Eva Maria Støa1, Sondre Meling2, Lill-Katrin Nyhus3, Karl Magnus Mangerud3, Jan Helgerud3,4,5, Solfrid Bratland-Sanda3, Øyvind Støren3. 1. Department of Sports, Physical Education and Outdoor Life Studies, University College of Southeast Norway, Bø, Porsgrunn, Norway. Eva.m.stoa@hit.no. 2. Department of Endocrinology, Stavanger University Hospital, Former Hospital of Telemark, Stavanger, Norway. 3. Department of Sports, Physical Education and Outdoor Life Studies, University College of Southeast Norway, Bø, Porsgrunn, Norway. 4. Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. 5. Hokksund Medical Rehabilitation Center, Hokksund, Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It remains to be established how high-intensity aerobic interval training (HAIT) affects risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes (TD2). This study investigated effects of HAIT on maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), glycated Hemoglobin type A1C (HbA1c), insulin resistance (IR), fat oxidation (FatOx), body weight (BW), percent body fat (%BF), lactate threshold (LT), blood pressure (BP), and blood lipid profile (BLP) among persons with T2D. Results were compared to the effects after a moderate-intensity training (MIT) program. METHODS: Thirty-eight individuals with T2D completed 12 weeks of supervised training. HAIT consisted of 4 × 4 min of walking or running uphill at 85-95% of maximal heart rate, and MIT consisted of continuous walking at 70-75% of maximal heart rate. RESULTS: A 21% increase in VO2max (from 25.6 to 30.9 ml kg-1 min-1, p < 0.001), and a reduction in HbA1c by -0.58% points (from 7.78 to 7.20%, p < 0.001) was found in HAIT. BW and body mass index (BMI) was reduced by 1.9% (p < 0.01). There was a tendency towards an improved FatOx at 60% VO2max (14%, p = 0.065). These improvements were significant different from MIT. Both HAIT and MIT increased velocity at LT, and reduced %BF, waist circumference, hip circumference, and BP, with no significant differences between the two groups. Correlations were found between change in VO2max and change in HbA1c when the two intervention groups were combined (R = -0.52, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: HAIT is an effective exercise strategy to improve aerobic fitness and reduce risk factors associated with T2D.
PURPOSE: It remains to be established how high-intensity aerobic interval training (HAIT) affects risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes (TD2). This study investigated effects of HAIT on maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), glycated Hemoglobin type A1C (HbA1c), insulin resistance (IR), fat oxidation (FatOx), body weight (BW), percent body fat (%BF), lactate threshold (LT), blood pressure (BP), and blood lipid profile (BLP) among persons with T2D. Results were compared to the effects after a moderate-intensity training (MIT) program. METHODS: Thirty-eight individuals with T2D completed 12 weeks of supervised training. HAIT consisted of 4 × 4 min of walking or running uphill at 85-95% of maximal heart rate, and MIT consisted of continuous walking at 70-75% of maximal heart rate. RESULTS: A 21% increase in VO2max (from 25.6 to 30.9 ml kg-1 min-1, p < 0.001), and a reduction in HbA1c by -0.58% points (from 7.78 to 7.20%, p < 0.001) was found in HAIT. BW and body mass index (BMI) was reduced by 1.9% (p < 0.01). There was a tendency towards an improved FatOx at 60% VO2max (14%, p = 0.065). These improvements were significant different from MIT. Both HAIT and MIT increased velocity at LT, and reduced %BF, waist circumference, hip circumference, and BP, with no significant differences between the two groups. Correlations were found between change in VO2max and change in HbA1c when the two intervention groups were combined (R = -0.52, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: HAIT is an effective exercise strategy to improve aerobic fitness and reduce risk factors associated with T2D.
Authors: D Hansen; P Dendale; R A M Jonkers; M Beelen; R J F Manders; L Corluy; A Mullens; J Berger; R Meeusen; L J C van Loon Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Øyvind Støren; Jan Helgerud; Mona Sæbø; Eva Maria Støa; Solfrid Bratland-Sanda; Runar J Unhjem; Jan Hoff; Eivind Wang Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Thomas P J Solomon; Steven K Malin; Kristian Karstoft; Sine H Knudsen; Jacob M Haus; Matthew J Laye; John P Kirwan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Asa B Segerström; Forouzan Glans; Karl-Fredrik Eriksson; Anna Maria Holmbäck; Leif Groop; Ola Thorsson; Per Wollmer Journal: Eur J Intern Med Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 4.487
Authors: Elizabeth Selvin; Spyridon Marinopoulos; Gail Berkenblit; Tejal Rami; Frederick L Brancati; Neil R Powe; Sherita Hill Golden Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-09-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Silvio E Inzucchi; Richard M Bergenstal; John B Buse; Michaela Diamant; Ele Ferrannini; Michael Nauck; Anne L Peters; Apostolos Tsapas; Richard Wender; David R Matthews Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jessica L Montoya; Catherine M Jankowski; Kelly K O'Brien; Allison R Webel; Krisann K Oursler; Brook L Henry; David J Moore; Kristine M Erlandson Journal: AIDS Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Djeniffer Elias da Silva; Antônio José Grande; Leonardo Roever; Gary Tse; Tong Liu; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Joni Márcio de Farias Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2019-02-02 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Fang Pu; Weiyan Ren; Hongyuan Fu; Xuan Zheng; Min Yang; Yih-Kuen Jan; Yubo Fan Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 2.602