Literature DB >> 28164175

PEPCOR - A Risk Prediction Model for Pediatric Intensive Care Units Utilizing Ventilator Days and Length of Stay.

Theruni Pethiyagoda1, Nikhil Chanani2, Chihwen Cheng3, May D Wang4.   

Abstract

Great sources of concern for pediatric and neonatal intensive care units are the total resource utilization and cost of caring for very sick children. This paper attempts to create a usable clinical decision support system (PEPCOR) that would help improve personalized health care and avoid unnecessary secondary, and costly, procedures that do not improve the care of a critically ill patient. The system uses the Children's Healthcare of Atlanta ICU database to analyze the effects on the risk, (quantified as the risk of invasive ventilation and associated complications) when combining two procedures versus administering one procedure without the other. The risk is calculated by computing the ratio of ventilator days to the length of stay, with a higher risk score indicating the second procedure did not improve the overall health of the patient. 82/90 of the procedure combinations showed a statistically significant difference with a p-value < 0.05 when the stand-alone procedure was compared to the combination of two procedures.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28164175      PMCID: PMC5287707          DOI: 10.1109/BHI.2016.7455841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2641-3590


  8 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing length of stay in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  David A Gruenberg; Wayne Shelton; Susannah L Rose; Ann E Rutter; Sophia Socaris; Glenn McGee
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): do we need another paediatric mortality prediction score?

Authors:  A G Randolph
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care.

Authors:  F Shann; G Pearson; A Slater; K Wilkinson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Scoring systems in pediatric intensive care: PRISM III versus PIM.

Authors:  Reinoud J Gemke; JohannesA van Vught
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-01-12       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  PRISM III: an updated Pediatric Risk of Mortality score.

Authors:  M M Pollack; K M Patel; U E Ruttimann
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Daily cost of an intensive care unit day: the contribution of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Joseph F Dasta; Trent P McLaughlin; Samir H Mody; Catherine Tak Piech
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Trends in length of stay and short-term outcomes among Medicare patients hospitalized for heart failure, 1993-2006.

Authors:  Héctor Bueno; Joseph S Ross; Yun Wang; Jersey Chen; María T Vidán; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Jeptha P Curtis; Elizabeth E Drye; Judith H Lichtman; Patricia S Keenan; Mikhail Kosiborod; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The suitability of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), PIM2, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), and PRISM III for monitoring the quality of pediatric intensive care in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Anthony Slater; Frank Shann
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.624

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.