Literature DB >> 28162037

Does Length of Relationship or Gender Predict Response to Behavioral Diabetes Intervention?

Jonathan Sandberg1, Jeremy B Yorgason1, Lawrence Fisher2, Ruth S Weinstock3, Danielle Hessler2, Jacqueline Dimmock3, Paula M Trief3.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the study was to determine, through secondary analysis, whether the length of a couple's relationship and the participants' gender are associated with glycemic response to a type 2 diabetes (T2D) behavioral couples-based intervention. Methods A randomized trial was conducted to test the impact of a couples-level, telephone-based behavioral intervention on hemoglobin A1C in patients with T2D. One hundred and four patients and partners participated in the couples intervention arm, and 94 individuals participated in the individual arm. A1C levels were measured at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Results Results of the regression analysis showed that for men with T2D (n = 35) in the couples intervention group, longer length of relationship was associated with lower A1C at 1-year follow-up, after controlling for baseline A1C, diabetes duration, and income. Length of relationship was not significantly related to follow-up glycemic measures for women or men with T2D in the individual intervention. Conclusions Study findings suggests that for men with T2D in a couples-based intervention, those in longer relationships may be more likely to benefit from the intervention. More research is needed to better understand factors that contribute to successful couples-based behavioral approaches to help adults with T2D improve their glycemic control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28162037      PMCID: PMC5584368          DOI: 10.1177/0145721717691147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Educ        ISSN: 0145-7217            Impact factor:   2.140


  25 in total

1.  Older adults' beliefs about the timeline of type 2 diabetes and adherence to dietary regimens.

Authors:  Rachel C Hemphill; Mary Ann Parris Stephens; Karen S Rook; Melissa M Franks; James K Salem
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2012-05-17

2.  Challenges and Lessons Learned in the Development and Implementation of a Couples-Focused Telephone Intervention for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: The Diabetes Support Project.

Authors:  Paula M Trief
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  When the going gets tough, does support get going? Determinants of spousal support provision to type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Masumi Iida; Mary Ann Parris Stephens; Karen S Rook; Melissa M Franks; James K Salem
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-05-05

4.  Comparison of family partnership intervention care vs. conventional care in adult patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in a community hospital: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chun-Mei Kang; Shu-Chuan Chang; Ping-Ling Chen; Pei-Fen Liu; Wen-Cheng Liu; Chia-Chi Chang; Wen-Yin Chang
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 5.837

5.  Marital quality and health: Implications for marriage in the 21st century.

Authors:  Theodore F Robles
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-12

6.  Health and Psychosocial Outcomes of a Telephonic Couples Behavior Change Intervention in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Paula M Trief; Lawrence Fisher; Jonathan Sandberg; Donald A Cibula; Jacqueline Dimmock; Danielle M Hessler; Patricia Forken; Ruth S Weinstock
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  The relationship between marital quality and adherence to the diabetes care regimen.

Authors:  Paula M Trief; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Kirsten Dee Britton; Ruth S Weinstock
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2004-06

8.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988-2010.

Authors:  Sarah Stark Casagrande; Judith E Fradkin; Sharon H Saydah; Keith F Rust; Catherine C Cowie
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.