Eva Jangland1,2, Lena Gunningberg3,4. 1. Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. 2. Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. 3. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. 4. Quality Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate an implementation project on patient participation. BACKGROUND: Patient participation is one of the cornerstones of person-centred care. A previous intervention study resulted in improved patient participation in a surgical department in a large university hospital in Sweden. A subsequent implementation project was guided by the PARiSH framework and included several strategies over 2 years. METHOD: Patients (n = 198) in five units completed a questionnaire and nurse managers (n = 5) were interviewed. RESULTS: Although the long-term implementation project did not improve patient participation in the units, the nurse managers described a changing culture in which staff grew to accept patients' involvement in their own care. Several barriers to change and sustainability were acknowledged. CONCLUSIONS: Improving patient participation in a busy environment is challenging. The framework was useful in the different steps of the project. In the future, the interrelationship of the core elements needs to be analysed in an ongoing and deeper way to allow both prediction and prevention of barriers to improvement. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: A dedicated leadership together with skilled facilitators should encourage and support staff to reflect on their attitudes and ways of working to increase person-centred care.
AIM: To evaluate an implementation project on patient participation. BACKGROUND:Patient participation is one of the cornerstones of person-centred care. A previous intervention study resulted in improved patient participation in a surgical department in a large university hospital in Sweden. A subsequent implementation project was guided by the PARiSH framework and included several strategies over 2 years. METHOD:Patients (n = 198) in five units completed a questionnaire and nurse managers (n = 5) were interviewed. RESULTS: Although the long-term implementation project did not improve patient participation in the units, the nurse managers described a changing culture in which staff grew to accept patients' involvement in their own care. Several barriers to change and sustainability were acknowledged. CONCLUSIONS: Improving patient participation in a busy environment is challenging. The framework was useful in the different steps of the project. In the future, the interrelationship of the core elements needs to be analysed in an ongoing and deeper way to allow both prediction and prevention of barriers to improvement. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: A dedicated leadership together with skilled facilitators should encourage and support staff to reflect on their attitudes and ways of working to increase person-centred care.
Authors: Sanetta Henrietta Johanna du Toit; Loretta Baldassar; Christine L Raber; Adele M Millard; Christopher D Etherton-Beer; Helen A Buchanan; Daniel S du Toit; Lesley J Collier; Gary Cheung; Kathryn Peri; Eileen A Webb; Meryl Lovarini Journal: J Cross Cult Gerontol Date: 2020-03
Authors: Julie Cowie; Avril Nicoll; Elena D Dimova; Pauline Campbell; Edward A Duncan Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-06-28 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Natalie Kružliaková; Kathleen Porter; Pamela A Ray; Valisa Hedrick; Donna Jean Brock; Jamie Zoellner Journal: Health Lit Res Pract Date: 2021-02-11
Authors: Maya Kylén; Ulla-Karin Schön; Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen; Marie Elf Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 3.390