Literature DB >> 28161094

Effects of Duchenne muscular dystrophy on muscle stiffness and response to electrically-induced muscle contraction: A 12-month follow-up.

Lilian Lacourpaille1, Raphaël Gross2, François Hug2, Arnaud Guével2, Yann Péréon3, Armelle Magot3, Jean-Yves Hogrel4, Antoine Nordez2.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the ability of muscle stiffness (shear modulus) and response to electrically-induced muscle contraction to detect changes in muscle properties over a 12-month period in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Ten children with DMD and nine age-matched healthy male controls participated in two experimental sessions (T0 and T+12months) separated by 12.4 ± 0.9 months. Two contractions of the biceps brachii were electrically-induced during which an ultrasound probe was placed over the muscle. The resting shear modulus was measured using elastography from six muscles. Evoked maximal torque was increased at T+12months in controls (+11.2 ± 7.6%, P <0.001) but was not modified in children with DMD (P = 0.222). Electromechanical delay (+12.9 ± 11.3%, P <0.001) and its force transmission component (+10.1 ± 21.6%, P = 0.003) were significantly longer at T+12months than T0 for children with DMD. The results revealed an increase in muscle stiffness at T+12months in children with DMD for tibialis anterior (+75.1 ± 93.5%, P= 0.043), gastrocnemius medialis (+144.8 ± 180.6%, P= 0.050) and triceps brachii (+35.5 ± 32.2%, P= 0.005). This 12-month follow-up study demonstrates that electromechanical delay and elastography may help detect subtle muscle impairments in patients with DMD. These sensitive outcomes may improve the follow-up of innovative therapeutic interventions within the field of DMD.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elastography; Electromechanical delay; Evoked muscle force; Myopathy; Ultrafast ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28161094     DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord        ISSN: 0960-8966            Impact factor:   4.296


  8 in total

1.  Contemporary image-based methods for measuring passive mechanical properties of skeletal muscles in vivo.

Authors:  Lynne E Bilston; Bart Bolsterlee; Antoine Nordez; Shantanu Sinha
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-09-20

Review 2.  Advancements in magnetic resonance imaging-based biomarkers for muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Doris G Leung
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Imaging respiratory muscle quality and function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Alison M Barnard; Donovan J Lott; Abhinandan Batra; William T Triplett; Sean C Forbes; Samuel L Riehl; Rebecca J Willcocks; Barbara K Smith; Krista Vandenborne; Glenn A Walter
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Sonoelastography of the trunk and lower extremity muscles in a case of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Stacey M Cornelson; Ashley N Ruff; Muriel Perillat; Norman W Kettner
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-06-29

5.  Translocation of molecular chaperones to the titin springs is common in skeletal myopathy patients and affects sarcomere function.

Authors:  Andreas Unger; Lisa Beckendorf; Pierre Böhme; Rudolf Kley; Marion von Frieling-Salewsky; Hanns Lochmüller; Rolf Schröder; Dieter O Fürst; Matthias Vorgerd; Wolfgang A Linke
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 7.801

6.  A muscle fatigue-like contractile decline was recapitulated using skeletal myotubes from Duchenne muscular dystrophy patient-derived iPSCs.

Authors:  Tomoya Uchimura; Toshifumi Asano; Takao Nakata; Akitsu Hotta; Hidetoshi Sakurai
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-06-04

7.  Intramuscular Pressure of Tibialis Anterior Reflects Ankle Torque but Does Not Follow Joint Angle-Torque Relationship.

Authors:  Filiz Ateş; Brenda L Davies; Swati Chopra; Krista Coleman-Wood; William J Litchy; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Muscle ultrasound: Present state and future opportunities.

Authors:  Juerd Wijntjes; Nens van Alfen
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.217

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.