| Literature DB >> 28163599 |
Navinder Saini1, Naveen Singh1, Anil Kumar1, Nitika Vihan1, Sangita Yadav2, Sujata Vasudev1, D K Yadava1.
Abstract
Low erucic acid is a major breeding target to improve the edible oil quality in Brassica juncea. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in fatty acid elongase 1 (FAE1.1 and FAE1.2) gene was exploited to expedite the breeding program. The paralogs of FAE1 gene were sequenced from low erucic acid genotype Pusa Mustard 30 and SNPs were identified through homologous alignment with sequence downloaded from NCBI GenBank. Two SNPs in FAE1.1 at position 591 and 1265 and one in FAE1.2 at 237 were found polymorphic among low and high erucic acid genotypes. These SNPs either create or change the recognition site of restriction enzymes. Transition of a single nucleotide at position 591 and 1265 in FAE1.1, and at position 237 in FAE1.2, leads to a change in the recognition site of Hpy99I, BglII and MnlI restriction enzymes, respectively. Two CAPS markers for FAE1.1 and one for FAE1.2 were developed to differentiate low and high erucic acid genotypes. The efficiency of these CAPS markers was found 100 per cent when validated in Brassica juncea, and B. nigra genotypes and used in back-cross breeding. These CAPS markers will facilitate in marker-assisted selection for improvement of oil quality in Brassica juncea.Entities:
Keywords: Brassica juncea; CAPS; FAE1; SNP; erucic acid
Year: 2016 PMID: 28163599 PMCID: PMC5282766 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.16132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Genotyping for FAE1.1 and FAE1.2 genes and erucic acid content in different genotypes
| Species | Genotype | Erucic acid content (%) | Genotype | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| PM24 | 0.25 | e1e1 | e2 e2 | |
| PM30 | 0.21 | e1e1 | e2 e2 | |
| PDZ-1 | 0.13 | e1e1 | e2 e2 | |
| RCL-1 | 0.25 | e1e1 | e2 e2 | |
| RCL-2 | 0.31 | e1e1 | e2 e2 | |
| RCL-3 | 0.24 | e1e1 | e2 e2 | |
| Pusa Vijay | 39.12 | E1E1 | E2 E2 | |
| Pusa Bold | 43.1 | E1E1 | E2 E2 | |
| NRCDR-02 | 38.26 | E1E1 | E2 E2 | |
| DRMRIJ 31 | 35.15 | E1E1 | E2 E2 | |
| Laxmi | 42.5 | E1E1 | E2 E2 | |
| RH0749 | 39.74 | E1E1 | E2 E2 | |
| LS-1 | 27.42 | E1E1 | e2 e2 | |
| BioYSR | 22.93 | E1E1 | E2 E2 | |
| Heera | 0.13 | e1e1 | e2 e2 | |
|
| ||||
| EC 597325 | 0.20 | e1e1 | e2 e2 | |
| Donskaja | 14.7 | e1e1 | E2 E2 | |
| BEC144 | 23.79 | e1e1 | E2 E2 | |
|
| ||||
| NG1 | 24.3 | – | E2E2 | |
| NG2 | 32.02 | – | E2E2 | |
| NG3 | 30.55 | – | E2E2 | |
Details of the primers and restriction enzymes used in CAPS marker development
| Gene | Primer name | Primer sequence | Restriction enzyme | Amplicon size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPS591 | F-TCGTGGCTTGACTTCTTGAG | 432 | ||
| CAPS1265 | F-ACGTTAGGTCCGTTGATTCTTC | 427 | ||
| CAPS237 | F-TAACCATCGCTCCACTCTTTG | 219 |
Genotyping and phenotyping of BC1F1 populations for erucic acid trait
| BC1F1 population of cross | Total plants | Erucic acid content (%) | χ2 value | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| <2.0% | 2–14% | 15–31% | ||||
| PM24 × P. Vijay | 136 | 31 | 78 | 27 | 3.176 | 0.2043 |
| PM 30 × P. Bold | 122 | 29 | 69 | 24 | 2.508 | 0.2853 |
| Genotype | e1e1e2e2 | E1e1e2e2/e1e1E2e2 | E1e1E2e2 | |||
Fig. 1Detection of SNP591 (A) and SNP 1265 (B) of FAE1.1 and SNP237 (C) of FAE1.2 using CAPS markers in genotypes PM24 (1), BEC144 (2), Heera (3), PM30 (4), BioYSR (5), EC 597325 (6), PDZ-1 (7), RCL-1 (8), RCL-2 (9), RCL-3 (10), NRCDR-02 (11), DRMRIJ 31 (12), Donskaja (13), LS-1 (14) and RH0749 (15).
Fig. 2Amplification patterns of newly developed CAPS markers in BC1F1 individuals derived from the cross between Pusa Mustard 30 (P1; low erucic acid, e1e1e2e2) and Pusa Bold (P2; high in erucic acid, E1E1E2E2). A: Plants 3, 7, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 23, and 25 have the dominant allele of FAE1.1 (E1) as shown by the restriction pattern with the CAPS marker CAPS591. B: The digestion pattern with CAPS1265 revealed the presence of recessive allele (e1) in all individuals. C: The restriction pattern with the dominant marker CAPS237 for gene FAE1.2 demonstrated that the individuals were either recessive homozygous (e2e2) or heterozygous (E2e2).