| Literature DB >> 28163657 |
Naoya Nakashima1, Daisuke Sueta1, Yusuke Kanemaru1, Seiji Takashio1, Eiichiro Yamamoto1, Shinsuke Hanatani1, Hisanori Kanazawa1, Yasuhiro Izumiya1, Sunao Kojima1, Koichi Kaikita1, Seiji Hokimoto1, Kenichi Tsujita1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although vein stenting is popular for treatment for venous thromboembolism due to mechanical compression, some cases are forced to avoid inserting align agents because of immunodeficiency. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Direct oral anti-coagulant; Iliac vein compression syndrome; Thromboembolism
Year: 2017 PMID: 28163657 PMCID: PMC5286566 DOI: 10.1186/s12959-017-0128-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thromb J ISSN: 1477-9560
Fig. 1Contrast-enhanced computed tomography on the first visit. A contrast deficit in (a) the inferior vena cava at the level of kidney lower lobe (the yellow arrow), (b) the left external iliac vein (the yellow arrow), (c) the left superficial femoral vein (the yellow arrow), (d) the left popliteal vein (the yellow arrow)
Fig. 2Magnetic resonance venography (T2-TRA) on the first visit. rt. CIA; right common iliac artery, lt. CIA; left common iliac artery, lt. CIV; left common iliac vein, *: vertebral body at fifth lumbar vertebra
Fig. 3Contrast-enhanced computed tomography at 7 days after the initiation of anticoagulation therapy. The yellow arrow indicates reduced thrombosis
Fig. 4Contrast-enhanced computed tomography at 3 months after the initiation of anticoagulation therapy. The thrombosis was disappeared completely