BACKGROUND: Zika virus (ZIKV) has spread in the Americas, including parts of the southern United States, and infection can be associated with serious complications, including congenital brain abnormalities. Probable transfusion transmission of ZIKV has been documented in Brazil. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Preemptive testing of blood donations for ZIKV RNA was implemented in southern US states at risk of local transmission using a test approved under a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational new drug application, cobas Zika. Screening was expanded after issuance of an updated FDA guidance. Donations reactive on initial screening were further tested by nucleic acid and antibody tests to determine the donor status. RESULTS: Of 358,786 donations from US states screened by individual donation testing, 23 were initially reactive on cobas Zika. Fourteen of these represented probable ZIKV infection based on reactivity on additional nucleic acid testing or anti-Zika immunoglobulin M. Ten of the 14 donors reported travel to an identified ZIKV-active area within 90 days before donation (median time from end of travel to donation, 25 days; range, 6-71 days). Three donors with travel history also had a potential sexual exposure. Only seven of the 14 donations with probable ZIKV infection were detectable upon 1:6 dilution to simulate minipool testing. The estimated specificity of the cobas Zika test was 99.997%. CONCLUSION: Screening of donations for ZIKV RNA can interdict ZIKV-infected donors. Donor risk factors include travel more than 4 weeks before donation and sexual exposure. Minipool screening would have detected only 50% of the RNA-positive donations.
BACKGROUND:Zika virus (ZIKV) has spread in the Americas, including parts of the southern United States, and infection can be associated with serious complications, including congenital brain abnormalities. Probable transfusion transmission of ZIKV has been documented in Brazil. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Preemptive testing of blood donations for ZIKV RNA was implemented in southern US states at risk of local transmission using a test approved under a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational new drug application, cobas Zika. Screening was expanded after issuance of an updated FDA guidance. Donations reactive on initial screening were further tested by nucleic acid and antibody tests to determine the donor status. RESULTS: Of 358,786 donations from US states screened by individual donation testing, 23 were initially reactive on cobas Zika. Fourteen of these represented probable ZIKVinfection based on reactivity on additional nucleic acid testing or anti-Zika immunoglobulin M. Ten of the 14 donors reported travel to an identified ZIKV-active area within 90 days before donation (median time from end of travel to donation, 25 days; range, 6-71 days). Three donors with travel history also had a potential sexual exposure. Only seven of the 14 donations with probable ZIKVinfection were detectable upon 1:6 dilution to simulate minipool testing. The estimated specificity of the cobas Zika test was 99.997%. CONCLUSION: Screening of donations for ZIKV RNA can interdict ZIKV-infected donors. Donor risk factors include travel more than 4 weeks before donation and sexual exposure. Minipool screening would have detected only 50% of the RNA-positive donations.
Authors: Matthew T Aliota; Leda Bassit; Shelton S Bradrick; Bryan Cox; Mariano A Garcia-Blanco; Christina Gavegnano; Thomas C Friedrich; Thaddeus G Golos; Diane E Griffin; Andrew D Haddow; Esper G Kallas; Uriel Kitron; Marc Lecuit; Diogo M Magnani; Caroline Marrs; Natalia Mercer; Edward McSweegan; Lisa F P Ng; David H O'Connor; Jorge E Osorio; Guilherme S Ribeiro; Michael Ricciardi; Shannan L Rossi; George Saade; Raymond F Schinazi; Geraldine O Schott-Lerner; Chao Shan; Pei-Yong Shi; David I Watkins; Nikos Vasilakis; Scott C Weaver Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Christopher J Gregory; Titilope Oduyebo; Aaron C Brault; John T Brooks; Koo-Whang Chung; Susan Hills; Matthew J Kuehnert; Paul Mead; Dana Meaney-Delman; Ingrid Rabe; Erin Staples; Lyle R Petersen Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2017-12-16 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Ángel Giménez-Richarte; Mabel Ortiz de Salazar; Cristina Arbona; María P Giménez-Richarte; Miriam Collado; Pedro L Fernández; Francisco Quiles; Carlos Clavijo; Pascual Marco; Jose-Manuel Ramos-Rincon Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 5.752
Authors: Paulo Alex Neves da Silva; Célia Regina Malveste Ito; Mônica Santiago Barbosa; Mônica de Oliveira Santos; Lilian Carla Carneiro Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Wen-Yang Tsai; Han Ha Youn; Carlos Brites; Jih-Jin Tsai; Jasmine Tyson; Celia Pedroso; Jan Felix Drexler; Mars Stone; Graham Simmons; Michael P Busch; Marion Lanteri; Susan L Stramer; Angel Balmaseda; Eva Harris; Wei-Kung Wang Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 9.079