Literature DB >> 28161286

MEG and EEG demonstrate similar test-retest reliability of the 40Hz auditory steady-state response.

Kristina T Legget1, Allison K Hild2, Sarah E Steinmetz2, Steven T Simon3, Donald C Rojas4.   

Abstract

The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) is increasingly being used as a biomarker in neuropsychiatric disorders, but research investigating the test-retest reliability of this measure is needed. We previously reported ASSR reliability, measured by electroencephalography (EEG), to 40Hz amplitude-modulated white noise and click train stimuli. The purpose of the current study was to (a) assess the reliability of the MEG-measured ASSR to 40Hz amplitude-modulated white noise and click train stimuli, and (b) compare test-retest reliability between MEG and EEG measures of ASSR, which has not previously been investigated. Additionally, impact of stimulus parameter choice on reliability was assessed, by comparing responses to white noise and click train stimuli. Test-retest reliability, across sessions approximately one week apart, was assessed in 17 healthy adults. On each study day, participants completed two passive listening tasks (white noise and click train stimuli) during separate MEG and EEG recordings. Between-session correlations for evoked power and inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) were assessed following source-space projection. Overall, the MEG-measured ASSR was significantly correlated between sessions (p<0.05, FDR corrected), suggesting acceptable test-retest reliability. Results suggest greater response reproducibility for ITPC compared to evoked responses and for click train compared to white noise stimuli, although further study is warranted. No significant differences in reliability were observed between MEG and EEG measures, suggesting they are similarly reliable. This work supports use of the ASSR as a biomarker in clinical interventions with repeated measures.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory evoked response; Auditory steady state response; Electroencephalography; Inter-trial phase coherence; Magnetoencephalography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28161286      PMCID: PMC5348916          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  45 in total

Review 1.  Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies.

Authors:  Nicole Ille; Patrick Berg; Michael Scherg
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.177

2.  Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.

Authors:  Seppo P Ahlfors; Jooman Han; John W Belliveau; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.

Authors:  M R Nuwer; G Comi; R Emerson; A Fuglsang-Frederiksen; J M Guérit; H Hinrichs; A Ikeda; F J Luccas; P Rappelsburger
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-03

4.  Gamma band oscillations reveal neural network cortical coherence dysfunction in schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Gregory A Light; Jung Lung Hsu; Ming H Hsieh; Katrin Meyer-Gomes; Joyce Sprock; Neal R Swerdlow; David L Braff
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Generation of human auditory steady-state responses (SSRs). I: Stimulus rate effects.

Authors:  G B Azzena; G Conti; R Santarelli; F Ottaviani; G Paludetti; M Maurizi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Differentiation between major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder by auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Shuichi Isomura; Toshiaki Onitsuka; Rikako Tsuchimoto; Itta Nakamura; Shogo Hirano; Yuko Oda; Naoya Oribe; Yoji Hirano; Takefumi Ueno; Shigenobu Kanba
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Delpuech; J Pernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Frequency-specific disruptions of neuronal oscillations reveal aberrant auditory processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lauren K Hayrynen; Jordan P Hamm; Scott R Sponheim; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Cortical source estimates of gamma band amplitude and phase are different in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Peter Teale; Dan Collins; Keeran Maharajh; Donald C Rojas; Eugene Kronberg; Martin Reite
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Response in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanna Thuné; Marc Recasens; Peter J Uhlhaas
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 21.596

View more
  16 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of tone- and 40 Hz train-evoked gamma oscillations in female rats and their sensitivity to low-dose NMDA channel blockade.

Authors:  Muhammad Ummear Raza; Digavalli V Sivarao
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Stimulus-Induced Narrowband Gamma Oscillations are Test-Retest Reliable in Human EEG.

Authors:  Wupadrasta Santosh Kumar; Keerthana Manikandan; Dinavahi V P S Murty; Ranjini Garani Ramesh; Simran Purokayastha; Mahendra Javali; Naren Prahalada Rao; Supratim Ray
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2022-01-07

3.  Three-Year Reliability of MEG Visual and Somatosensory Responses.

Authors:  Marie C McCusker; Brandon J Lew; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.861

4.  Beta Oscillatory Dynamics in the Prefrontal and Superior Temporal Cortices Predict Spatial Working Memory Performance.

Authors:  Amy L Proskovec; Alex I Wiesman; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Test-retest reliability of time-frequency measures of auditory steady-state responses in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls.

Authors:  Brian J Roach; Deepak Cyril D'Souza; Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Intact Auditory Cortical Cross-Frequency Coupling in Early and Chronic Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Nicholas Murphy; Nithya Ramakrishnan; Christopher P Walker; Nicola R Polizzotto; Raymond Y Cho
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Gamma power abnormalities in a Fmr1-targeted transgenic rat model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Naoki Kozono; Ai Okamura; Sokichi Honda; Mitsuyuki Matsumoto; Takuma Mihara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Individual Resonant Frequencies at Low-Gamma Range and Cognitive Processing Speed.

Authors:  Vykinta Parciauskaite; Evaldas Pipinis; Aleksandras Voicikas; Jovana Bjekic; Mindaugas Potapovas; Vytautas Jurkuvenas; Inga Griskova-Bulanova
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-23

9.  FieldTrip Made Easy: An Analysis Protocol for Group Analysis of the Auditory Steady State Brain Response in Time, Frequency, and Space.

Authors:  Tzvetan Popov; Robert Oostenveld; Jan M Schoffelen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Symptom-Dependent Changes in MEG-Derived Neuroelectric Brain Activity in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Chronic Symptoms.

Authors:  Don Krieger; Paul Shepard; Ryan Soose; Ava M Puccio; Sue Beers; Walter Schneider; Anthony P Kontos; Michael W Collins; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.