Ezra Golberstein1, Sarah Kolvenbach2, Hilary Carruthers3, Benjamin Druss4, Paul Goering3. 1. Division of Health Policy & Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 729, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: egolber@umn.edu. 2. School of Psychology, University of Surrey, United Kingdom. 3. Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, United States. 4. Department of Health Policy & Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary care is the main point-of-entry for identifying and treating mental health problems. This research examines the effect of a new model of supporting primary care providers (PCPs) treating mental health disorders, the electronic consultation (eConsults), a standard process for communication between PCPs and psychiatrists through an electronic health records system. METHODS: A cluster-randomized evaluation of the psychiatric eConsults model, as implemented in a large integrated delivery system. Web survey data before and after the implementation of psychiatric eConsults were collected on PCPs' perceptions of their capability and skill to deliver mental health services, and analyzed with linear regression models. RESULTS: At baseline PCPs had mixed assessments of perceived support for delivering mental health services and of the availability of specialist consultations, but had relatively high perceived self-efficacy and skill for identifying, diagnosing and treating depression. PCPs in the Treatment group had statistically significant 18%, 13%, and 16% improvements in perceived support for diagnosing mental health problems, making treatment decisions, and changing treatment regimens, respectively; and 24% improved perceived ease of access to consultations for mental health, compared to the Control group. Evidence of effects on self-efficacy and perceived skill around depression was more limited. CONCLUSIONS: The psychiatric eConsults model improved PCPs' perceptions of support for delivering mental health care and perceptions of access to specialist consultations. IMPLICATIONS: Electronic consultations may be a promising approach to support the delivery of mental health services in primary care settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Pre- and post-intervention web surveys from a cluster-randomized trial.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Primary care is the main point-of-entry for identifying and treating mental health problems. This research examines the effect of a new model of supporting primary care providers (PCPs) treating mental health disorders, the electronic consultation (eConsults), a standard process for communication between PCPs and psychiatrists through an electronic health records system. METHODS: A cluster-randomized evaluation of the psychiatric eConsults model, as implemented in a large integrated delivery system. Web survey data before and after the implementation of psychiatric eConsults were collected on PCPs' perceptions of their capability and skill to deliver mental health services, and analyzed with linear regression models. RESULTS: At baseline PCPs had mixed assessments of perceived support for delivering mental health services and of the availability of specialist consultations, but had relatively high perceived self-efficacy and skill for identifying, diagnosing and treating depression. PCPs in the Treatment group had statistically significant 18%, 13%, and 16% improvements in perceived support for diagnosing mental health problems, making treatment decisions, and changing treatment regimens, respectively; and 24% improved perceived ease of access to consultations for mental health, compared to the Control group. Evidence of effects on self-efficacy and perceived skill around depression was more limited. CONCLUSIONS: The psychiatric eConsults model improved PCPs' perceptions of support for delivering mental health care and perceptions of access to specialist consultations. IMPLICATIONS: Electronic consultations may be a promising approach to support the delivery of mental health services in primary care settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Pre- and post-intervention web surveys from a cluster-randomized trial.
Authors: Ezra Golberstein; Jennifer M Joseph; Benjamin G Druss; Hilary Carruthers; Paul Goering Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Varsha G Vimalananda; Jay D Orlander; Melissa K Afable; B Graeme Fincke; Amanda K Solch; Seppo T Rinne; Eun Ji Kim; Sarah L Cutrona; Dylan D Thomas; Judith L Strymish; Steven R Simon Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Peter Yellowlees; Michelle Burke Parish; Álvaro González; Steven Chan; Don Hilty; Ana-Maria Iosif; Robert McCarron; Alberto Odor; Lorin Scher; Andrés Sciolla; Jay Shore; Glen Xiong Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Margaret Lowenstein; Olusinmi Bamgbose; Nathaniel Gleason; Mitchell D Feldman Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Esteban Ortiz-Prado; Marta Fors; Aquiles R Henriquez-Trujillo; Gabriel H Cevallos-Sierra; Alejandra Barreto-Grimaldos; Katherine Simbaña-Rivera; Lenin Gomez-Barreno; Eduardo Vasconez; Alex Lister Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Ana Rita J Maria; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Gemma Villanueva; Marita S Fønhus; Claire Glenton; Simon Lewin; Nicholas Henschke; Brian S Buckley; Garrett L Mehl; Tigest Tamrat; Sasha Shepperd Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-08-18