Literature DB >> 28161915

Assessing Precision of Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson Criteria for Staging Early Glaucomatous Damage in an Ocular Hypertension Cohort: A Retrospective Study.

Tutul Chakravarti1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of the study were (1) to stage early glaucomatous field defects following Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson (HPA) criteria in an ocular hypertension (OH) cohort with 7-year follow-up and (2) to recognize the limitation(s) of this staging system.
DESIGN: A retrospective review of subjects with OH.
METHODS: A retrospective review of the visual fields of 183 OH subjects was conducted. A Humphrey Field Analyzer was used for standard automated perimetry in all these participants, tested once every half year for 7 years or until the onset of conversion (study end point). Only nerve fiber bundle glaucomatous abnormalities were identified as per the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study guideline and considered as converted glaucoma cases from OH. Subsequently, those fields were classified as possible, probable, and definite glaucoma cases following HPA criteria. This study also recognized the limitations of Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT) interpretation and the depth and distribution of real scotoma. The criterion for reproducible abnormalities was 3 consecutive abnormal fields with defects in a similar location.
RESULTS: Early glaucomatous defects were identified in 22 patients (27 fields) of 183 OH subjects. Seven of 27 eyes were identified as possible glaucoma, 12 as probable glaucoma, and 8 as definite glaucoma. The GHT was interpreted as within normal limits for 5 cases, borderline for 11 cases, and outside normal limits for 11 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson criteria can recognize subtle nerve damage to diagnose early glaucoma. Visual field abnormalities classified as definite glaucoma cases are less prone to false labeling than normal fields, whereas field defects identified as probable/possible glaucoma may remain underdiagnosed for imprecise GHT interpretations and poor specification of cluster analysis in pattern standard deviation. Copyright
© 2017 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GHT; Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson criteria; OHTS criterion; PSD; ocular hypertension; standard automated perimetry (SAP); visual field

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28161915     DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)        ISSN: 2162-0989


  3 in total

1.  Evidence-Based Criteria for Determining Peripapillary OCT Reliability.

Authors:  Jithin Yohannan; Michael Cheng; Joseph Da; Sagar Chapagain; Ayodeji Sotimehin; Luke W Bonham; Aleksandra Mihailovic; Michael Boland; Pradeep Ramulu
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Point-wise variability of threshold sensitivity of 24-2 and 10-2 visual fields.

Authors:  Aparna Rao; Harsha L Rao; Debananda Padhy
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Comparison of Matrix Frequency-Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry with the SWEDISH Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Mild Glaucoma.

Authors:  Azadeh Doozandeh; Farnoosh Irandoost; Ali Mirzajani; Shahin Yazdani; Mohammad Pakravan; Hamed Esfandiari
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2017
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.