Literature DB >> 28161047

Mercury species in formerly contaminated soils and released soil gases.

Jiřina Sysalová1, Jan Kučera2, Barbora Drtinová3, Rostislav Červenka4, Ondřej Zvěřina5, Josef Komárek4, Jan Kameník2.   

Abstract

Total mercury (T-Hg), elemental mercury (Hg0), methylmercury (MeHg+), phenylmercury (PhHg+), and gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) species were determined in soils formerly contaminated by different processes from two sites in the Czech Republic. Analytical methods involved atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) using a single-purpose Advanced Mercury Analyser AMA-254 and radiochemical neutron activation analysis (RNAA) for T-Hg determination, a thermal desorption method was used for Hg0 determination, gas chromatography coupled with atomic fluorescence spectrometry (GC-AFS) was employed for assay of MeHg+ and PhHg+, while GEM measurement was carried out using a portable Zeeman-AAS device Lumex RA-915+. The first sampling site was in the surroundings of a former PhHgCl-based fungicide processing plant next to Příbram (central Bohemia). Although the use of Hg-based fungicides as seed mordant have been banned, and their production stopped at the end of 1980's, highly elevated Hg contents in soil are still observed in the vicinity of the former plant, reaching T-Hg values >13mgkg-1. The second sampling site was an abandoned mining area named Jedová hora Hill near Hořovice (central Bohemia), where cinnabar (HgS) was occasionally mined as by-product of Fe ores hematite and siderite. Mining activities have been stopped here in 1857. Very high contents of T-Hg are still found at this site, up to 144mgkg-1. In most cases we found a statistically significant correlation between T-Hg and Hg0 values regardless of the pollution source. On the contrary, insignificant correlation was observed neither between T-Hg and GEM values, nor between GEM and Hg0. Concentrations of the investigated organomercury species were above a limit of detection (LOD) only in the most contaminated samples, where their levels were about two to three orders of magnitude lower compared to those of T-Hg.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elemental mercury; Gaseous elemental mercury; Mercury contaminated soils; Methylmercury; Phenylmercury; Total mercury

Year:  2017        PMID: 28161047     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

Review 1.  From classic methodologies to application of nanomaterials for soil remediation: an integrated view of methods for decontamination of toxic metal(oid)s.

Authors:  Lilian Rodrigues Rosa Souza; Luiza Carolina Pomarolli; Márcia Andreia Mesquita Silva da Veiga
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Mercury accumulation and transformation of main leaf vegetable crops in Cambosol and Ferrosol soil in China.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Yi Gao; Chunxue Zhang; Xiangqun Zheng; Bo Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effect of inorganic carbonate and organic matter in thermal treatment of mercury-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Kanghee Cho; Jinkyu Kang; Songbae Kim; Oyunbileg Purev; Eunji Myung; Hyunsoo Kim; Nagchoul Choi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.