Literature DB >> 28160485

A new simplified electrocardiographic score predicts clinical outcome in patients treated with CRT.

Eszter M Végh1,2, Jagdesh Kandala1, Lukasz Januszkiewicz1,3, Jen Ren1, Alexandra Miller1, Mary Orencole1, Dan Blendea1, Béla Merkely2, László Gellér2, Jagmeet P Singh1, Rasmus Borgquist4.   

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality for patients with heart failure and wide QRS complex, but up to 1/3 of patients are "non-responders" to the therapy. This study examines the ability of a simple standard electrocardiogram (ECG)-based scoring system to predict clinical outcome. Methods and results: Four hundred and ninety-one consecutive patients with CRT-implants (79% males, mean age 71 years, LVEF 24%, 59% with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 83% in NYHA class III) were included from a single large volume centre. All patients met standard indications for CRT, and were followed for 3 years after CRT implantation. Three ECG parameters were measured on the post-implant ECG, and compared to pre-implantation measurements: QRS duration, time to intrinsicoid deflection onset (ID) in V1 lead, amplitude change in V1 lead. Each positive ECG variable was given a numerical value of 1 to create the score (ranging 0-3). Clinical outcome was assessed as a composite of all-cause death, left ventricular assist device implantation, cardiac transplantation and HF hospitalization. Event-free survival was predicted by shortening of QRS duration ≥20 ms (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.48-0.90] P = 0.009), ≥50% decreased summed R + S amplitude in V1 lead (HR 0.67 [0.49-0.90] P = 0.009) and ≤40 msec ID time in lead V1 during pacing (HR 0.63 [0.46-0.86] P = 0.004). The total score was an independent predictor for both event-free survival (HR 0.65 [0.54-0.77] P < 0.001) and for ≥10% left ventricular ejection fraction improvement (OR 1.7 [1.3-2.3] P < 0.001). Conclusions: Composite data from 12-lead ECG during CRT-treatment can be used in a simple score to predict long-term clinical outcome. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2017. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28160485     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  4 in total

1.  Impact of S-Wave Amplitude in Right Precordial Leads on Improvement in Mitral Regurgitation following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Naoya Kataoka; Teruhiko Imamura; Takahisa Koi; Shuhei Tanaka; Nobuyuki Fukuda; Hiroshi Ueno; Koichiro Kinugawa
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  The VALID-CRT risk score reliably predicts response and outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy in a real-world population.

Authors:  Emanuele Bertaglia; Giuseppe Arena; Domenico Pecora; Albino Reggiani; Antonio D'Onofrio; Pietro Palmisano; Antonio De Simone; Salvatore I Caico; Massimiliano Marini; Giampiero Maglia; Anna Ferraro; Francesco Solimene; Antonella Cecchetto; Maurizio Malacrida; Giovanni L Botto; Maurizio Lunati; Giuseppe Stabile
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Electrocardiographic markers of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: delayed time to intrinsicoid deflection onset in lateral leads.

Authors:  Rubén Ka Tapia-Orihuela; S Michael Gharacholou; Samuel J Asirvatham; Freddy Del-Carpio Munoz
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  QRS Narrowing Following CRT Implantation: Predictors, Dynamics, and Association with Improved Long-Term Outcome.

Authors:  Daniel Lapidot; Moshe Rav-Acha; Tali Bdolah-Abram; Rivka Farkash; Michael Glikson; Tal Hasin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.