Literature DB >> 28164307

How to quantify microparticles in RBCs? A validated flow cytometry method allows the detection of an increase in microparticles during storage.

Clémentine Gamonet1, Guillaume Mourey1,2, Sophie Aupet1, Sabéha Biichle1, Régis Petitjean1, Chrystelle Vidal3, Aurore Pugin3, Christian Naegelen4, Pierre Tiberghien1,4, Pascal Morel4, Fanny Angelot-Delettre1, Estelle Seilles1,2, Philippe Saas1, Laurent Bardiaux4, Francine Garnache-Ottou1,2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The procoagulant and proinflammatory microparticles (MPs) released during storage of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) can potentially modify transfusion benefits. A robust method to quantify MPs in pRBCs is needed to evaluate their impact in clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The objective was to validate the preanalytic conditions required to prepare pRBC supernatant as well as a method to quantify and evaluate MP variations over 42 days of pRBC storage.A flow cytometry method with size-calibrated beads was developed and fully validated. Quantification of MPs in pRBCs (n = 109) was assessed during short-term (7 days) and long-term (42 days) storage at 4°C, during short-term storage (8 hours) at room temperature, and after 2 years frozen.
RESULTS: Repeatability, reproducibility, and linearity of the quantification method were validated, and variations during conservation are presented. There was high variability in RBC (erythrocyte) MP (ERMP) and platelet MP (PMP) levels between RBC units, depending on the filter used for leukocyte reduction. During the 42 days of storage at 4°C, significant increases in ERMPs and PMPs occurred (from 58 to 138 ERMPs/µL from Day 2 to Day 42; p = 0.0002; and from 326 to 771 PMPs/µL from Day 2 to Day 42; p = 0.00026).
CONCLUSION: We use a robust method to confirm that ERMPs and PMPs are present to various degrees in pRBCs and that storage for 42 days significantly increases their generation. This method is robust enough to allow MP quantification in pRBCs and is adapted to evaluate the clinical impact of transfused MPs in prospective clinical trials.
© 2017 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28164307     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  4 in total

1.  Protective effect of fungal extracellular vesicles against murine candidiasis.

Authors:  Gabriele Vargas; Leandro Honorato; Allan Jefferson Guimarães; Marcio L Rodrigues; Flavia C G Reis; André M Vale; Anjana Ray; Joshua Daniel Nosanchuk; Leonardo Nimrichter
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.715

2.  Processing methods and storage duration impact extracellular vesicle counts in red blood cell units.

Authors:  Clementine Gamonet; Maxime Desmarets; Guillaume Mourey; Sabeha Biichle; Sophie Aupet; Caroline Laheurte; Anne François; Eric Resch; Frédéric Bigey; Delphine Binda; Laurent Bardiaux; Christian Naegelen; Nadine Marpaux; Fanny Angelot Delettre; Philippe Saas; Pascal Morel; Pierre Tiberghien; Jacques Lacroix; Gilles Capellier; Chrystelle Vidal; Francine Garnache-Ottou
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-10

3.  The potential effect of leukocyte filtration methods on erythrocyte-derived microvesicles: One step forward.

Authors:  Fateme Roshanzamir; Sedigheh Amini-Kafiabad; Mahin Nikougoftar Zarif; Ali Arabkhazaeli; Mahshid Mohammadipour
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2022-08-01

Review 4.  Clinical requirements for extracellular vesicle assays.

Authors:  Lisa Ayers; Ryan Pink; David Raul Francisco Carter; Rienk Nieuwland
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2019-03-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.