Literature DB >> 2816507

Colles' fracture and bone density of the ultradistal radius.

R Eastell1, B L Riggs, H W Wahner, W M O'Fallon, P C Amadio, L J Melton.   

Abstract

To determine whether Colles' fracture, generally considered a manifestation of postmenopausal osteoporosis, is associated with a decrease in bone density at the site of fracture, we measured bone mineral density of the ultradistal radius (UDR-BMD) by single-photon absorptiometry with computer-assisted image processing. In 119 normal women (ages 22-92 years), UDR-BMD decreased by 17% between ages 30 and 75 years. From UDR-BMD measurements in these normal women and in 40 women (ages 53-80 years) with Colles' fracture alone, a population-based analysis was made to estimate fracture risk at different values of UDR-BMD. Colles' fracture was uncommon at UDR-BMD greater than 0.40 g/cm2 (the "fracture threshold"). As bone density decreased below this level, fractures became more frequent (a "gradient of risk").

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2816507     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650040419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  12 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporosis: clinical features, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  L A Fleming
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Ultrasound velocity changes at the proximal phalanxes of the hand in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  V Ventura; M Mauloni; M Mura; F Paltrinieri; D de Aloysio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Cortical and trabecular bone at the radius and tibia in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: a Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) study.

Authors:  K A Szabo; C E Webber; J D Adachi; R Tozer; C Gordon; A Papaioannou
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Clinical usefulness of risk factors for osteoporosis.

Authors:  S A Earnshaw; D J Hosking
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Defining osteoporosis.

Authors:  L J Melton; H W Wahner
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Geometric variables from DXA of the radius predict forearm fracture load in vitro.

Authors:  E R Myers; A T Hecker; D S Rooks; J A Hipp; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  Overview of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-01

Review 8.  When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Age-related differences in cross-sectional geometry of the forearm bones in healthy women.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; K H Myburgh; M C van der Meulen; E Lindenberger; R Marcus
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Is pelvic bone mineral content assessed through dual energy X-ray absorptiometry an appropriate anatomical area for bone mass estimation in women?

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; E R Hernández; L F Villa; M Alvarez del Buergo
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.