristina Costa-Santos
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.524

Review 4.  Fetal growth restriction and stillbirth: Biomarkers for identifying at risk fetuses.

Authors:  Victoria J King; Laura Bennet; Peter R Stone; Alys Clark; Alistair J Gunn; Simerdeep K Dhillon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.