Xin-Qi Pei1, Da-Lin He2, Ge Tian1, Wei Lv1, Yu-Mei Jiang1, Da-Peng Wu1, Jin-Hai Fan1, Kai-Jie Wu3. 1. Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, #277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, #277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China. dalinhe@yahoo.com. 3. Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, #277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China. kaijie_wu@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with therapeutic response in patients who were treated with docetaxel for mCRPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data from 111 consecutive patients who were treated with docetaxel for mCRPC from 2009 to 2016 in a single center from Northwestern China. Pretreatment baseline and follow-up data including age, PSA response, Gleason score, and cycle number were reviewed, and multivariable Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In Kaplan-Meier analyses, the NLR (optimal threshold 3.3), total PSA response, number of chemotherapy cycles, stage T, baseline of PSA, albumin, presence of visceral metastases, and PSA level at the diagnosis of cancer were significantly associated with OS, respectively. In multivariable analyses, higher NLR (>3.3), PSA level at the diagnosis of cancer (≥162 ng/ml), number of chemotherapy cycles, and albumin (<40.5 g/l) were associated with increased risk of death, respectively. Meanwhile, young age, higher NLR, number of chemotherapy cycles, presence of visceral metastases, and poor PSA response were associated with shorter PFS. CONCLUSION: NLR combined with PSA level at the diagnosis of cancer remains an important prognostic marker in predicting therapeutic outcome in Chinese men who receive chemotherapy for mCRPC.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with therapeutic response in patients who were treated with docetaxel for mCRPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data from 111 consecutive patients who were treated with docetaxel for mCRPC from 2009 to 2016 in a single center from Northwestern China. Pretreatment baseline and follow-up data including age, PSA response, Gleason score, and cycle number were reviewed, and multivariable Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In Kaplan-Meier analyses, the NLR (optimal threshold 3.3), total PSA response, number of chemotherapy cycles, stage T, baseline of PSA, albumin, presence of visceral metastases, and PSA level at the diagnosis of cancer were significantly associated with OS, respectively. In multivariable analyses, higher NLR (>3.3), PSA level at the diagnosis of cancer (≥162 ng/ml), number of chemotherapy cycles, and albumin (<40.5 g/l) were associated with increased risk of death, respectively. Meanwhile, young age, higher NLR, number of chemotherapy cycles, presence of visceral metastases, and poor PSA response were associated with shorter PFS. CONCLUSION: NLR combined with PSA level at the diagnosis of cancer remains an important prognostic marker in predicting therapeutic outcome in Chinese men who receive chemotherapy for mCRPC.
Authors: Susan Halabi; Eric J Small; Philip W Kantoff; Michael W Kattan; Ellen B Kaplan; Nancy A Dawson; Ellis G Levine; Brent A Blumenstein; Nicholas J Vogelzang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W S Jang; K S Cho; K H Kim; C Y Yoon; Y J Kang; J Y Lee; W S Ham; K H Rha; S J Hong; Y D Choi Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R J van Soest; A J Templeton; F E Vera-Badillo; F Mercier; G Sonpavde; E Amir; B Tombal; M Rosenthal; M A Eisenberger; I F Tannock; R de Wit Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Katharina Beyer; Lisa Moris; Michael Lardas; Anna Haire; Francesco Barletta; Simone Scuderi; Megan Molnar; Ronald Herrera; Abdul Rauf; Riccardo Campi; Isabella Greco; Kirill Shiranov; Saeed Dabestani; Thomas van den Broeck; Sujenthiran Arun; Mauro Gacci; Giorgio Gandaglia; Muhammad Imran Omar; Steven MacLennan; Monique J Roobol; Bahman Farahmand; Eleni Vradi; Zsuzsanna Devecseri; Alex Asiimwe; Jihong Zong; Sara J Maclennan; Laurence Collette; James NDow; Alberto Briganti; Anders Bjartell; Mieke Van Hemelrijck Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 2.692