Jill S Remick1, Caitlin Schonewolf2, Peter Gabriel2, Abigail Doucette2, William P Levin2, John C Kucharczuk3, Sunil Singhal3, Taine T V Pechet3, Ramesh Rengan4, Charles B Simone2, Abigail T Berman5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: Abigail.Berman@uphs.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The characteristic Bragg peak of proton beam therapy (PBT) allows for sparing normal tissues beyond the tumor volume that may allow for decreased toxicities associated with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). Here we report the first institutional experience with proton therapy for PORT in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and assess early toxicities and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 61 consecutive patients treated from 2011 to 2014 who underwent PORT for locally advanced NSCLC for positive microscopic margins and/or positive N2 lymph nodes (stage III), with 27 patients receiving PBT and 34 receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 23.1 months for PBT (2.3-42.0 months) and 27.9 months for IMRT (0.5-87.4 months). The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy for PBT (50.4-66.6 Gy) and 54 Gy for IMRT (50.0-72.0 Gy). Grade 3 radiation esophagitis was observed in 1 and 4 patients in the PBT and IMRT groups, respectively. Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis was observed in 1 patient in each cohort. Dosimetric analysis revealed a significant decrease in the V5 and mean lung dose (P = .001 and P = .045, respectively). One-year median overall survival and local recurrence-free survival were 85.2% and 82.4% (95% confidence interval, 72.8%-99.7% and 70.5%-96.2%, P = .648) and 92.3% and 93.3% (82.5%-100%, 84.8%-100%, P = .816) for PBT and IMRT cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative PBT in NSCLC is well-tolerated and has similar excellent short-term outcomes when compared with IMRT. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine if PBT has a meaningful improvement over IMRT for PORT.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The characteristic Bragg peak of proton beam therapy (PBT) allows for sparing normal tissues beyond the tumor volume that may allow for decreased toxicities associated with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). Here we report the first institutional experience with proton therapy for PORT in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and assess early toxicities and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 61 consecutive patients treated from 2011 to 2014 who underwent PORT for locally advanced NSCLC for positive microscopic margins and/or positive N2 lymph nodes (stage III), with 27 patients receiving PBT and 34 receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 23.1 months for PBT (2.3-42.0 months) and 27.9 months for IMRT (0.5-87.4 months). The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy for PBT (50.4-66.6 Gy) and 54 Gy for IMRT (50.0-72.0 Gy). Grade 3 radiation esophagitis was observed in 1 and 4 patients in the PBT and IMRT groups, respectively. Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis was observed in 1 patient in each cohort. Dosimetric analysis revealed a significant decrease in the V5 and mean lung dose (P = .001 and P = .045, respectively). One-year median overall survival and local recurrence-free survival were 85.2% and 82.4% (95% confidence interval, 72.8%-99.7% and 70.5%-96.2%, P = .648) and 92.3% and 93.3% (82.5%-100%, 84.8%-100%, P = .816) for PBT and IMRT cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative PBT in NSCLC is well-tolerated and has similar excellent short-term outcomes when compared with IMRT. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine if PBT has a meaningful improvement over IMRT for PORT.
Authors: Gregory J Anthony; Alexandra Cunliffe; Richard Castillo; Ngoc Pham; Thomas Guerrero; Samuel G Armato; Hania A Al-Hallaq Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Annemarie F Shepherd; Michelle Iocolano; Jonathan Leeman; Brandon S Imber; Aaron T Wild; Michael Offin; Jamie E Chaft; James Huang; Andreas Rimner; Abraham J Wu; Daphna Y Gelblum; Narek Shaverdian; Charles B Simone; Daniel R Gomez; Ellen D Yorke; Andrew Jackson Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-10-14
Authors: Andrew R Barsky; Vishruth K Reddy; John P Plastaras; Edgar Ben-Josef; James M Metz; Andrzej P Wojcieszynski Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2020-02
Authors: Melissa A L Vyfhuis; Nasarachi Onyeuku; Tejan Diwanji; Sina Mossahebi; Neha P Amin; Shahed N Badiyan; Pranshu Mohindra; Charles B Simone Journal: Ther Adv Respir Dis Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 4.031