Jay D Amsterdam1, Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces1,2, Robert J DeRubeis1,2. 1. Depression Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined differences in treatment outcome between Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)-defined rapid cycling and average lifetime-defined rapid cycling in subjects with bipolar II disorder. We hypothesized that, compared with the DSM-IV definition, the average lifetime definition of rapid cycling may better identify subjects with a history of more mood lability and a greater likelihood of hypomanic symptom induction during long-term treatment. METHODS: Subjects ≥18 years old with a bipolar II major depressive episode (n=129) were categorized into DSM-IV- and average lifetime-defined rapid cycling and prospectively treated with either venlafaxine or lithium monotherapy for 12 weeks. Responders (n=59) received continuation monotherapy for six additional months. RESULTS: These exploratory analyses found moderate agreement between the two rapid-cycling definitions (κ=0.56). The lifetime definition captured subjects with more chronic courses of bipolar II depression, whereas the DSM-IV definition captured subjects with more acute symptoms of hypomania. There was no difference between rapid-cycling definitions with respect to the response to acute venlafaxine or lithium monotherapy. However, the lifetime definition was slightly superior to the DSM-IV definition in identifying subjects who went on to experience hypomanic symptoms during continuation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although sample sizes were limited, the findings suggest that the lifetime definition of rapid cycling may identify individuals with a chronic rapid-cycling course and may also be slightly superior to the DSM-IV definition in identifying individuals with hypomania during relapse-prevention therapy. These findings are preliminary in nature and need replication in larger, prospective, bipolar II studies.
OBJECTIVES: We examined differences in treatment outcome between Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)-defined rapid cycling and average lifetime-defined rapid cycling in subjects with bipolar II disorder. We hypothesized that, compared with the DSM-IV definition, the average lifetime definition of rapid cycling may better identify subjects with a history of more mood lability and a greater likelihood of hypomanic symptom induction during long-term treatment. METHODS: Subjects ≥18 years old with a bipolar II major depressive episode (n=129) were categorized into DSM-IV- and average lifetime-defined rapid cycling and prospectively treated with either venlafaxine or lithium monotherapy for 12 weeks. Responders (n=59) received continuation monotherapy for six additional months. RESULTS: These exploratory analyses found moderate agreement between the two rapid-cycling definitions (κ=0.56). The lifetime definition captured subjects with more chronic courses of bipolar II depression, whereas the DSM-IV definition captured subjects with more acute symptoms of hypomania. There was no difference between rapid-cycling definitions with respect to the response to acute venlafaxine or lithium monotherapy. However, the lifetime definition was slightly superior to the DSM-IV definition in identifying subjects who went on to experience hypomanic symptoms during continuation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although sample sizes were limited, the findings suggest that the lifetime definition of rapid cycling may identify individuals with a chronic rapid-cycling course and may also be slightly superior to the DSM-IV definition in identifying individuals with hypomania during relapse-prevention therapy. These findings are preliminary in nature and need replication in larger, prospective, bipolar II studies.
Authors: C L Bowden; J R Calabrese; S L McElroy; L J Rhodes; P E Keck; J Cookson; J Anderson; C Bolden-Watson; J Ascher; E Monaghan; J Zhou Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 1999-04-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Gabriele S Leverich; Lori L Altshuler; Mark A Frye; Trisha Suppes; Susan L McElroy; Paul E Keck; Ralph W Kupka; Kirk D Denicoff; Willem A Nolen; Heinz Grunze; Maria I Martinez; Robert M Post Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: S Nassir Ghaemi; Klara J Rosenquist; James Y Ko; Claudia F Baldassano; Nicholas J Kontos; Ross J Baldessarini Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Isabella Pacchiarotti; David J Bond; Ross J Baldessarini; Willem A Nolen; Heinz Grunze; Rasmus W Licht; Robert M Post; Michael Berk; Guy M Goodwin; Gary S Sachs; Leonardo Tondo; Robert L Findling; Eric A Youngstrom; Mauricio Tohen; Juan Undurraga; Ana González-Pinto; Joseph F Goldberg; Ayşegül Yildiz; Lori L Altshuler; Joseph R Calabrese; Philip B Mitchell; Michael E Thase; Athanasios Koukopoulos; Francesc Colom; Mark A Frye; Gin S Malhi; Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Gustavo Vázquez; Roy H Perlis; Terence A Ketter; Frederick Cassidy; Hagop Akiskal; Jean-Michel Azorin; Marc Valentí; Diego Hidalgo Mazzei; Beny Lafer; Tadafumi Kato; Lorenzo Mazzarini; Anabel Martínez-Aran; Gordon Parker; Daniel Souery; Ayşegül Ozerdem; Susan L McElroy; Paolo Girardi; Michael Bauer; Lakshmi N Yatham; Carlos A Zarate; Andrew A Nierenberg; Boris Birmaher; Shigenobu Kanba; Rif S El-Mallakh; Alessandro Serretti; Zoltan Rihmer; Allan H Young; Georgios D Kotzalidis; Glenda M MacQueen; Charles L Bowden; S Nassir Ghaemi; Carlos Lopez-Jaramillo; Janusz Rybakowski; Kyooseob Ha; Giulio Perugi; Siegfried Kasper; Jay D Amsterdam; Robert M Hirschfeld; Flávio Kapczinski; Eduard Vieta Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 18.112